Evidence-based practice (EBP) in mental health was initiated in the United States due to state legislation. The EBP implementation process is complex due to multiple factors related to organizational culture. Mental health agencies implementing EBP processes can expect significant personnel changes due to higher turnover rates, which may have a negative effect on the quality of services. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between providers' attitudes toward the adoption of EBPs and organizational culture. The theoretical framework for this study was organizational culture theory and the Denison organizational culture model. This correlational and predictive study examined the relationship between the domains behind 112 provider attitudes as measured by the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale and the multiple traits of organizational culture as measured by the Denison Organizational Culture Survey. A Pearson correlation was conducted in order to determine whether there were significant relationships prior to conducing a standard multiple regression and a stepwise multiple regression analysis. This study found a significant relationship between the mission trait and general provider attitudes and between the involvement trait and organizational support. The stepwise regression analysis found the mission trait to be a predictor of general provider attitudes. The standard regression analysis found the involvement trait to be a predictor of organizational support. Having this new insight could help managers make adjustments that may help providers be receptive to EBP adoption and ultimately may help in decreasing an organization's turnover. A more stable work environment may be conducive to the provision of higher quality services, leading to social change.

Denna essä har som syfte att undersöka hur diagnosen klimatångest hos unga har dimensioner som kan vara svåra att möta i en klassisk vårdmiljö. Det finns frågor av etisk och existentiell natur som behöver bemötas och besvaras. Det är inte bara hos klienten som dessa uppstår utan även hos den behandlande terapeuten. Denna essä är ett försök att rikta ljuset mot några av de aspekter som en behandlande terapeut eller annan personal kan behöva ta hänsyn till i sitt praktiska handlande till vardags.   Den belyser frågor som neutralitet, objektivitet, autenticitet och medkänsla. Den andra delen av essän behandlar frågan om professionellt och personligt ansvar och resonerar kring frågor om skuld, kollektiv ansvar, utvidgat ansvar och om terapirummets offentlighet och avskildhet. / The purpose of this essay is to examine how the diagnosis of climate anxiety in young people has dimensions that can be difficult to meet in the classic healthcare environment. There are questions of an ethical and existential nature that need to be addressed and answered. This essay is an attempt to shed light on some of the aspects that a clinical therapist or other clinical professions may need to take into account in their everyday practical actions. It highlights issues such as neutrality, objectivity, authenticity and compassion. The second part of the essay deals with the question of professional and personal responsibility and reasons around issues of guilt, collective responsibility, extended responsibility and about the publicness and privacy of the therapy room.