In the employment context employers may view certain conduct/behaviour committed by an employee or a group of employees to be repugnant and unacceptable resulting in the disciplinary action that may lead to a dismissal sanction taken against such employee or employees. Even though the employer has a right to discipline the employees for a contravention of a rule or a policy and even dismiss the employee/s involved, such a disciplinary action and dismissal must be based on a certain procedure where the principle of fairness must be adhered to. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“the Act”) and Schedule 8 of the Code of Good Practice deals with the aspects of dismissals related to conduct and capacity, however, each case is unique, it has to be approached on its own merits. Schedule 8(3) states that, “formal procedures in disciplinary measures do not have to be invoked every time a rule is broken or a standard is not met”. It is therefore necessary that there should be a disciplinary code which guides the workers and the employers, it must be clear and be understood by all the parties. The disciplinary code of conduct serves as the foundation of good discipline because everybody knows the consequences of his/her contravention of those guidelines enumerated in the Code of Conduct. The Code of Good Practice under Schedule 8(3), states that “while employees should be protected from arbitrary action, employers are entitled to satisfactory conduct and work performance from their employees”, so a very good relationship between the two parties is most important if there is to be stability and industrial peace in the workplace.

M.B.A. / A detailed, history of Skills Development has been presented by the Researcher in the literature review (Chapter 2) in order to provide readers, unfamiliar with South Africa's history, more perspective should they require it. The technical detail of the Skills Development Act as well as the myriad of acronyms used in the field is elaborated in detail in order to provide the reader with a more detailed understanding of the mechanics of the Act. This provides a framework for understanding why resistance is encountered by senior management and company owners with regard to committing their companies to the national skills drive. The objective of this study is to firstly to place the current status of Skills development in context by providing the historical perspective of Skills development in South Africa. Secondly, with the aid of questionnaires, the Researcher attempts to focus on the impact of the SDA on Courier companies, particularly in relation to past training habits and the current status quo. In this process, the extent of Senior Management knowledge and commitment is also uncovered. Finally, recommendations are submitted and then triangulated, by means of a focus group. This select group of current managers in the industry will assist by corroborating the findings and recommendations of this study. This was done, as there is a lack of published literature and research material on this subject in South Africa at present. The broader goals of the Act are firstly to create a prosperous and equitable society through economic growth and social development. The creation of employment requires a larger skills base and development of skills especially among previously disadvantaged individuals. Secondly, an increase in productivity is a priority for the South African Government, as it is widely known that South Africa does not rank highly on the global countries productivity scale. 4 Research will show that the impact of the Skills Development legislation has been most noticeable in the larger Courier companies. These large companies, previously invested substantial amounts of money in HR and training infrastructure, and now reap the financial rewards of that investment. As the large companies have the HR infrastructure to adhere to the detailed requirements of the Act, they capitalise on the rebates and discretionary grants available. Small to medium (SMME) courier companies are not adapting to the new processes and in many cases, are not complying with Skills legislation at all. SMME's lack the infrastructure required to introduce, implement and monitor the legislation in their organisations, they either don't comply, or hire consultants to window-dress the process in order to recoup a portion of the levies paid. The following solutions are proposed: A simple, uncomplicated administrative process allowing SMME's to register for the Skills Development Levy rebates. A sustained marketing drive (or awareness campaign) from Government (SETA's), focusing specifically on SMME's, is required in order to educate owners of SMME's with regard to the benefits of legislative compliance. Inclusion of Non-Governmental (NGO's) role-players, such as the Courier Associations, Bargaining Councils and training organisations, in a campaign to focus on the SMME's. Fewer administrative delays with regard to rebate payments from South African Revenue Services to the Levy payers which will further enhance the attractiveness of the process to SMME's

M.Ed. / The purpose of this study was to determine the educator's perception on the importance of the juridical facet of discipline. It also aimed to inform readers what the rights and duties of parents, teachers and children as far as discipline is concerned. The study is presented as follows: * Chapter 1 : Introduction * Chapter 2 '* Chapter 3 * Chapter 4 * Chapter 5 FINDINGS A study of literature on the juridical facet of discipline. The research plan. The assimilation and interpretation of the empirical data. Summary, conclusion and recommendations. * More woman than men had facet plays an important discipline. the opinion that the juridical part in the application of * Afrikaans mother tongue speakers valued the juridical facet higher than English mother tongue speakers. * More teachers than parents were of the opinion that the juridical facet plays an important role in the application of discipline. * Involvement of educationists either at primary- or secondary schools didn't influence their perception on the importance of the juridical facet. * The age of an educationist did have an influence on his view of the juridical facet of discipline. * Flat tenants regarded the juridical facet of discipline far more important than home residents did. * Christian educationists regarded the facet more important than non-Christians. * The mari tal status of educationists didn't have an influence discipline. on their perception of the juridical facet of * As far as income was concerned it became clear that the lower the income group the more important the juridical facet of discipline was regarded. CONCLUSION Ignorance of the law proves in many cases to be a problem in the application of discipline. Teachers and parents must therefore be thorougly informed about their roles in the juridical facet of discipline and must realize that they are partners in the disciplining of the child (Bondesio, 1989: 107) • It thus became evident that the juridical facet of discipline is regarded as highly important by most educationist

LL.M. / Please refer to full text to view abstract

Tax practitioners in South Africa have been operating in an unregulated tax industry. This has allowed certain tax practitioners to fail in their duties to their clients, as many do not have to abide by any code of conduct or ethical principles, to the detriment of the public. Other than the provisions in the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962, there has been no regulation. As a result of losses suffered by taxpayers either through the incompetence, ignorance or negligence of a tax practitioner, as substantiated by case law, and increased costs borne by the South African Revenue Services due to unnecessary queries and tax disputes, the Minister of Finance, Trevor Manuel, introduced the concept of tax industry regulation in his Budget Speech in 2002. This resulted in the introduction of section 67 A into the Income Tax Act, providing for a registration process for tax practitioners. All practising tax practitioners were required to register with the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services by 30 June 2005. In addition, a discussion paper was issued in 2002 setting out the proposal of the Revenue Services to regulate the tax industry through the formation of an Association of Tax Practitioners. This proposal includes various contentious issues and casts significant doubt on whether the proposed model is the most suitable. The goal of the research was therefore to evaluate the current status of tax advisory services in order to demonstrate the need for regulation and to compare the proposed SARS model with two established regulatory authorities: the Estate Agency Affairs Board and the Australian Tax Agents Board. A conceptual model for regulation was developed in order to test all the models against a simple regulatory framework to determine whether each was aligned to certain best practices proposed in this framework. The research methodology was qualitative in nature, involving the critical interpretation of documentary data and data generated during a public discussion forum of tax practitioners. It was concluded that the SARS proposal is too prescriptive and, at the same time, too broad in its scope. In order to address the key objective, identified as protection of the taxpaying public, a simplified regulation procedure was recommended, which would adhere to the proposed regulatory framework. / KMBT_363

This thesis traces the development of insubordination in the employment relationship. The essence of the relationship is that the employee, by contracting out his or her productive capacity, occupies a subordinate position. The primary aim is to locate and define the nature of subordination and to investigate how the breach of this position would justify dismissal as interpreted and applied by the courts. This is achieved by investigating dismissal for insubordination under the common law contract of employment, the unfair labour practice jurisdiction and the 1995 Labour Relations Act. Initially the obligation of the employee to be subordinate, an essential term of the contract of employment, is located and defined by using the tests of Control, Organisation and Dominant Impression, which theoretically indicate the true nature of insubordination. Insubordination under the common law is equated with disobedience to the lawful and reasonable instructions of the employer which were given in good faith and fell squarely within the contractual relationship. Insubordination under the unfair labour practice jurisdiction was equated with a challenge to the authority of the employer of which disobedience was a manifestation of such intention. Instructions given by the employer under the unfair labour practice jurisdiction had to be lawful, reasonable and fair. What was fair depended on the surrounding circumstances of the dismissal and a wilful and unreasonable refusal of the employee to obey the valid instructions of the employer justified dismissal Under the 1995 Labour Relations Act it is submitted that insubordination will be dealt with in essentially the same manner as under the previous jurisdiction, subject to the Act's objectives and purposes. The disobedience of the employee is to be tolerated if that employee is attempting to achieve the Act's objectives, and any dismissal as a result of the disobedience could be unfair, because the employer's conduct fiustrates the purpose of the Act. Therefore, the contractual right of the employer to expect subordination from the employee may have been whittled away to such an extent over time that it seems superficial to regard subordination as an essential term of the contract of employment.

The conflict between trade marks and domain names has been a major subject of legal debate over the past few years. The issues arising from the relationship between trade marks and domain names reveal the difficulties associated with attempts to establish mechanisms to address the problems existing between them. Trade mark laws have been adopted to resolve the trade mark and domain name conflict, resulting in more conflict. Domain name registers have to date been constructed on the basis of first come first served. Given that the generic indicators are very general, it has been inevitable that problems would arise, particularly once the commercial potential of the Internet began to be realised. Unlike domain names, trade marks are protected in ways which are more precise. Trade marks may not be imitated either exactly or in a manner so similar that it is likely to confuse a significant portion of the public. It is possible for more than one enterprise to use the same trade mark in respect of different goods, although this is not possible with domain names. This disparity in objectives leads to two core problems. The first problem relates to cybersquatters who deliberately secure Top Level Domains (TLDs) containing the names or marks of well known enterprises in order to sell them later. The second problem relates to the rival claims between parties who have genuine reasons for wanting particular TLDs, and problems associated with the resolution of such claims. The disputes between parties with legitimate conflicting interests in domain names are often not equitably and effectively resolved, thus compromising the rights of domain name holders. There is great activity in the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) to provide a more substantial system of governing and regulating the Internet. There is a strong movement to provide methods of arbitrating conflicts between honest claims to TLDs which conflict either in Internet terms or in trade mark law. However, these difficult policies remain to be settled. South Africa's progress towards the establishment of an effective mechanism to govern and regulate the Internet has been hindered by the absence of a policy to resolve domain related trade mark disputes. South Africa only recently drafted the South African Regulations for Alternative Domain Name Dispute Resolution (zaADRR), although the regulations have not yet been adopted. Therefore South African parties to domain name disputes continue to find solutions to their problems through the court system or foreign dispute resolution policies. The purpose of this study is firstly to examine and to comment on the basic issues of trade mark law and domain names in this area, with particular reference to South Africa, and secondly to examine the mechanisms in place for the resolution of trade mark and domain name disputes and to highlight the issues that flow from that. An additional purpose of this study is to discuss the policies of the dispute resolution mechanisms and to suggest how these policies can be improved.

The primary purpose of this treatise is to consider the development, analysis and application of the review test in relation to arbitration awards which is set out in the Constitutional Court (CC) judgment of Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others (Sidumo).1 This judgment has already had significant implications for employers and employees alike and will continue to do so in the future. Many lawyers, trade unions and employees launch or oppose review applications in the Labour Court on behalf of employers or employees. In observing this litigation process, it became clear that practitioners make two fundamental mistakes. Firstly they do not appreciate the distinction between reviews and appeals and / or, secondly, they misconstrue the Sidumo test in seeking to review or defend an arbitration award. This causes serious prejudice to their clients and results in delays in labour dispute resolution which is contrary to the spirit and purpose of the Labour Relations Act,2 as amended (LRA). The application of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,3 legislation and case law is fundamental to the review of arbitration awards and the role of arbitrators in that process. The common thread is the notion of “reasonableness” and “fairness” which has been and continues to be of significant importance in the assessment of arbitration awards. During the course of this research paper, reference is been made to the Constitution, legislation, case law, academic papers and journal articles. The references are mostly precedent setting and authoritative in relation to reviewable irregularities in arbitration awards. The purpose of this paper is guide and assist labour court practitioners to analyse arbitration awards and identify reviewable irregularities in order to determine whether it meets the bandwidth of reasonableness within the context of the Constitution and LRA. In doing so, practitioners will be able to successfully review awards without unduly delaying the dispute resolution process. During the research process, one of the important findings was that there has been inconsistent jurisprudence relating to the application of the grounds of review and the review test itself as per Sidumo which blurred the distinction between reviews and appeals. Many review applications failed to attack the reasonableness of the decision of the commissioner, but rather focused on the cogency of the evidence presented at the arbitration and thereby incorrectly invoking an appeal instead of a review. A further challenge was that the jurisprudence created a perception amongst practitioners that there was a decline in the Sidumo test. This approach was inherently incorrect and recent judgments have clarified and upheld the Sidumo test in review applications.4 The recent landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) clarified that reasonableness was not a separate ground of review but was to be suffused with the grounds of review set out in section 145(2)(a) of the LRA.5 Lastly, Sidumo did not postulate the bandwidth of reasonableness and it was left to the courts to determine the extent of judicial interference. There are various factors to be considered and CC judgments have provided much needed guidance on how to determine reasonableness. In essence, a wrong decision per se is not reviewable. At best, erroneous reasons or lack of proper reasons may serve as evidence for a reviewable ground that will together with other considerations require compelling proof to justify a court’s interpretation that the decision reached is not one that a reasonable decision could have reached.7 In order to obtain an award on the basis of the Sidumo test, the 4 Andre Herholdt v Nedbank [2013] 11 BLLR 1075 (SCA); Goldfields Mining South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA [2014] BLLR 20 (LAC). applicant must thus assail not only the commissioner’s reasons, but also the result of the award.

Previously, our workplaces were characterised by serious hardships emanating from labour laws which did not always cater for all areas of the employment relationship. South African female employees were without a clear legitimate remedial right precluding any severe violation and infringement to their fundamental rights resulting from their pregnancy; a task they did not opt for in the first place, but was instead, naturally imposed on them as a result of their gender category. Undoubtedly, many female employees were victims of unfair discrimination. The legislature therefore saw it fit to democratise the workplace by making rapid statutory interventions. As a result, a number of significant changes in various spheres of our labour laws were brought in. Amongst the greatly notable valuable changes was the introduction of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998. This piece of legislation has generally reformed our industrial society by bringing in the elimination of unfair discrimination and thereby enhancing the principle of equity in the workplace. The act has further touched a place within hearts of female employees for fear of discrimination as a result of their pregnancy status or any reasons related to their pregnancy. The act further codified Industrial Court decisions that were already established under the discrimination law jurisprudence from the Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956. The application of the provisions of the Act has made the employment relationship no longer to be a comfort zone for employers. These general changes to the law also impact on the dismissal law regime. The purpose of this treatise is to give an overview of the applicable legislation and contributions made by the Labour Courts in developing pregnancy dismissal and discrimination law. The Labour Courts have handed down few judgements that have helped in clarifying the provisions of both the current Labour Relations Act and the Employment Equity Act around the topic. One should hasten to say that this has never been a smooth process by the courts. It is further shown in this treatise that some of the court decisions were not well accepted in the light of other important considerations, such as the equality provisions of the Constitution. For the purpose of effectively dealing with this topic, this treatise contains a discussion of the historical context of discrimination law in the form of common-law position, and the discrimination law before the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. It then endeavours to identify the legislative provision of the Act when it comes to discrimination law provisions. At the same time the important court decisions that were made are identified and examined.

This treatise interrogates the concept of bumping and commences with the background and rationale to the study. It poses a problem statement and sets out the aims and objectives it intends to achieve by virtue of specific research questions identified in the first chapter. The second chapter deals with the history and origin of the concept of bumping whereafter it elaborates on the evolution of bumping in the South African labour-law context and it furthermore introduces the retrenchment guidelines as drafted by Halton Cheadle in 1985. A review and reappraisal of the retrenchment guidelines by Andre van Niekerk are also raised in the second chapter. This is followed by a discussion on the aspects relating to fair selection criteria as pronounced by South African labour-law jurisprudence and deals specifically with the concept of LIFO and the employment universe. The third chapter also raises the various forms of bumping, as well as applicable limitations thereto. Following an in-depth look at the South African courts’ interpretation of bumping-related scenarios, a comparison with international standards is launched whereby relevant ILO recommendations are used as reference. An interpretation of United Kingdom case law is discussed, whereafter it is compared with the South African approach. The fifth chapter deals with the legislative requirements for fair dismissals and fair retrenchment dismissals in particular. The nexus between substantive and procedural fairness requirements is highlighted and the remainder of the fifth chapter deals with procedural fairness requirements which would be applicable in bumping-related retrenchment scenarios. The final chapter briefly alludes to whether bumping should be categorised as a genuine alternative to retrenchment, or merely as an extension of LIFO as a selection criterion. The treatise concludes with procedural recommendations in dealing with bumped employees in the form of retrenchment guidelines for consultations with employees affected by bumping.