Medicaid provides coverage to approximately 60 million individuals and is the largest single payer of healthcare for children. Given this scope of the program and the concentration of low-income and minority recipients, improvements to the quality of care delivered to Medicaid members represents a significant opportunity to reduce health care disparities and improve the overall delivery and quality of healthcare within the U.S. The current study sought to evaluate the various approaches that state Medicaid agencies are taking to assess and improve the quality of care to their managed care enrollees and the degree to which they have implemented recommendations of various policy experts. A survey was distributed to the Medicaid Directors of all 50 states. A total of 23 states with risk based managed care programs responded, representing 62% of the states that have managed care programs. The results indicated that nearly all states are utilizing standard performance measures as one method to assess quality, with virtually all relying on HEDIS measures for this purpose. Additional strategies that are being used include public reporting of quality data and the use of pay-for-performance incentives; few states are currently focusing on health information technology. Recommendations are made for steps that the Medicaid program could take at both the state and federal level to further develop quality improvement programs.

Thesis (D.P.H.)--University of Oklahoma. / Bibliography: leaves 52-53.

Class of 2015 Abstract / Objectives: Characterize all patients in the emergency room diagnosed with anxiety disorders from 11/01/2013 until 5/31/2014 to identify insurance coverage and demographic trends. Methods: Retrospective descriptive study of patients who present to the emergency department between 11/01/2013 – 05/31/2014 and discharged with a primary documented diagnosis of an anxiety disorder. Age, race, and gender were recorded in addition to insurance coverage. Results: 406 visits were reviewed: 212 (52.2%) males and 194 (47.8%) females. Average age per visit: 40.34 (SD=13.388). Race recorded with each visit: 189 (46.6%) white, 146 (36.0%) Hispanic, 42 (10.3%) African American, and 29 (2.2%) other. The most common insurance coverage was Medicaid at 63.3%, while 6.4% of visits had no insurance coverage. There was a significant difference in the distribution in number of ED visits between genders (Mann-Whitney U=17,407.5, p=0.007, sig ≥0.05). A Kruskal-Wallis Test showed a significant difference in the number of ED visits between racial groups X²=43.434, p=0.000 as well as a significant difference between Medicaid and other insurance groups X²=37.778, p=0.021. Conclusions: Men appear to have a higher frequency in anxiety symptoms requiring an ED visit than women do. White patients tend to have a greater frequency in anxiety symptoms followed by Hispanic patients. Medicaid tends to be the most prevalent insurance coverage used.

The complexity of issues in health care in the United States--specifically insurance coverage, access, affordability, quality of care, and financing--requires effective new models for governing, in which governmental and non-governmental organizations seek to solve problems collaboratively rather than independently. This research explores collaborative governance as a model to form new partnerships among for-profit, nonprofit, and public organizations in an effort to create community-based, locally governed health care entities in Oregon through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). A key question is whether collaboration, through CCOs, brings together government and non-governmental organizations to solve "intractable problems" by establishing new public-private partnerships in Medicaid. The research focuses on the formation of CCOs, including the influence of local, political, institutional, and historical contexts, planning processes, and governance structures. The hypothesis is that conditions, norms, governance structures and processes, and the presence or absence of a combination of these factors, facilitate or impede participation and decision-making, and over time, successful system integration by these new complex organizations. This study developed insights into similarities and differences among CCO governance structures by investigating three CCOs. Findings from the case study suggest that the following key factors influence the collaborative governance process among government and non-governmental organizations within CCOs: prior history of conflict or cooperation; open, transparent, and inclusive processes for stakeholders; face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and shared understanding; and high-functioning governing boards. Results also indicate that maintaining stakeholder participation can be challenging due to time and cost, power imbalances and competing interests among stakeholders, and mistrust and lack of facilitative leadership. The results suggest that collaborative governance is a strategic approach for the allocation of limited resources across public, private, and nonprofit organizations to deliver services to Oregon's Medicaid population. The significance of this study is that it identified starting conditions that facilitate and hinder the ability of CCOs to effectively solve problems through governance mechanisms. Oregon's CCOs offer an example of multiple layers of governing institutions--federal, state, and county--using formal authority to influence a specified set of outcomes, the Triple Aim, in a specific policy domain: provision of health care services for underserved Oregonians. Results of the study can help inform a larger, more fundamental question in public administration about contemporary governance: whether government through collaborative governance can create the "conditions for rule and collective action" through public-private partnerships to achieve policy goals (Stoker, 1998). Further research is needed to better understand whether local community-based organizations such as CCOs offer a sustainable model to address policy issues in other arenas by which there is "more government action and less government involvement" (Agranoff & McGuire, 2003). This study contributes to the theory of collaborative governance and may inform future policy decisions about CCOs in Oregon and, more broadly, ongoing national health care reform efforts.

Multiyear trends showing high rates of alcohol and opioid-related misuse as well as opioid-related deaths have renewed attention on both access to and the quality of substance use treatment. In response, diverse healthcare systems that care for the Medicaid population have begun implementing large-scale transformations including new services and provider training requirements. The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services has urged state Medicaid programs to use Sections 1115 waiver demonstrations as vehicles for substance use treatment delivery system transformation. For many states, undertaking the Section 1115 waiver demonstration means moving from very limited benefits to a full continuum of new services. States’ ability to achieve such transformations is unknown since demonstration processes are under-reported and considered implementation “black boxes”. Substance use treatment delivery changes are also occurring at the community level, where several hospitals systems have implemented new services to meet the needs of their patient population. However, the influence of these new care models on patient service utilization is unknown. In this dissertation, I use comparative case study design and qualitative content analysis to examine the pre-implementation decision-making processes that Medicaid policymakers in California, Virginia and West Virginia experienced when deciding to enhance their substance use treatment service delivery systems using Sections 1115 waivers. I qualitatively describe how broad sociocultural and local organizational factors influenced Medicaid agencies’ ability to expand access to treatment. I also present a taxonomy of implementation strategies used to translate Medicaid policy into clinical services available in the community. Finally, I present a latent transition analysis to reveal how the nature of substance use treatment services available to patients may influence their service utilization over time. This final quantitative analysis is set within the context of a safety net hospital that provides a comprehensive, low barrier access model for substance use treatment, and primarily serves Medicaid beneficiaries. Results of this dissertation illuminate processes and outcomes associated with pre-, mid-, and post-implementation activities targeting improvements in the delivery of substance use treatment services. / 2023-01-19T00:00:00Z

Previous studies suggest that Medicaid-enrolled children have difficulties accessing dental care, which can lead to untreated dental disease, poor oral health, and compromised overall health status. While Medicaid-enrolled children with a chronic condition (CC) encounter additional barriers to dental care, most relevant studies on dental utilization fail to adopt risk adjustment methods. As such, the impact of CC status and CC severity on access to dental care for Medicaid-enrolled children is poorly understood. The main objectives of this dissertation were to: 1) compare dental utilization for Medicaid-enrolled children with and without a CC; 2) assess the relationship between CC severity and dental utilization; and 3) identify the other factors associated with dental utilization. The 3M Clinical Risk Grouping (CRG) Methods were applied to enrollee-level data from the Iowa Medicaid Program (2003-2008) to identify children with and without a CC and to classify children with a CC into a CC severity level. Three outcome measures were developed: 1) access to an annual dental visit; 2) use of dental services under general anesthesia (GA); and 3) time to the first dental visit after initial enrollment into the Medicaid program. We used multiple variable logistic regression models and survival analytic techniques to test our study hypotheses. Compared to Medicaid-enrolled children without a CC, those with a CC were more likely to have had an annual dental visit and earlier first dental visits. Having a CC was an important determinant of dental utilization under GA for older but not for younger Medicaid-enrolled children. In terms of CC severity, Medicaid-enrolled children with more severe CCs were less likely to have had an annual dental visit and more likely to have utilized dental services under GA. CC severity was not associated with the rate at which the first dental visit took place. Not residing in a dental Health Professional Shortage Area, previous use of dental care, and previous utilization of primary medical care were all positively associated with dental utilization. Identifying and understanding the determinants of access to dental care is an important first step in developing clinical interventions and policies aimed at improving access to dental care for all Medicaid-enrolled children. Future work should focus on identifying the socio-behavioral determinants of as well as the clinical outcomes associated with access to dental services for vulnerable children.

Preterm birth is a key indicator of maternal and child health, affecting 1 in 10 deliveries in the United States (US) and contributing to long-term morbidity and healthcare costs. The COVID-19 pandemic and policies to mitigate the spread of infection may have indirectly impacted preterm birth, but the results of early epidemiological studies were mixed and declines were largely concentrated in high-income countries and populations. Moreover, while most studies focused on stress-related pathways associated with lockdown policies, healthcare disruptions may have also played a role. The goal of this dissertation was to investigate changes in preterm birth and healthcare disruptions related to the COVID-19 lockdown in a low-income population in the US. In the first aim, I conducted a systematic review of the literature on the pandemic and preterm birth, with a focus on studies that examine heterogeneity by income. In the second aim, New York State (NYS) Medicaid claims were used to examine changes in preterm birth rates during the state’s lockdown policy (NYS on PAUSE) using difference-in-difference methods. In the third aim, changes in preterm were further stratified into those that were spontaneous or medically induced, which may reflect a healthcare pathway. Weekly rates of healthcare utilization, antenatal surveillance, and maternal complications were also assessed using interrupted time series models to characterize healthcare disruptions over the course of the lockdown and across the state. Results from the systematic review documented the rapid growth in research on this topic since the beginning of pandemic. Among the 67 articles included, most reported some decline in preterm birth rates; however, there was large variation by country, methods of exposure assessment, and onset of delivery. Only seven studies focused on differences by individual income (or income proxies) and those that did were inconsistent. Results from Aim 2 suggested that NYS on PAUSE was associated with nearly a percentage point decline in preterm birth rates in the Medicaid-insured population, without a concomitant increase in stillbirth. Aim 3 demonstrated that the change in preterm was largely driven by declines in medically induced preterm. Interrupted time series models showed substantial, but time-limited, declines in pregnancy-related healthcare utilization at the beginning of NYS on PAUSE. Overall, the findings in this dissertation suggest there were modest declines in preterm birth during the COVID-19 lockdown among low-income women in NYS, particularly in medically induced preterm. Healthcare disruptions were common for Medicaid-insured women and may partially explain the reduction in preterm birth in this population. Future research is needed to determine whether this change was positive for some and negative for others, and what that might mean for efforts to improve pregnancy outcomes in the future.

Background: Rates of physical disability are higher in women than in men, and economically disadvantaged women are at greater risk for physical disability than women with higher incomes. Chronic diseases increase the risk of physical disability, and people with physical disability experience some added risks of secondary conditions including chronic disease. Yet, little is known about the prevalence of chronic disease among women living with a physical disability who use Medicaid, a particularly disadvantaged population. Objective: This study described the prevalence of chronic disease among adult (18-64 years), female, Florida Medicaid beneficiaries living with a physical disability between 2001 and 2005. Methods: Using Medicaid eligibility and claims files, we extracted ICD-9 codes for physically-disabling conditions and Current Procedure Terminology codes for mobility-assistive devices to define three levels of physical disability. Results: Participants appeared to be at high risk for both physical disability and chronic diseases. Close to half of the women had been diagnosed with one or more physically-disabling conditions, and 5.3% used mobility devices. One-third of the women had hypertension and sizeable proportions had other chronic diseases. Women with physical disability were more likely to have co-morbid chronic diseases than their able-bodied counterparts. Discussion: Our findings support the need for improved chronic disease prevention among female Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly those with physical disability. Strategies to improve prevention, screening and treatment in this population may mitigate the trends toward higher physical disability rates in the low-income, working-age population and may prevent high Medicare and Medicaid costs in the long-run.

Introduction: The US Health Care and Social Services sector (North American Industrial Classification System 'sector 62') has become an extremely important component of the nation's economy, employing approximately 18 million workers and generating almost $753 billion in annual payrolls. At the county level, the health care and social services sector is typically the largest or second largest employer. Hospital employment is often the largest component of the sector's total employment. Hospital employment is particularly important to non-metropolitan or rural communities. A high quality healthcare sector serves to promote economic development and attract new businesses and to provide stability in economic downturns. The purpose of this study was to examine the intensity of hospital employment in rural counties relative to the nation as a whole using location quotients and to draw conclusions regarding how potential changes in Medicare and Medicaid might affect rural populations. Methods: Estimates for county-level hospital employment are not commonly available. Estimates of county-level hospital employment were therefore generated for all counties in the USA the Census Bureau's County Business Pattern Data for 2010. These estimates were used to generate location quotients for each county which were combined with demographic data to generate a profile of factors that are related to the magnitude of location quotients. The results were then used to draw inferences regarding the possible impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010 (ACA) and the possible imposition of aspects of the Budget Control Act 2011 (BCA). Results: Although a very high percentage of rural counties contain medically underserved areas, an examination of location quotients indicates that the percentage of the county workforce employed by hospitals in the most rural counties tends to be higher than for the nation as a whole, a counterintuitive finding. Further, when location quotients are regressed upon data related to poverty, county demographics, and the percentage of the population insured, a relationship between the proportion of the population over 65 years, the percentage of the population living in poverty, the percentage of the population without insurance and county density was found. Conclusion: The results of the analysis suggest that hospital employment in rural communities is higher than would be expected in the absence of programs that provide external funding to support hospital hiring. The most important public programs providing this support are Medicare and Medicaid. Social Security is another source of federal funding important for rural populations. Sequestration and other cuts in funding could impact rural communities significantly. This can be even worse in states that fail to expand Medicaid and in states that fail to increase Medicaid reimbursements for services important in rural communities.

Background: Rates of physical disability are higher in women than in men, and economically disadvantaged women are at greater risk for physical disability than women with higher incomes. Chronic diseases increase the risk of physical disability, and people with physical disability experience some added risks of secondary conditions including chronic disease. Yet, little is known about the prevalence of chronic disease among women living with a physical disability who use Medicaid, a particularly disadvantaged population. Objective: This study described the prevalence of chronic disease among adult (18-64 years), female, Florida Medicaid beneficiaries living with a physical disability between 2001 and 2005. Methods: Using Medicaid eligibility and claims files, we extracted ICD-9 codes for physically-disabling conditions and Current Procedure Terminology codes for mobility-assistive devices to define three levels of physical disability. Results: Participants appeared to be at high risk for both physical disability and chronic diseases. Close to half of the women had been diagnosed with one or more physically-disabling conditions, and 5.3% used mobility devices. One-third of the women had hypertension and sizeable proportions had other chronic diseases. Women with physical disability were more likely to have co-morbid chronic diseases than their able-bodied counterparts. Discussion: Our findings support the need for improved chronic disease prevention among female Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly those with physical disability. Strategies to improve prevention, screening and treatment in this population may mitigate the trends toward higher physical disability rates in the low-income, working-age population and may prevent high Medicare and Medicaid costs in the long-run.