Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) putatively arises from the pancreatic duct, thus usage of the normal human pancreatic duct epithelial (HPDE) cell line is an ideal model to examine the successive accumulation of genetic alterations involved in carcinogenesis. KRAS mutations have been reported in 90% of PDACs. Oncogenic KRAS elicits activation of downstream pathways involved in survival, motility, and cell cycle progression. KRASG12V introduction in the HPDE cell line upregulates Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) expression. LCN2 has been identified in numerous carcinomas and is associated with survival, tumorigenicity, and invasion. In this work, LCN2 was found to be commonly expressed in high grade pancreatic duct neoplastic precursor lesions and PDAC illustrating its potential as a biomarker. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that high LCN2 expression promotes gemcitabine resistance, MMP-9 activity, angiogenesis, and tumorigenicity. Loss of Smad4 function is found in 55% of PDAC cases. Smad4 is a critical component in the TGF-β signaling which mediates the transcription of genes involved in processes such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and invasion. This work examined the consequences of KRASG12V expression and Smad4 loss in the HPDE model. Cellular invasion was promoted by KRASG12V expression or knocking down Smad4 by 80% in the HPDE model. A TGF-β resistant HPDE cell line, TβR, was shown to lack Smad4 expression due to deletion, promoter methylation, and nonsense mutation. KRASG12V expression in the TβR model (TβR KRAS) promoted neoplastic transformation and tumour formation in immunodeficient mice with complete penetrance. Smad4 expression in the TβR KRAS cell line reinstated TGF-β signaling, delayed tumour formation, and decreased metastatic spread. This study provides evidence that Smad4 acts as a restriction point in the transformation of HPDE cells. Overall, this work examines the contribution of genes involved in transformation, and identifies a potential therapeutic and diagnostic biomarker in PDAC.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) putatively arises from the pancreatic duct, thus usage of the normal human pancreatic duct epithelial (HPDE) cell line is an ideal model to examine the successive accumulation of genetic alterations involved in carcinogenesis. KRAS mutations have been reported in 90% of PDACs. Oncogenic KRAS elicits activation of downstream pathways involved in survival, motility, and cell cycle progression. KRASG12V introduction in the HPDE cell line upregulates Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) expression. LCN2 has been identified in numerous carcinomas and is associated with survival, tumorigenicity, and invasion. In this work, LCN2 was found to be commonly expressed in high grade pancreatic duct neoplastic precursor lesions and PDAC illustrating its potential as a biomarker. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that high LCN2 expression promotes gemcitabine resistance, MMP-9 activity, angiogenesis, and tumorigenicity. Loss of Smad4 function is found in 55% of PDAC cases. Smad4 is a critical component in the TGF-β signaling which mediates the transcription of genes involved in processes such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and invasion. This work examined the consequences of KRASG12V expression and Smad4 loss in the HPDE model. Cellular invasion was promoted by KRASG12V expression or knocking down Smad4 by 80% in the HPDE model. A TGF-β resistant HPDE cell line, TβR, was shown to lack Smad4 expression due to deletion, promoter methylation, and nonsense mutation. KRASG12V expression in the TβR model (TβR KRAS) promoted neoplastic transformation and tumour formation in immunodeficient mice with complete penetrance. Smad4 expression in the TβR KRAS cell line reinstated TGF-β signaling, delayed tumour formation, and decreased metastatic spread. This study provides evidence that Smad4 acts as a restriction point in the transformation of HPDE cells. Overall, this work examines the contribution of genes involved in transformation, and identifies a potential therapeutic and diagnostic biomarker in PDAC.

<p>Lung cancer is the third most prevalent cancer in the world; however it is the leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of the lung cancer cases. The current strategies to treat NSCLC patients with frequent causal genetic mutations is through targeted therapeutics. Approximately 10-35% of NSCLC patient tumors have activated mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) resulting in uncontrolled cellular proliferation. The standard-of care for such patients is EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), a class of targeted therapeutics that specifically inhibit EGFR activity. One such EGFR-TKI used in this study is erlotinib. Following erlotinib treatment, tumors rapidly regress at first; however, over 50% of patients develop erlotinib resistance within a year post treatment. Development of resistance remains to be the major challenge in treatment of NSCLC using EGFR-TKIs such as erlotinib. </p> <p>In approximately 60% of cases, acquired erlotinib resistance in patients is attributed to a secondary mutation in EGFR, whereas in about 20% of cases, activation of alternative signaling pathways is the reported mechanism. For the remaining 15-20% of <a>cases</a> the mechanism of resistance remains unknown. Therefore, it can be speculated that the common methods used to identify genetic mutations in tumors post erlotinib treatment, such as histologic analysis and genetic screening may fail to identify alterations in epigenetic mediators of erlotinib resistance, also including microRNAs (miRNAs). MiRNAs are short non-coding RNAs that post-transcriptionally negatively regulate their target transcripts. Hence, in this study two comprehensive screens were simultaneously conducted in erlotinib sensitive cells: 1) a genome-wide knock-out screen, conducted with the hypothesis that loss of function of certain genes drive erlotinib resistance, 2) a miRNA overexpression screen, conducted with the hypothesis that certain miRNAs drive the development of erlotinib resistance when overexpressed. The overreaching goal of the study was to identify novel drivers of erlotinib resistance such as microRNAs or other epigenetic factors in NSCLC.</p><p>The findings of this study led to the identification of a tumor suppressive protein and an epigenetic regulator, SUV420H2 (KMT5C) that has never been reported to be involved in erlotinib resistance. On the other hand, the miRNA overexpression screen identified five miRNAs that contribute to erlotinib resistance that were extensively analyzed using multiple bioinformatic tools. It was predicted that the miRNAs mediate erlotinib resistance via multiple pathways, owing to the ability of each miRNA to target multiple transcripts via partial complementarity. Importantly, a correlation between the two screens was identified clearly supporting the use of two simultaneous screens as a reliable technique to determine highly significant miRNA-target interactions. Overall, the findings from this study suggest that epigenetic factors, such as histone modifiers and miRNAs function as critical mediators of erlotinib resistance, possibly belonging to the 15-20% of NSCLC cases with unidentified mechanisms involved in erlotinib resistance.</p><p></p>