No description available.

No description available.

The r-out-of-n F-system and load-sharing system are very common in industrial engineering. Statistical inference has been developed here for an equal-load sharing r-out-of-n F-system on Birnbaum-Sauders (BS) lifetime distribution. A simulation study is carried out with different parameter values and different censoring rates in order to examine the performance of the proposed estimation method. Moreover, to find maximum likelihood estimates numerically, three methods of finding initial values for the parameters - pseudo complete sample method, Type-II modified moment estimators of BS distribution method and stochastic approximation method - are developed. These three methods are then compared based on the number of iterations and simulation time. Two real data sets and one simulated data set are used for illustrative purposes. Finally, some concluding comments are made including possible future directions for investigation. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)

The alleged privacy paradox states that individuals report high values for personal privacy, while at the same time they report behavior that contradicts a high privacy value. This is a misconception. Reported privacy behaviors are explained by asymmetric subjective beliefs. Beliefs may or may not be uncertain, and non-neutral attitudes towards uncertainty are not necessary to explain behavior. This research was conducted in three related parts. Part one presents an experiment in individual decision making under uncertainty. Ellsberg's canonical two-color choice problem was used to estimate attitudes towards uncertainty. Subjects believed bets on the color ball drawn from Ellsberg's ambiguous urn were equally likely to pay. Estimated attitudes towards uncertainty were insignificant. Subjective expected utility explained subjects' choices better than uncertainty aversion and the uncertain priors model. A second treatment tested Vernon Smith's conjecture that preferences in Ellsberg's problem would be unchanged when the ambiguous lottery is replaced by a compound objective lottery. The use of an objective compound lottery to induce uncertainty did not affect subjects' choices. The second part of this dissertation extended the concept of uncertainty to commodities where quality and accuracy of a quality report were potentially ambiguous. The uncertain priors model is naturally extended to allow for potentially different attitudes towards these two sources of uncertainty, quality and accuracy. As they relate to privacy, quality and accuracy of a quality report are seen as metaphors for online security and consumer trust in e-commerce, respectively. The results of parametric structural tests were mixed. Subjects made choices consistent with neutral attitudes towards uncertainty in both the quality and accuracy domains. However, allowing for uncertainty aversion in the quality domain and not the accuracy domain outperformed the alternative which only allowed for uncertainty aversion in the accuracy domain. Finally, part three integrated a public-goods game and punishment opportunities with the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism to elicit privacy values, replicating previously reported privacy behaviors. The procedures developed elicited punishment (consequence) beliefs and information confidentiality beliefs in the context of individual privacy decisions. Three contributions are made to the literature. First, by using cash rewards as a mechanism to map actions to consequences, the study eliminated hypothetical bias as a confounding behavioral factor which is pervasive in the privacy literature. Econometric results support the 'privacy paradox' at levels greater than 10 percent. Second, the roles of asymmetric beliefs and attitudes towards uncertainty were identified using parametric structural likelihood methods. Subjects were, in general, uncertainty neutral and believed 'bad' events were more likely to occur when their private information was not confidential. A third contribution is a partial test to determine which uncertain process, loss of privacy or the resolution of consequences, is of primary importance to individual decision-makers. Choices were consistent with uncertainty neutral preferences in both the privacy and consequences domains.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Grapheme-color synesthesia, wherein achromatic graphemes are experienced as chromatic, presents insights into how the brain integrates subjective experiences. The neural correlates of grapheme-color synesthesia are highly debated, with the field full of inconsistent results. To compile the existing functional magnetic resonance imaging literature on grapheme-color synesthesia, the present thesis combined a systematic review with two coordinate-based Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses. Two separate analyses were conducted to see whether investigating synesthesia through chromatic stimuli and incongruency effects would lead to the same activation patterns as investigating it through achromatic stimuli. Therefore, the main analysis included ten studies and more heterogeneity through chromatic stimuli, while the strict analysis had five studies but only achromatic stimuli and thus less heterogeneity. These analyses found convergent activation in the parietal lobe in the main analysis and the frontal lobe in the strict analysis. Although only limited interpretations of the results can be made, the present meta-analyses provided insights into the current state of research on grapheme-color synesthesia. Because the lack of comparability and methodological consensus in the field of synesthesia is evident, further research efforts are encouraged for the field to reach a state where truly convergent findings can be detected.

Many common statistical techniques for modeling multidimensional dynamic data sets can be seen as variants of one (or multiple) underlying linear/nonlinear model(s). These statistical techniques fall into two broad categories of supervised and unsupervised learning. The emphasis of this dissertation is on unsupervised learning under multiple generative models. For linear models, this has been achieved by collective observations and derivations made by previous authors during the last few decades. Factor analysis, polynomial chaos expansion, principal component analysis, gaussian mixture clustering, vector quantization, and Kalman filter models can all be unified as some variations of unsupervised learning under a single basic linear generative model. Hidden Markov modeling (HMM), however, is categorized as an unsupervised learning under multiple linear/nonlinear generative models. This dissertation is primarily focused on hidden Markov models (HMMs). On the first half of this dissertation we study enhancements on the theory of hidden Markov modeling. These include three branches: 1) a robust as well as a closed-form parameter estimation solution to the expectation maximization (EM) process of HMMs for the case of elliptically symmetrical densities; 2) a two-step HMM, with a combined state sequence via an extended Viterbi algorithm for smoother state estimation; and 3) a duration-dependent HMM, for estimating the expected residency frequency on each state. Then, the second half of the dissertation studies three novel applications of these methods: 1) the applications of Markov switching models on the Bifurcation Theory in nonlinear dynamics; 2) a Game Theory application of HMM, based on fundamental theory of card counting and an example on the game of Baccarat; and 3) Trust modeling and the estimation of trustworthiness metrics in cyber security systems via Markov switching models. As a result of the duration dependent HMM, we achieved a better estimation for the expected duration of stay on each regime. Then by robust and closed form solution to the EM algorithm we achieved robustness against outliers in the training data set as well as higher computational efficiency in the maximization step of the EM algorithm. By means of the two-step HMM we achieved smoother probability estimation with higher likelihood than the standard HMM. / Ph. D.