Previous research of the Court of Appeals made in the past focused primarily on personnel matters. The authors focused on the appeals judgements occasionally. This is the reason why any significant progress in historical research in areas such as procedural matters, the definition and enforcement powers or the application of law didn't result. This thesis has the ambition to fill this empty space, at least partially. The aim of the dissertation is to provide a comprehensive picture of the Court of Appeals in the Czech lands from its foundation in 1548 to the early 17th century. This period represents a compact stage of development, when the status, authority and personnel structure are formatted and above all the shaping of decision-making and procedural practice occurs. Dissertation devotes most attention to appellate procedures. It shows what the role of Court of Appeals itself, of the lower courts and of litigant was. It examines in detail the various procedural aspects. It pays attention on how the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals was accepted by royal and other towns in Bohemia and how the Court asserted towards other courts. It also mentions developments in other lands of the Czech Crown. The main subject of the research are the judgements of the Court of Appeals and normative sources...

Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:34:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jairo Haber.pdf: 462280 bytes, checksum: 32f8690833548015b92488d8236ffd9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-11-24 / This work looks for solutions for the Judiciary Court working performance. The analyze of its contentious and adversative system will verify the difficulties in the service rendered to society that must be more efficient, explores the possibility of a paradigmatic change in conflictive human interactions, trying to aggregate interdisciplinary instrumental, suggesting management and solutions to structured conflicts that will become access to justice, not only using the conventional Judiciary Court structure but also using preventive adequate strategies and techniques to solve interpersonal conflicts, stimulating solutions and interpersonal agreements as an instrument of democracy and civil rights. We propose the use and practice of abilities and interdisciplinary comprehension as a tool for the ethic sense of professionalism and the understanding of the juridical phenomenon. / O presente trabalho procura, a partir da análise do atual quadro institucional e diagnóstico do Poder Judiciário e o seu sistema de atuação, contenciosa e adversarial, que resulta na verificação das dificuldades enfrentadas para a prestação de serviço eficiente à sociedade, explorar a possibilidade de mudança paradigmática na apreciação das interações humanas conflituosas de forma a agregar instrumental interdisciplinar, sugerindo, mecanismos de gestão e solução de conflitos estruturados que propiciem a realização do acesso à Justiça, não apenas pela estrutura convencional do Poder Judiciário, mas também por meio de estratégias e técnicas adequadas de prevenção, gestão e solução de conflitos interpessoais, que estimulem soluções autocompositivas não adversariais, como instrumento de democratização e efetivação de um Estado de Direito. O trabalho propõe, ainda, o uso e prática de habilidades e compreensão interdisciplinar, como ferramenta de desenvolvimento do senso ético profissional e de apreensão do fenômeno jurídico.