Swaziland changed its pedagogy from the teacher-centred O level to IGCSE which is learnercentred. In preparation for a pedagogical change, some logistics were put into place; amongst these, teacher development. Research points out that what the teacher does in class is significant and has a bearing in the learner’s outcomes, therefore appropriate and adequate teacher training should be afforded to the implementers of a new pedagogy. This study seeks to find out how Swazi teachers were trained in preparation for the pedagogical change. The study was done in a qualitative manner, whereby semi-structured interviews were used as a method of collecting data. The study revealed that even though teachers were trained for the implementation of the new pedagogy, the training was not effective because it was for a few days, no effective follow up was made and it also did not take into consideration the teachers’ pedagogical needs, it assumed a one-size-fit all approach.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Humanities, School of Education, 2011 / This study is a located in a foundational undergraduate mathematics course designed to facilitate the transition from school mathematics to advanced mathematics. The focus of the study is on two innovations in the course; the use of practical problems that make links to non-mathematical practices and a learner-centred pedagogy. While these innovations are part of the discourse of the mathematics education community in terms of access to school mathematics, this study investigates the relationship between these innovations and access to advanced mathematics. The texts of three practical problems from the course and texts representing the verbal and non-verbal action of 17 students as they worked collaboratively in small groups on these problems were analyzed. The analysis of these texts is used to describe and explain, firstly, how the practical problems in the foundational course represent the practice of foundational undergraduate mathematics and its relationship to other practices in the educational space (for example, school mathematics, calculus reform, advanced mathematics, and non-mathematical practices). Secondly, the students‟ enabling and constraining mathematical action on the practical problems is described and explained. Answering the empirical questions in this study has required theoretical work to develop a socio-political perspective of mathematical practice. This theoretical perspective is based on Fairclough‟s social practice perspective from critical linguistics, but has been supplemented with recontextualized theoretical constructs used by Morgan, Moschkovich and Sfard in mathematics education. These constructs are used to conceptualize the notion of mathematical discourse and action on mathematical objects in this discourse. The methodological work of this study has involved supplementing Fairclough‟s method of critical discourse analysis with Sfard‟s method of focal analysis to analyze mathematical, discursive, social and political action in a socio-political mathematical practice. The central finding of this thesis is that foundational mathematical practice represents both continuities and disruptions in its relationship to other practices in the space. As a result, participation in the foundational practice is complex, requiring control over the how and when of boundary crossings across practices, social events and texts. On the basis of this complexity, innovative foundational practice is positioned paradoxically in the higher education space. On the one hand, it represents an alternative to the dominant representation of mathematical practice and positioning of the foundational student in higher education. On the other hand, the complexity of foundational practice makes access to advanced mathematics problematic and foundational practice thus reproduces the dominant ordering.

In this research, the teaching styles of one biology teacher in each of three high schools in Rwanda are investigated. The purpose of the research is to find out how the adopted biology teaching styles impact on the teacher-student interaction and on the student‟s learning of biology in Kigali City in Rwanda. This research is descriptive and it is conducted in the qualitative research paradigm. The research approach used is a case study in three state and subsidised high schools. The research methods included interviews with six students and three teachers, classroom observations of three biology lessons per teacher and field-notes. The Rwandan education system has introduced a new approach to teaching i.e. the learner-centred pedagogy through an associative teaching style. In high schools, this new approach was first implemented in the school year 2011 but this implementation has been constrained by the scarcity of resources. Furthermore, some biology teachers, at the start of 2011, were not yet informed by educational authorities about the implementation of the learner-centred pedagogy. Thus, this research shows that some biology teachers are still using the teacher-centred approach; this is the case for Mr. Odumbe, whose teaching style is dominated by the transmissive approach, or the case of Mr. Kaggwa, whose view is that the educational authorities encourage the transmissive method of teaching. Even though the learner-centred pedagogy is encouraged because it fosters lasting knowledge and easy application of knowledge acquired in everyday life, the group work approach to teaching has been poorly managed and did not achieve desired results where it was used during this research. The participating biology students and teachers see the learner-centred pedagogy as slowing down the progression of teaching the content matter while the national examination covers the whole curriculum content. Therefore, although teachers were using different teaching approaches, once they are asked which approach they can choose to use, both students and teachers prefer to continue to use the teacher-centred approach in order to meet the content outcomes required in the national examination. Another result was that all participating students found their teachers supportive and nurturing and research is encouraged by all teachers regardless of their dominating teaching styles.