1 |
Dostoyevsky and Andreyev gazers upon the abyss,King, Henry Hall, January 1936 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1936. / Vita. Bibliography: p. [86]-88.
|
2 |
Dostoyevsky and Andreyev gazers upon the abyss,King, Henry Hall, January 1936 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1936. / Vita. Bibliography: p. [86]-88.
|
3 |
Leonid Leonov's artistic evolution a study of four major novels /Iwanchuk-Schnoes, Marie Larissa, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1975. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 273-282).
|
4 |
Leonid Leonov’s Vor : a Soviet paradise lostStelmaszynski, Margaret Burgess January 1977 (has links)
There is a striking contrast in the assessments by Western critics of the two variants of Leonid Leonov's novel, Vor (The Thief): whereas the original version (1927) is frequently acclaimed as the finest and most artistically honest of all his literary endeavours, Leonov's revision of the work (1959) is generally viewed as evidence of his final capitulation to the dictates of socialist realist doctrine.
The present study was initiated as an attempt to elucidate certain obscure thematic and symbolic elements perceived during a concentrated examination of the first novel only. Gradually, however, as the significance of thesi elements became increasingly more evident, attention was shifted to the revision to determine whether or not they had survived the destructive influences of indoctrination and time. If they had been preserved, and the difficulties arrising from the obscurity of their presentation could be overcome, then Leonov's tarnished reputation in the West was decidedly undeserved.
Surprisingly, those elements most crucial to the elusive message of the original have not merely survived, but have often been clarified and elaborated as well. The key to their understanding lies in the recognition of a level of narration "higher" than that of the everyday reality of socially and politically oriented circumstances and events. For, in addition to his concern with topical issues, Leonov reveals a profound interest in the great metaphysical conflicts
that are eternally re-enacted within the confines of the human soul. The vehicle for his depiction of these conflicts
is a network of symbolism, primarily Biblical in origin,
which has as its basis the epic myth of "Paradise Lost." The exegesis of this symbolic framework has been divided into five chapters: I) Introduction, II) Paradise Lost, III) Paradise Regained, IV) Paradise Rejected, or the Theory of Progress, and V) Conclusions.
Chapter I sets the stage for the analysis by placing the tragic "riddle" of human existence (the conflict of Good versus Evil) in the context of the "march of the generations," or history.
Chapter II shows how the metaphysical rebellion (or "fall") of Dmitry Vekshin (Leonov1s "universal Adam") is reflected
in the symbolic nucleus of the novel, the "blighted birch," and outlines the implications of this parallel for the fates of Vekshin and of Russia.
As the tragedy of the fallen Adam led to the promise of the risen Christ, so the spiritual death signified by Vekshin
1s own "fall" leads to the potentiality of his "rebirth." Chapter III locates Leonov's discussion of this possibility in a polyphonic schematization of characters and events that
is highly reminiscent of Dostoevsky,
Chapter IV focuses on Vekshin's rejection of salvation
and on the revised novel's greatly elaborated "theory of human progress," in which Leonov describes the conflict between "happiness" and "hope," between consideration for individual human beings and the abstract idea of a "greater human good." Dmitry Vekshin's. rejection of "Paradise" ultimately signifies the author's own lack of faith in the Communist ideal.
In conclusion, Chapter V discusses specific indications
of Leonov's awareness of the subversive nature of his ideas, and of the dangers to which he is consequently exposed.
It is a highly ironic measure of his success that Leonov's survival in Soviet society should have won him such acclaim in the Soviet Union and such condemnation in the free world. In any case, his achievements as an artist have been attained at immense personal cost, and it is time they were recognized for their true value. / Arts, Faculty of / Central Eastern Northern European Studies, Department of / Graduate
|
5 |
Minimalismus : Leonid Dobyčins Prosa im Kontext der totalitären Ästhetik /Schramm, Caroline, January 1999 (has links)
Diss.--Lett.--Konstanz--Univ., 1998. / Bibliogr. p. 283-297. Notes bibliogr.
|
6 |
A critical study of the work of Leonid LeonovThomson, R. D. B. January 1965 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The Production Analysis of Leonid Andreyev's He Who Gets SlappedLiggett, Lucy Ann January 1955 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
The Production Analysis of Leonid Andreyev's He Who Gets SlappedLiggett, Lucy Ann January 1955 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
Post-soviet Political Transformation In Ukraine (1991-2004)Simsek, Elif 01 November 2005 (has links) (PDF)
This thesis seeks to examine the post-Soviet political transformation in Ukraine between 1991 and 2004. Since Ukraine declared independence in 1991, the problems of political transformation to democracy in Ukraine have affected the outbreak of the Orange Revolution. The thesis attempts to examine the problems of post-Soviet political transformation in Ukraine under Leonid Kravchuk and Leonid Kuchma in order to analyse the dynamics of the Orange Revolution in 2004. The dynamics of the Orange Revolution are in part a result of the mass movements against the ongoing problems of the post-Soviet political transformation to democracy in Ukraine. This thesis also argues that the Orange Revolution does not indicate the conclusion of the political transformation in Ukraine, since the problems of the political transformation in Ukraine still remain as it has been seen in the short-term evolution of the political progress of Viktor Yushchenko, who elected to the presidency in the 2004 presidential elections.
|
10 |
Summity Nixon-Brežněv v letech 1973 a 1974 v československém tisku / Nixon-BreznevSummits in 1973 and 1974 in Czechoslovakian PressKvapilík, Ondřej January 2012 (has links)
The diploma thesis named "Nixon-Brezhnev Summits in 1973 and 1974 in Czechoslovakian Press" deals with the presentation of summits between Leonid Brezhnev and Richard Nixon in contemporary Czechoslovakian dailies. It analyzes texts published by the media concerning the meetings in 1973 and 1974 in Washington and Moscow in the set period of more than one month around the meetings. Not only does the thesis research the degree of bias of the media content due to the ideological inclination towards the Soviet Union. It also analyzes the way in which the media in Czechoslovakia dealt with the presentation of both the enemy superpowers as partners. The theory part provides in introduction of the topic and basic historical context of the events. Furthermore it characterizes the respective meetings and the analyzed dailies. The practical part covers detailed qualitative content analysis of the selected representatives of the contemporary Czechoslovakian press, namely Rudé právo, Svobodné slovo, Mladá fronta and Lidová demokracie. Then the thesis compares the presentation of the respective summits and attempts to find the causes of the differences and trends in the in the presentation. As an addition the thesis also provides a comparison with similar meetings between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev,...
|
Page generated in 0.0361 seconds