This thesis examines judical mediation from a constitutional and jurisprudential perspective. More specifically, it asks whether Ch III of the Commonwealth Constitution limits the capacity of Australian judges to engage in judicial mediation and, if so, how this will afffect the development of judicial mediation in practice.

Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2018-09-21T15:29:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliano Alves Lopes_.pdf: 2664641 bytes, checksum: a69c2cf903e9701768dcd69d528f812b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-21T15:29:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliano Alves Lopes_.pdf: 2664641 bytes, checksum: a69c2cf903e9701768dcd69d528f812b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-20 / Nenhuma / O presente trabalho busca analisar as principais características do modelo de mediação de conflitos desenvolvido e praticado pelo Poder Judiciário brasileiro, a chamada “mediação judicial”, avaliando a adequação deste modelo consensual de tratamento dos conflitos em relação à sua incorporação às estruturas do sistema jurisdicional brasileiro, como consequência da implementação da “política judiciária nacional de tratamento adequado dos conflitos de interesse no âmbito do Poder Judiciário” estabelecida a partir da Resolução nº 125/2010 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Com base nessas reflexões, discute-se de que forma a adoção da mediação judicial relaciona-se com a crise do Estado e as tensões próprias da sociedade contemporânea, bem como apresenta-se a possibilidade de uma transição paradigmática conexa à utilização de modos consensuais de tratamento de conflitos e à ideia de “jurisconstrução”. / This work aims to analyse the main characteristics of the conflict mediation model developed and practised by the brazilian Judiciary Power, the so called “judicial mediation”, evaluating the adequacy of this consensual mode of conflict treatment in relation to its incorporation to the structures of the brazilian jurisdictional system, as a consequence of the implementation of the “national judiciary policy on the adequate treatment of conflicts in the Judiciary Power”, which was established by the Resolution nº 125/2010, from the National Council of Justice. Based on these reflections, it discusses in which way the adoption of the judicial mediation relates to the crisis of the State and the tensions of contemporary society, as well as presenting the possibility of a paradigmatic transition conected to the use of consensual ways of conflict treatment and the idea of “jurisconstruction”.

EUROPEAN TRENDS IN JUDICIAL MEDIATION AND THEIR USE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Abstract This dissertation deals with the phenomenon of judicial mediation. In the first part, it defines the term of mediation as such and determines its essential and additional elements. Further, the text looks into the wide spectrum of cases in which this method of alternative dispute resolution can be applied. The author specifically points out that limiting its use to family matters is rather inappropriate. The following section systematically identifies the individual types, forms and methods of mediation so that each mediation can be customized for the respective case. Finally, the first part ends with a reflection on the current issues connected to criticism of mediation. These are the enforcement of international mediated settlement agreements, the potential conflict with access to justice and the binding nature as well as enforceability of mediation clauses including their stipulation in general terms and conditions. The second part is an analysis of the use of judicial mediation in selected European countries - Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia and Spain. Different approaches to the implementation of the mediation directive are described as well as techniques for the promotion of its use. The output of the...