• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 383
  • 231
  • 218
  • 114
  • 36
  • 11
  • 10
  • 7
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 5730
  • 2288
  • 281
  • 182
  • 162
  • 160
  • 157
  • 132
  • 122
  • 121
  • 119
  • 113
  • 111
  • 108
  • 98
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

On the relationship between philosophy and sociology

Campion, M. G. 1979 (has links)
No description available.
2

An enquiry into the status of cognitive activity, and its relation to meaning and symbols, with special reference to the theories of Professors Ryle and Ayer

Broadie, F. 1952 (has links)
No description available.
3

Is linguistics a part of psychology?

Fitzgerald, G. 2009 (has links)
Noam Chomsky, the founding father of generative grammar and the instigator of some of its core research programs, claims that linguistics is a part of psychology, concerned with a class of cognitive structures employed in speaking and understanding. In a recent book, Ignorance of Language, Michael Devitt has challenged certain core aspects of linguistics, as prominent practitioners of the science conceive of it. Among Devitt’s major conclusions is that linguistics is not a part of psychology. In this thesis I defend Chomsky’s psychological conception of grammatical theory. My case for the psychological conception involves defending a set of psychological goals for generative grammars, centring on conditions of descriptive and explanatory adequacy. I argue that generative grammar makes an explanatory commitment to a distinction between a psychological system of grammatical competence and the performance systems engaged in putting that competence to use. I then defend the view that this distinction can be investigated by probing speakers’ linguistic intuitions. Building on the psychological goals of generative grammar and its explanatory commitment to a psychological theory of grammatical competence, I argue that generative grammar neither targets nor presupposes non-psychological grammatical properties. The latter nonpsychological properties are dispensable to grammarians’ explanations because their explanatory goals can be met by the theory of grammatical competence to which they are committed. So generative grammars have psychological properties as their subject matter and linguistics is a part of psychology.
4

Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy

Rees, Graham Charles 1970 (has links)
No description available.
5

Perception and inference in the Nyydasid-dhantamanjari : text, translation and notes

Gelblum, T. 1960 (has links)
No description available.
6

The morality of groups

Franklin, Donald Edwin 1999 (has links)
No description available.
7

On the alleged impossibility of understanding consciousness

Garvey, James Mackenzie 2000 (has links)
No description available.
8

Unlatching the gate : realising my scholarship of living inquiry

Mead, Geoffrey Douglas 2001 (has links)
No description available.
9

Foedus Naturale : The origins of federal theology in sixteenth century Reformation thought

Weir, D. A. 1984 (has links)
No description available.
10

The necessity of natural laws

Bostock, Simon J. 2001 (has links)
No description available.

Page generated in 0.0252 seconds