Lack of patient adherence with medication results in health care costs and adverse clinical outcomes. Although fear of side effects can contribute to non-adherence, being informed about them can actually improve matters. Nonetheless, questions persist as to the most efficient way to convey that type of information to patients for a given medication. Information on side effects is largely limited to a simple list in medication leaflets, often without frequency data (that is, lacking detail as to how often they might occur). The decision-making literature suggests that the interpretation of information varies depending on the presentation format or the frame used. This study examined the impact of providing numerical information for side effect frequency, levels of illness severity, and side effect framing on the likelihood of taking an OTC medicine.<p> Participants received a headache scenario with three drug options (X, Y and Z) to consider for use. These painkillers had three levels of potency (defined as 50, 75, and 100% effective) and were accompanied with three levels of side effects (two, four, and six items). When considering their drug choice for the headaches, participants received drug information written without side effect frequency data, then again with side effect frequency data. Subjects rated their likelihood of taking Drug X, Y and Z on a scale of 1 (very unlikely) to 100 (very likely). Participants were also asked to show their likelihood of taking a different set of two medications for headaches (coined Drug N and P) based on positively-slanted or negatively-slanted wording in relation to chances of experiencing a side effect (heartburn).<p> Thirty subjects from Saskatoon over 50 years of age participated. The average age was 66.6 years and 63.3 percent of participants were female. Less than half of participants (n=11) had previous experience with side effects. Most participants were using at least one medicine (whether OTC or prescribed) and described themselves as knowledgeable or somewhat knowledgeable.<p> Participants were more likely to take the hypothetical drugs in the situations described when they received frequency data for side effects (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant higher mean likelihood of use when the drug was framed positively (p<0.01).<p> When considering decisions involving drug effectiveness and their side effects, the provision of frequency data increased patient likelihood of use. Framing the context in positive format also increased patient likelihood to use a medicine. This information could be important for pharmacists counseling on medication side effects, especially for those patients with medication adherence problems.

Lack of patient adherence with medication results in health care costs and adverse clinical outcomes. Although fear of side effects can contribute to non-adherence, being informed about them can actually improve matters. Nonetheless, questions persist as to the most efficient way to convey that type of information to patients for a given medication. Information on side effects is largely limited to a simple list in medication leaflets, often without frequency data (that is, lacking detail as to how often they might occur). The decision-making literature suggests that the interpretation of information varies depending on the presentation format or the frame used. This study examined the impact of providing numerical information for side effect frequency, levels of illness severity, and side effect framing on the likelihood of taking an OTC medicine.<p> Participants received a headache scenario with three drug options (X, Y and Z) to consider for use. These painkillers had three levels of potency (defined as 50, 75, and 100% effective) and were accompanied with three levels of side effects (two, four, and six items). When considering their drug choice for the headaches, participants received drug information written without side effect frequency data, then again with side effect frequency data. Subjects rated their likelihood of taking Drug X, Y and Z on a scale of 1 (very unlikely) to 100 (very likely). Participants were also asked to show their likelihood of taking a different set of two medications for headaches (coined Drug N and P) based on positively-slanted or negatively-slanted wording in relation to chances of experiencing a side effect (heartburn).<p> Thirty subjects from Saskatoon over 50 years of age participated. The average age was 66.6 years and 63.3 percent of participants were female. Less than half of participants (n=11) had previous experience with side effects. Most participants were using at least one medicine (whether OTC or prescribed) and described themselves as knowledgeable or somewhat knowledgeable.<p> Participants were more likely to take the hypothetical drugs in the situations described when they received frequency data for side effects (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant higher mean likelihood of use when the drug was framed positively (p<0.01).<p> When considering decisions involving drug effectiveness and their side effects, the provision of frequency data increased patient likelihood of use. Framing the context in positive format also increased patient likelihood to use a medicine. This information could be important for pharmacists counseling on medication side effects, especially for those patients with medication adherence problems.

Children of Hispanic origin have the highest prevalence of asthma of all ethnic groups in the United States, especially Puerto Rican children, who have a prevalence of 12.9%. Treatment nonadherence has been identified as one contributing factor. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the reasons for nonadherence to the asthma treatment regimen among Puerto Rican children. Parents and health care providers of asthmatic children were interviewed regarding their beliefs about asthma as a disease, its effect on the child's life, and their experience with asthma treatment. Two models served as the theoretical framework: the health belief model and the Institute of Medicine model framework for asthma disparities. Interview data were collected from 8 parents using a questionnaire, and a focus group was conducted with 3 health care professionals. Data were manually coded to identify emerging themes. Even though parents reported fear of asthma medications and medication side effects, none of the parents stopped the asthma treatment. Results also indicated that lack of education about asthma, asthma treatment, and asthma action plan was evident in 75% of the parents. None of the parents who migrated to the United States from Puerto Rico received education about asthma while living in Puerto Rico. Health care professionals reported that although parents are familiar with asthma, they do not understand that it is a chronic disease that requires daily treatment. Findings may be used to create an asthma education plan tailored to the needs of the Hispanic population.