Spelling suggestions: "subject:"loopbaan"" "subject:"loopbaanbestuur""
1 |
The psychometric evaluation and predictors for two subjective career success instruments / Audine Marlé du ToitDu Toit, Audine Marlé January 2014 (has links)
Subjective career success has been the focus of research for a number of years. The term
refers to the individual’s personal perception of how successful he/she is in a career. In many
qualitative studies subjective career success is found to be a multi-dimensional construct.
Although there are quantitative instruments that measure subjective career success, they do
not measure the construct on multiple dimensions. The first objective of this study was to
determine the validity and reliability of two existing multi-dimensional instruments that
measure subjective career success, especially in the South African context. These are the
Perceived Career Success Scale (Gattiker & Larwood, 1986) and the Life-success Measures
Scale (Parker & Chusmir, 1992).
The second objective was to determine which predictors can be found for subjective career
success. Literature differentiates between three broad categories of variables, namely
demographical (gender, language group, marital status and age), human capital (job tenure,
level of education and career planning) and organisational variables (perceived organisational
support and training, and development opportunities).
A convenience sample of 754 personnel from the South African Police Service was taken at
stations and training colleges in the Free State, South Africa. A measuring battery that
assesses subjective career success was used. This entailed the Perceived Career Success Scale
as well as the Life-success Measures Scale. In addition, questions were used to ascertain the
three types of variables demographic (gender, language group, marital status and age), human
capital (job tenure, level of education and career planning) and organisational variables
(perceived organisational support and training and development opportunities).
The following statistical analyses were done to analyse the data: descriptive and inferential
statistics, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, product-moment correlations, confirmatory factor
analysis and linear regression analysis. The results of these analyses indicate that subjective career success is indeed a multi-dimensional construct. Three dimensions (job success,
interpersonal success and non-organisational success) of the Perceived Career Success Scale
(Gattiker & Larwood, 1986) could be established. These dimensions yielded good reliability,
but the validity remained problematic. In contrast, the Life-success Measures Scale (Parker &
Chusmir, 1992) yielded four dimensions (security, social contribution, professional fulfilment
and personal fulfilment). The psychometric properties of these dimensions were acceptable
and showed to be reliable and valid.
In addition, various demographic, human capital and organisational variables were found to
be predictors of subjective career success. Career planning, training and developmental
opportunities, as well as perceived organisational support, explained the most variance.
Various recommendations were made for the context of the South African Police Service, and
also for future research. The organisation is advised to apply the results from this study to
adjust policies and practices in such a way that employees will experience higher levels of
subjective career success. Furthermore, career discussions may be held in order to enhance
opportunities for career planning and provide opportunities for relevant training and
development that are aligned to the business drive of the organisation. Interventions that will
increase perceived organisational support and congenial relationships could be implemented
and maintained.
More research on the two subjective career success measures is needed, in order to 1) verify
the validity of the Perceived Career Success Scale and 2) to apply it and the Life-success
Measures Scale to other sectors and industries. It is also recommended that a more
heterogeneous sample be utilised as well as longitudinal research designs in future research
studies relating to subjective career success. / MCom (Industrial Psychology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
2 |
The psychometric evaluation and predictors for two subjective career success instruments / Audine Marlé du ToitDu Toit, Audine Marlé January 2014 (has links)
Subjective career success has been the focus of research for a number of years. The term
refers to the individual’s personal perception of how successful he/she is in a career. In many
qualitative studies subjective career success is found to be a multi-dimensional construct.
Although there are quantitative instruments that measure subjective career success, they do
not measure the construct on multiple dimensions. The first objective of this study was to
determine the validity and reliability of two existing multi-dimensional instruments that
measure subjective career success, especially in the South African context. These are the
Perceived Career Success Scale (Gattiker & Larwood, 1986) and the Life-success Measures
Scale (Parker & Chusmir, 1992).
The second objective was to determine which predictors can be found for subjective career
success. Literature differentiates between three broad categories of variables, namely
demographical (gender, language group, marital status and age), human capital (job tenure,
level of education and career planning) and organisational variables (perceived organisational
support and training, and development opportunities).
A convenience sample of 754 personnel from the South African Police Service was taken at
stations and training colleges in the Free State, South Africa. A measuring battery that
assesses subjective career success was used. This entailed the Perceived Career Success Scale
as well as the Life-success Measures Scale. In addition, questions were used to ascertain the
three types of variables demographic (gender, language group, marital status and age), human
capital (job tenure, level of education and career planning) and organisational variables
(perceived organisational support and training and development opportunities).
The following statistical analyses were done to analyse the data: descriptive and inferential
statistics, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, product-moment correlations, confirmatory factor
analysis and linear regression analysis. The results of these analyses indicate that subjective career success is indeed a multi-dimensional construct. Three dimensions (job success,
interpersonal success and non-organisational success) of the Perceived Career Success Scale
(Gattiker & Larwood, 1986) could be established. These dimensions yielded good reliability,
but the validity remained problematic. In contrast, the Life-success Measures Scale (Parker &
Chusmir, 1992) yielded four dimensions (security, social contribution, professional fulfilment
and personal fulfilment). The psychometric properties of these dimensions were acceptable
and showed to be reliable and valid.
In addition, various demographic, human capital and organisational variables were found to
be predictors of subjective career success. Career planning, training and developmental
opportunities, as well as perceived organisational support, explained the most variance.
Various recommendations were made for the context of the South African Police Service, and
also for future research. The organisation is advised to apply the results from this study to
adjust policies and practices in such a way that employees will experience higher levels of
subjective career success. Furthermore, career discussions may be held in order to enhance
opportunities for career planning and provide opportunities for relevant training and
development that are aligned to the business drive of the organisation. Interventions that will
increase perceived organisational support and congenial relationships could be implemented
and maintained.
More research on the two subjective career success measures is needed, in order to 1) verify
the validity of the Perceived Career Success Scale and 2) to apply it and the Life-success
Measures Scale to other sectors and industries. It is also recommended that a more
heterogeneous sample be utilised as well as longitudinal research designs in future research
studies relating to subjective career success. / MCom (Industrial Psychology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
3 |
Personal branding and career success : an empirical investigationCoetzer, Esme 30 October 2019 (has links)
Knowledge about personal branding, the development and sustaining of a personal
brand and the link between personal branding and career success did not exist in a
scientifically structured manner. The purpose of this study was to understand what the
elements of personal branding are and what it takes to develop a personal brand in
the corporate environment. It was also important to identify whether personal branding
is key to career success. The systematic literature review procedure was used to
identify, analyse and critically evaluate both empirical studies and popular literature
relating to personal branding. The current body of knowledge was ill defined and a six
step model detailing how to develop and maintain a personal brand was developed as
a result of a content analysis of the available popular literature. A measure of a
complete personal brand within the workplace was subsequently developed. In this
study, the hypotheses of a possible relationship between personal branding and
career success (performance appraisal score, 360 leadership evaluation and talent
board placement) were tested. It was found that talent board placement was
statistically significant and practically related to personal branding. The study was the
first to provide a measurement tool as well as empirical evidence on the relationship
between personal branding and career success and, as such contributed significantly
to the body of knowledge. This study also opened avenues for further research. / Daar was min kennis oor ’n persoonlike handelsmerk, die ontwikkeling en handhawing
van ’n persoonlike handelsmerk, en die verband tussen ’n persoonlike handelsmerk
en loopbaansukses in die wetenskaplike domein beskikbaar. Die doel van hierdie
studie was om die elemente van ’n persoonlike handelsmerk te begryp, asook om te
bepaal wat dit behels om ’n persoonlike handelsmerk in die korporatiewe omgewing
te ontwikkel. Dit was ook belangrik om te bepaal of ’n persoonlike handelsmerk
deurslaggewend is tot loopbaansukses. ‘n Sistematiese literatuuroorsig is gedoen om
empiriese studies asook gewilde literatuur oor ’n persoonlike handelsmerk te
identifiseer, te ontleed en krities te evalueer. Gegewe beperkte akademiese
kennismateriaal, en na aanleiding van die inhoudsontleding van die beskikbare
gewilde literatuur, is ’n sesstapmodel ontwikkel om aan te dui hoe ’n persoonlike
handelsmerk ontwikkel en gehandhaaf kan word. Na aanleiding hiervan is ’n
instrument ontwikkel om ’n person se handelsmerk omvattend in die werkplek te meet.
Dit is gevolg deur hipoteses van ’n moontlike verband tussen ’n persoonlike
handelsmerk en loopbaansukses (prestasiebeoordelingtelling, 360-leierskapevaluasie
en talentplasing) te toets. Die studie het bevind dat ’n persoonlike handelsmerk
statisties beduidend en prakties relevant is tot talentplasing. Hierdie navorsing lewer
’n omvattende meetinstrument vir die meting van ’n persoonlike handelsmerk, asook
empiriese bewyse rakende die verhouding tussen ’n persoonlike handelsmerk en
loopbaansukses. Die studie maak in dié opsig ‘n beduidende bydrae tot die gebrekkige
akademiese kennismateriaal wat oor hierdie onderwerp beskikbaar is. / Ulwazi nge-branding yomuntu siqu, ukuthuthukiswa kanye nokuqhubekela phambili
kwe-brand yomuntu siqu kanye nokuxhumana phakathi kwe-brand yomuntu siqu
kanye nokuphumelela emsebenzini bekuyizinto ebezingahlelekile ngendlela
yesisayense. Inhloso yalolu cwaningo bekuwukuqondisisa ukuthi ngabe iyini
imikhakha ye-branding yomuntu siqu kanye nokuthi yini okudingekayo ukwenza ibrand
yomuntu siqu emkhakheni wezamabhizinisi. Bekubalulekile nokubheka ukuthi
ngabe i-branding yomuntu siqu isemqoka kangakanani ekuphumeleleni emisebenzini.
Inqubo yokubuyekeza imibhalo ngendlela ehlelekile iye yasetshenziswa ukuphawula,
ukuhlaziya kanye nokuhlola izifundo ezinobufakazi ezenziwe kanye nemibhalo
edumile maqondana ne-branding yomuntu siqu. Imikhakha yolwazi ekhona
ibingachazekile kahle, kanti kuye kwalandelwa imodeli yezinyathalo eziyisithupha
echaza imininingwane ngokwenza kanye nokugcina i-brand yomuntu siqu, iye
yenziwa ngakho-ke kwase kuhlaziywa ingqikithi yemibhalo edumile ekhona.
Kwenziwe i-brand yomuntu siqu ephelele emkhakheni wezemisebenzi. Kulolu
cwaningo, kuhlolwe i-hypotheses yobudlelwane phakathi kwe-branding yomuntu siqu
kanye nokuphumelela emsebenzini (amaphuzu ohlolo lokusebenza ngendlela
efanele, uhlolo lobuholi obungu 360, kanye nokubekwa kwebhodi yamathalente
endaweni efanele) kuye kwahlolwa. Kutholakale ukuthi ukubekwa kwebhodi
yamathalente endaweni efanele yinto esemqoka ngokwamastatistiki kanti futhi
kuhambisana ne-branding yomuntu siqu. Ucwaningo belungolokuqala ukuhlinzeka
ngethuluzi lokukala kanye nocwaningo obunobufakazi obubambekayo ngobudlelwane
phakathi kwe-branding yomuntu siqu kanye nokuphumelela emsebenzini, kanti-ke,
lokhu yikho okuye kwaba nomthelela obabalukile kulwazi. Lolu cwaningo luvule
imikhakha lapho okungenziwa khona ezinye izinhlobo nemikhakha yocwaningo. / Business Management / DBL
|
Page generated in 0.0285 seconds