published_or_final_version / Dentistry / Master / Master of Dental Surgery

published_or_final_version / Dentistry / Master / Master of Dental Surgery

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität zu Köln, 1972. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. 124-128).

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität zu Köln, 1972. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 124-128).

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / The Riley Children's Hospital Craniofacial Anomalies Team rigorously follows a treatment protocol developed by Dr. Sheldon Rosenstein for the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients. Rosenstein's protocol incorporates primary bone grafting and alveolar molding appliances for cleft lip and palate patients. While other cleft lip and palate treatment centers utilize alveolar molding appliances, there remains debate concerning the efficacy of primary bone grafting. The principal detraction of primary bone grafting is the concern that such early surgical treatment affects maxillary and craniofacial growth and development. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze post-treatment lateral head plates and dental casts of cleft lip and palate circumpubertal patients treated in infancy at Riley Hospital in Indianapolis by the Craniofacial Team following Rosenstein's protocol. The hypothesis was that primary alveolar bone grafting in conjunction with the use of alveolar molding appliances contributes to the early stabilization of the alveolar segments, and produces no statistically significant difference in craniofacial development among primary bone grafted patients and nongrafted patients. The dental arch dimensions of the nongrafted patients (control group) consisted of the same data utilized by Moorrees in his study of the dentition of the growing child. The dental arch dimensions of nongrafted cleft patients consisted of the same data utilized by Athanasiou in his study of the dentition of cleft patients treated surgically without bone grafting. Of the eight measurements made by the three examiners, six demonstrated excellent interexaminer agreement, one demonstrated moderate interexaminer agreement, and one demonstrated poor interexaminer agreement. The arch width and length for the grafted group was significantly smaller (p < .05, Student's t-test) than the normal group in all measures except for the mandibular canine width. The arch width and length for the grafted group was not significantly different (p < .05, Student's t-test) than the nongrafted group, except for the maxillary molar width where the grafted group was smaller than the nongrafted group. The cephalometric values of the Riley group were compared against a nongrafted group, an early primary grafted group, and the Bolton standard values cited in Rosenstein's study. The Bolton standard values were used as the control group. This study found the cephalometric values of the Riley experimental group (treated following Rosenstein's protocol) to be of no statistically significant difference (p < .05, Students t-test) when compared with cephalometric values of the nongrafted and primary alveolar grafted groups cited in Rosenstein's 1982 study. The cephalometric values of the Riley experimental group were less than the cephalometric values of the nonclefted patients (Bolton standard control group) cited in Rosenstein's 1982 study. Interexaminer agreement ranged from poor to good with the poorest agreement among the linear values of ANS/PNS and GO/ME. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for SNA,m ANB, and SNB ranged from fair to moderate. The Riley cephalometric values were equal or slightly better than Rosenstein's grafted and nongrafted groups. Though smaller than the control group, the Riley cephalometric values were of no statistical significance (p < .05, Students t-test) when compared with the same parameters cited in Rosenstein's study. Although these findings infer that the patients treated following Rosenstein's protocol demonstrate some degree of craniofacial growth attenuation when compared with nonclefted patients (Bolton standard control group), the Riley patients showed no worse growth attenuation than similar patients treated without Rosenstein's protocol for primary alveolar grafting. The hypothesis of this thesis was that Rosenstein's protocol was viable and non-detrimental when compared with other treatment regimens. The results of this study support the hypothesis that Rosenstein's surgical protocol is not a contributing factor in craniofacial growth attenuation among cleft lip and palate patients.

Introdução: As fissuras bilaterais de lábio e palato sempre apresentaram divergências a respeito de seu tratamento cirúrgico. Nesta pesquisa duas técnicas cirúrgicas para correção de fissuras de lábio bilaterais, a Clássica de Spina (grupo S) e a de Spina modificada pelo Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de São Paulo (HRAC-USP) (grupo TD) foram comparadas. Os objetivos deste estudo foram: determinar os resultados estéticos, as complicações pós-operatórias imediatas e mediatas, a satisfação pessoal da aparência e do tratamento recebido, bem como a qualidade de vida em indivíduos com fissuras transforame bilateral, operados no HRAC-USP pelas técnicas de Spina e Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP. Método: Após aprovação do comitê de ética e pesquisa e obtenção do consentimento informado, foram avaliados setenta e seis indivíduos, 48 do sexo masculino e 28 do sexo feminino. O grupo S apresentou-se com 44 indivíduos e o grupo TD com 32. Julgadores fizeram análises subjetivas em fotografias de sete atributos em cada indivíduo, utilisando-se de uma escala numérica de 1 a 5. Da análise de prontuários foram obtidas as complicações pós operatórias imediatas e mediatas, além do número de internações cirúrgicas e do número de retornos ambulatoriais. Os próprios indivíduos responderam a duas escalas visuais analógicas (EVA), uma de satisfação da sua aparência e outra do tratamento recebido no HRAC-USP e também a um questionário de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL-bref). Resultados: As duas técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas não mostraram diferença estatística nas análises fotográficas subjetivas. As complicações cirúrgicas imediatas e mediatas foram semelhantes entre os grupos. Houve diferença estatística significante quanto ao número de cirurgias (p=0,0000), o grupo S apresentou 8,06 (2,18) e o grupo TD apresentou 4,72 (1,45) internações cirúrgicas, os atendimentos ambulatoriais não apresentaram diferenças apresentando para o grupo S 27,49 (17,58) e 22,31 (15,38) vindas ao hospital. As escalas visuais analógicas (EVA) de satisfação da aparência apresentaram para o grupo S 53,80 (14,46) e TD 57,54 (14,41) e do tratamento recebido no HRAC-USP para S 68,14 (11,16) e TD 63,18 (11,39). O WHOQOL-bref também não mostrou diferença entre os grupos em nenhum dos seus domínios. Conclusão: As queiloplastias realizadas pelas técnicas de Spina e de Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP, não mostraram diferença estatística nos resultados das avaliações fotográficas, das complicações pós operatórias imediatas e mediatas, do número de atendimentos ambulatoriais, das escalas visuais analógicas de satisfação da aparência e do atendimento recebido no HRAC-USP, e do questionário de qualidade de vida. Os indivíudos operados pela técnica de Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP apresentaram menos internações cirúrgicas que indivíduos os operados pela técnica clássica de Spina, com resultados estatísticos significativos. / Background: The bilateral cleft lip palate ever had a divergence of its treatment. In this research two techniques to correction bilateral cleft lip, Spina classic technique (S group) and Spina modified by HRAC-USP (TD group). Aims: Determine the esthetical results, immediate and mediate postoperative complications, the number of surgeries and ambulatory attendance, the personal satisfaction with its appearance and received attendance, and the quality of life in subjects with bilateral clef lip palate, operated in the HRAC-USP by Spina and Spina modified by HRACUSP techniques of cheiloplasty. Method: After approve of the ethical committee and attainment of assent, was evaluated 74 subjects, 46 male and 28 female. The S group had 42 and the TD group with 32 subjects. Judges made facial analysis in photographs of seven attributes in each subject, using an analogical scale of 1 to 5. From the bedside assessment the immediate and mediate complications was taken. The number of surgical procedures and ambulatorial coming was tabulated. The own subjects answer two visual analogical scale (EVA) of satisfaction of appearance and the treatment received at HRAC-USP and an OMS quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-bref). Results: The two techniques utilized did not show statistic difference in the subjective facial analyses. The immediate and mediate complications were similar between the groups. There were significant difference in the number of surgical procedures (p=0000), S group had 8,06 (± 2,18) and TD group 4,72 (± 1,45) surgical internment. The ambulatory coming did not show differences, the S group had 27,49 (± 17,58) and TD 22,31 (± 15,38) coming to to the Hospital. The visual analogical scales (EVA) of satisfaction whit the appearance shows for S group 53,80 (± 14,46) e TD 57,54 (± 14,41) and the do treatment received at HRAC-USP for S group 68,14 (± 11,16) e TD 63,18 (± 11,39). The WHOQOL-bref did not show differences between the groups in none of their dominion. Discussion: All elements of this work were interpreted and analysis was performed whit literature correlation. Conclusion: The cheiloplasty whit the technique of Spina and Spina modified by HRAC-USP, did not show statistical difference in the results of photographs evaluation, immediate e mediate complications, the number of coming to the hospital, the visual analogical scale of satisfaction whit the appearance and the treatment received at HRAC-USP and the questionnaire of quality of life. The subjects submitted to the Spina technique modified by HRAC-USP shows less surgical procedures that those submitted to the classical Spina technique whit statistical significance difference.

Introdução: As fissuras bilaterais de lábio e palato sempre apresentaram divergências a respeito de seu tratamento cirúrgico. Nesta pesquisa duas técnicas cirúrgicas para correção de fissuras de lábio bilaterais, a Clássica de Spina (grupo S) e a de Spina modificada pelo Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de São Paulo (HRAC-USP) (grupo TD) foram comparadas. Os objetivos deste estudo foram: determinar os resultados estéticos, as complicações pós-operatórias imediatas e mediatas, a satisfação pessoal da aparência e do tratamento recebido, bem como a qualidade de vida em indivíduos com fissuras transforame bilateral, operados no HRAC-USP pelas técnicas de Spina e Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP. Método: Após aprovação do comitê de ética e pesquisa e obtenção do consentimento informado, foram avaliados setenta e seis indivíduos, 48 do sexo masculino e 28 do sexo feminino. O grupo S apresentou-se com 44 indivíduos e o grupo TD com 32. Julgadores fizeram análises subjetivas em fotografias de sete atributos em cada indivíduo, utilisando-se de uma escala numérica de 1 a 5. Da análise de prontuários foram obtidas as complicações pós operatórias imediatas e mediatas, além do número de internações cirúrgicas e do número de retornos ambulatoriais. Os próprios indivíduos responderam a duas escalas visuais analógicas (EVA), uma de satisfação da sua aparência e outra do tratamento recebido no HRAC-USP e também a um questionário de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL-bref). Resultados: As duas técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas não mostraram diferença estatística nas análises fotográficas subjetivas. As complicações cirúrgicas imediatas e mediatas foram semelhantes entre os grupos. Houve diferença estatística significante quanto ao número de cirurgias (p=0,0000), o grupo S apresentou 8,06 (2,18) e o grupo TD apresentou 4,72 (1,45) internações cirúrgicas, os atendimentos ambulatoriais não apresentaram diferenças apresentando para o grupo S 27,49 (17,58) e 22,31 (15,38) vindas ao hospital. As escalas visuais analógicas (EVA) de satisfação da aparência apresentaram para o grupo S 53,80 (14,46) e TD 57,54 (14,41) e do tratamento recebido no HRAC-USP para S 68,14 (11,16) e TD 63,18 (11,39). O WHOQOL-bref também não mostrou diferença entre os grupos em nenhum dos seus domínios. Conclusão: As queiloplastias realizadas pelas técnicas de Spina e de Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP, não mostraram diferença estatística nos resultados das avaliações fotográficas, das complicações pós operatórias imediatas e mediatas, do número de atendimentos ambulatoriais, das escalas visuais analógicas de satisfação da aparência e do atendimento recebido no HRAC-USP, e do questionário de qualidade de vida. Os indivíudos operados pela técnica de Spina modificada pelo HRAC-USP apresentaram menos internações cirúrgicas que indivíduos os operados pela técnica clássica de Spina, com resultados estatísticos significativos. / Background: The bilateral cleft lip palate ever had a divergence of its treatment. In this research two techniques to correction bilateral cleft lip, Spina classic technique (S group) and Spina modified by HRAC-USP (TD group). Aims: Determine the esthetical results, immediate and mediate postoperative complications, the number of surgeries and ambulatory attendance, the personal satisfaction with its appearance and received attendance, and the quality of life in subjects with bilateral clef lip palate, operated in the HRAC-USP by Spina and Spina modified by HRACUSP techniques of cheiloplasty. Method: After approve of the ethical committee and attainment of assent, was evaluated 74 subjects, 46 male and 28 female. The S group had 42 and the TD group with 32 subjects. Judges made facial analysis in photographs of seven attributes in each subject, using an analogical scale of 1 to 5. From the bedside assessment the immediate and mediate complications was taken. The number of surgical procedures and ambulatorial coming was tabulated. The own subjects answer two visual analogical scale (EVA) of satisfaction of appearance and the treatment received at HRAC-USP and an OMS quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-bref). Results: The two techniques utilized did not show statistic difference in the subjective facial analyses. The immediate and mediate complications were similar between the groups. There were significant difference in the number of surgical procedures (p=0000), S group had 8,06 (± 2,18) and TD group 4,72 (± 1,45) surgical internment. The ambulatory coming did not show differences, the S group had 27,49 (± 17,58) and TD 22,31 (± 15,38) coming to to the Hospital. The visual analogical scales (EVA) of satisfaction whit the appearance shows for S group 53,80 (± 14,46) e TD 57,54 (± 14,41) and the do treatment received at HRAC-USP for S group 68,14 (± 11,16) e TD 63,18 (± 11,39). The WHOQOL-bref did not show differences between the groups in none of their dominion. Discussion: All elements of this work were interpreted and analysis was performed whit literature correlation. Conclusion: The cheiloplasty whit the technique of Spina and Spina modified by HRAC-USP, did not show statistical difference in the results of photographs evaluation, immediate e mediate complications, the number of coming to the hospital, the visual analogical scale of satisfaction whit the appearance and the treatment received at HRAC-USP and the questionnaire of quality of life. The subjects submitted to the Spina technique modified by HRAC-USP shows less surgical procedures that those submitted to the classical Spina technique whit statistical significance difference.