Spelling suggestions: "subject:"luxury taxa""
1 |
Compensating Against Turnover: Managers' Talent Retention Decisions in Major League Baseball Under a Budget ConstraintKnoesen, Emma 01 January 2017 (has links)
From 1997 to 1999 and 2003 to the present, Major League Baseball has had a luxury tax on high payroll teams. This paper analyzes the impact of the tax as a budget constraint on teams’ ability to reward and retain high performing players. In contrast to other papers, we use wins above replacement (WAR), a popular sabermetrics statistic, to measure performance. Using this metric, we quantify the number of top performers, how this performance is rewarded with salary, and how salary impacts players’ mobility decisions. We conclude that when using WAR, the distribution of performance is not heavy tailed and rather follows an exponential distribution. Our results suggest that there are fewer top performers in periods with a luxury tax/budget constraint. We use efficiency wage theory to understand this decrease in top performers as the result of a decrease in motivators. We understand two different mechanisms of motivating performance: (1) under a stochastic budget constraint, managers did not choose to extend the contracts of top players; and (2) under a fixed budget constraint, managers decreased the monetary reward for an increase in performance. Both these mechanisms decrease the motivation for top talent to perform highly.
|
2 |
主要國家課徵不動產奢侈稅制度比較之研究 / A study on real estate luxury tax system levied in major countries.童佩慧, Tung, Pei Hui Unknown Date (has links)
2010年台灣經濟成長率創新高,然貧富差距卻是台灣面臨最大問題之一,為避免大眾不良觀感,行政院乃針對高價服務、商品或交易,研議特種銷售稅,即通稱之「奢侈稅」,並於2011年通過與施行「特種貨物及勞務稅條例」。各國採行特種銷售稅種類繁多,課徵目的、稅率各有不同。究竟我國課徵奢侈稅制度與他國制度有何不同? 課徵奢侈稅效果為何?此為本研究主要動機。
本研究針對上述問題,採文獻分析與深度訪談法,進行深入的分析與探討。經實證分析發現:(1)主要國家課徵奢侈稅,課徵項目與目的各異。(2)解決不動產飆漲問題,多管齊下多重效果。(3)透過交易稅抑制投機,短空長多。(4)國際間相互依存,政府政策相互影響。(5)資訊透明化是決定市場機制能否發揮功效之關鍵之一。(6)不動產市場存在三種價格,阻礙不動產市場發展,更違反社會正義。(7)我國房價高漲主因財產稅稅負偏低。 / Although economic growth in Taiwan hit an all-time high in 2010, the gap between the rich and the poor has become one of Taiwan’s most serious issues. The Executive Yuan, in an effort to avoid negative public perceptions, held deliberations on a special sales tax for high-priced services, goods and trade, also commonly known as a “luxury tax”. The “Specifically Selected Goods and Services Tax Act” was sent to the Legislative Yuan for review 2011. Countries around the world have implemented many kinds of special sales tax. Such taxes differ in regard to their intended purpose and imposed rate. Exactly how does Taiwan’s imposed luxury tax differ from those of other countries? What has been the result of imposing the luxury tax in Taiwan? Finding out the answers to these two questions is the primary objective of this paper.
This study conducted literature analysis and in-depth analys. Through the empirical analysis we found that: (1) The items and reasons for taxing should be considered separately. (2) In addressing the issue of soaring real estate prices, multi-pronged approaches bring multiple results. (3) Transaction taxes to control speculation result in short-term pain, but long-term gain. (4) Because of the interdependent nature of nations, the government policies of a given nation influence other nations. (5) information transparency is a key factor in deciding whether or not market mechanisms can be effectively leveraged. (6) the existence of three different prices in the real estate market is a barrier to the development of the market and, more importantly, violates the principles of social justice. (7) the main reason behind the rocketing price of housing in Taiwan is the low property tax burden.
|
Page generated in 0.0612 seconds