Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder. The degeneration of the neurons of the substantia nigra in the midbrain leads to the loss of dopamine from the striatum, which is responsible for the motor symptoms of PD. In the brain, the enzyme, monoamine oxidase B (MAOB), An analysis of the Lineweaver-Burk plots indicated that 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinone inhibits MAO-B with a Ki value of 2.7 nM. An analysis of the structure-activity relationships for MAO-B inhibition shows that substitution on the C7 position of the 3,4-dihydro- 2(1H)-quinolinone moiety leads to significantly more potent inhibition compared to substitution on C6. In this regard, a benzyloxy substituent on C7 is more favourable than phenylethoxy and phenylpropoxy substitution on this position. In spite of this, C6-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone with potent MAO-B inhibitory activities were also identified. An analyses of selected properties of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinones showed that the compounds are highly lipophilic with logP values in the range of 3.03- 4.55. LogP values between 1 and 3 are, however, in the ideal range for bioavailability. The compounds synthesised have logP values higher than 3, which may lead to lower bioavailability. Laboratory data further showed that none of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are highly toxic to cultured cells at the concentrations, 1 μM and 10 μM, tested. For example, the most potent MAO-B inhibitor, 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, reduced cell viability to 88.11% and 86.10% at concentrations of 1 μM and 10 μM, respectively. These concentrations are well above its IC50 value for the inhibition of MAO-B. At concentrations required for MAO-B inhibition, the more potent 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are thus unlikely to be cytotoxic. It may thus be concluded that C7-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are promising highly potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors, and thus leads for the therapy of Parkinson’s disease. represents a major catabolic pathway of dopamine. Inhibitors of MAO-B conserve the depleted supply of dopamine and are thus used in the therapy of PD. In the present study, a series of 3,4- dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B. These quinolinone derivatives are structurally related to a series of coumarin (1-benzopyran-2-one) derivatives, which has been reported to act as MAO-B inhibitors. C6- and C7-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives were synthesized by reacting 6- or 7- hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone with an appropriately substituted alkyl bromide in the presence of base. To evaluate the MAO inhibitory properties (IC50 values) of the quinolinone derivatives the recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B enzymes were used. The reversibility of inhibition of a representative 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivative was examined by measuring the recovery of enzyme activity after the dilution of the enzyme-inhibitor complexes, while the mode of MAO inhibition was determined by constructing Lineweaver-Burk plots. To determine the lipophilicity of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives, the logP values were measured. The toxicity of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives towards cultured cells (cytotoxicity) was also measured. The results document that the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives are highly potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors with most homologues exhibiting IC50 values in the nanomolar range. The most potent MAO-B inhibitor, 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, exhibits an IC50 value of 2.9 nM with a 2750-fold selectivity for MAO-B over the MAO-A isoform. As a MAO-B inhibitor, this compound is approximately equipotent to the most potent coumarin derivative (IC50 = 1.14 nM) reported in literature. Since MAO-B activity could be recovered after dilution of enzyme-inhibitor mixtures, it may be concluded that 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinone is a reversible MAO-B inhibitor. The Lineweaver-Burk plots constructed for the inhibition of MAO-B by 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone were linear and intersected on the y-axis. These data indicated that this compound also is a competitive MAO-B inhibitor. / MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder. The degeneration of the neurons of the substantia nigra in the midbrain leads to the loss of dopamine from the striatum, which is responsible for the motor symptoms of PD. In the brain, the enzyme, monoamine oxidase B (MAOB), An analysis of the Lineweaver-Burk plots indicated that 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinone inhibits MAO-B with a Ki value of 2.7 nM. An analysis of the structure-activity relationships for MAO-B inhibition shows that substitution on the C7 position of the 3,4-dihydro- 2(1H)-quinolinone moiety leads to significantly more potent inhibition compared to substitution on C6. In this regard, a benzyloxy substituent on C7 is more favourable than phenylethoxy and phenylpropoxy substitution on this position. In spite of this, C6-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone with potent MAO-B inhibitory activities were also identified. An analyses of selected properties of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinones showed that the compounds are highly lipophilic with logP values in the range of 3.03- 4.55. LogP values between 1 and 3 are, however, in the ideal range for bioavailability. The compounds synthesised have logP values higher than 3, which may lead to lower bioavailability. Laboratory data further showed that none of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are highly toxic to cultured cells at the concentrations, 1 μM and 10 μM, tested. For example, the most potent MAO-B inhibitor, 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, reduced cell viability to 88.11% and 86.10% at concentrations of 1 μM and 10 μM, respectively. These concentrations are well above its IC50 value for the inhibition of MAO-B. At concentrations required for MAO-B inhibition, the more potent 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are thus unlikely to be cytotoxic. It may thus be concluded that C7-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinones are promising highly potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors, and thus leads for the therapy of Parkinson’s disease. represents a major catabolic pathway of dopamine. Inhibitors of MAO-B conserve the depleted supply of dopamine and are thus used in the therapy of PD. In the present study, a series of 3,4- dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B. These quinolinone derivatives are structurally related to a series of coumarin (1-benzopyran-2-one) derivatives, which has been reported to act as MAO-B inhibitors. C6- and C7-substituted 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives were synthesized by reacting 6- or 7- hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone with an appropriately substituted alkyl bromide in the presence of base. To evaluate the MAO inhibitory properties (IC50 values) of the quinolinone derivatives the recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B enzymes were used. The reversibility of inhibition of a representative 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivative was examined by measuring the recovery of enzyme activity after the dilution of the enzyme-inhibitor complexes, while the mode of MAO inhibition was determined by constructing Lineweaver-Burk plots. To determine the lipophilicity of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives, the logP values were measured. The toxicity of the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives towards cultured cells (cytotoxicity) was also measured. The results document that the 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives are highly potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors with most homologues exhibiting IC50 values in the nanomolar range. The most potent MAO-B inhibitor, 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, exhibits an IC50 value of 2.9 nM with a 2750-fold selectivity for MAO-B over the MAO-A isoform. As a MAO-B inhibitor, this compound is approximately equipotent to the most potent coumarin derivative (IC50 = 1.14 nM) reported in literature. Since MAO-B activity could be recovered after dilution of enzyme-inhibitor mixtures, it may be concluded that 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)- quinolinone is a reversible MAO-B inhibitor. The Lineweaver-Burk plots constructed for the inhibition of MAO-B by 7-(3-bromobenzyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone were linear and intersected on the y-axis. These data indicated that this compound also is a competitive MAO-B inhibitor. / MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized pathologically by a marked loss of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons and clinically by disabling movement disorders. PD can be treated by inhibiting monoamine oxidase (MAO), specifically MAO–B, since this is a major enzyme involved in the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO–B may conserve the dopamine supply in the brain and may therefore provide symptomatic relief for PD patients. Selegiline is an irreversible MAO–B inhibitor and is currently used for the treatment of PD. Irreversible inhibitors inactivate enzymes by forming stable covalent complexes. The process is not readily reversed either by removing the remainder of the free inhibitor or by increasing the substrate concentration. Even dilution or dialysis does not dissociate the enzyme inhibitor complex and restore enzyme activity. From a safety point of view it may therefore be more desirable to develop reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. In this study, caffeine was used as lead compound to design, synthesize and evaluate new reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. This study is based on the finding that C–8 substituted caffeine analogues are potent MAO inhibitors. For example, (E)–8–(3–chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is an exceptionally potent competitive inhibitor of MAO–B with an enzyme–inhibitor dissociation constant (Ki value) of 128 nM. In this study caffeine was similarly conjugated at C–8 to various side–chains. The effect that these chosen side–chains had on the MAO–B inhibition activity of C–8 substituted caffeine analogues will then be evaluated. The caffeine analogues were also evaluated as human MAO–A inhibitors. For the purpose of this study, saturated C–8 side chains were selected with the goal of discovering new C–8 side chains that enhance the MAO–A and ?B inhibition potency of caffeine. As mentioned above, the styryl side chain is one example of a side chain that enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. Should a side chain with promising MAO inhibition activity be identified in this study, the inhibition potency will be further optimized in a future study by the addition of a variety of substituents to the C–8 side chain ring. For example, halogen substitution of (E)–8– styrylcaffeine enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency by up to 10 fold. The saturated side chains selected for the present study included the phenylethyl (1), phenylpropyl (2), phenylbutyl (3) and phenylpentyl (4) functional groups. Also included are the cyclohexylethyl (8), 3–oxo–3– phenylpropyl (5), 4–oxo–4–phenylbutyl (6) moieties. A test compound containing an unsaturated linker between C–8 of caffeine and the side chain ring, the phenylpropenyl analogue 7, was also included. This study is therefore an exploratory study to discover new C–8 moieties that are favorable for MAO– inhibition. All the target compounds were synthesized by reacting 1,3–dimethyl–5,6–diaminouracil with an appropriate carboxylic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide dehydrating agent. Following ring closure and methylation at C–7, the target inhibitors were obtained. Inhibition potencies were determined using recombinant human MAO–A and MAO–B as enzyme sources. The inhibitor potencies were expressed as IC50 values. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor was 8–(5– phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) with an IC50 value of 0.656 ?M. In contrast, all the other test inhibitors were moderately potent MAO–B inhibitors. In fact the next best MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(4– phenylbutyl)caffeine (3) was approximately 5 fold less potent than 4 with an IC50 value of 3.25 ?M. Since the 5–phenylpentyl moiety is the longest side chain evaluated in this study, this finding demonstrates that longer C–8 side chains are more favorable for MAO–B inhibition. Interestingly, compound 5 containing a cyclohexylethyl side chain (IC50 = 6.59 ?M) was approximately 4 fold more potent than the analogue containing the phenylethyl linker (1) (IC50 = 26.0 ?M). This suggests that a cyclohexyl ring in the C–8 side chain of caffeine may be more optimal for MAO–B inhibition and should be considered in future studies. The caffeine analogues containing the oxophenylalkyl side chains (5 and 6) were weak MAO–B inhibitors with IC50 values of 187 ?M and 46.9 ?M, respectively. This suggests that the presence of a carbonyl group in the C–8 side chain is not favorable for the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. The unsaturated phenylpropenyl analogue 7 was also found to be a relatively weak MAO–B inhibitor with an IC50 value of 33.1 ?M. In contrast to the results obtained with MAO–B, the test caffeine analogues were all weak MAOA inhibitors. With the exception of compound 5, all of the analogues evaluated were selective inhibitors of MAO–B. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(5–phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) was the most selective inhibitor, 48 fold more potent towards MAO–B than MAO–A. This study also shows that two selected analogues (5 and 3) bind reversibly to MAO–A and ?B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO–A and –B inhibition is competitive for these representative compounds. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized pathologically by a marked loss of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons and clinically by disabling movement disorders. PD can be treated by inhibiting monoamine oxidase (MAO), specifically MAO–B, since this is a major enzyme involved in the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO–B may conserve the dopamine supply in the brain and may therefore provide symptomatic relief for PD patients. Selegiline is an irreversible MAO–B inhibitor and is currently used for the treatment of PD. Irreversible inhibitors inactivate enzymes by forming stable covalent complexes. The process is not readily reversed either by removing the remainder of the free inhibitor or by increasing the substrate concentration. Even dilution or dialysis does not dissociate the enzyme inhibitor complex and restore enzyme activity. From a safety point of view it may therefore be more desirable to develop reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. In this study, caffeine was used as lead compound to design, synthesize and evaluate new reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. This study is based on the finding that C–8 substituted caffeine analogues are potent MAO inhibitors. For example, (E)–8–(3–chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is an exceptionally potent competitive inhibitor of MAO–B with an enzyme–inhibitor dissociation constant (Ki value) of 128 nM. In this study caffeine was similarly conjugated at C–8 to various side–chains. The effect that these chosen side–chains had on the MAO–B inhibition activity of C–8 substituted caffeine analogues will then be evaluated. The caffeine analogues were also evaluated as human MAO–A inhibitors. For the purpose of this study, saturated C–8 side chains were selected with the goal of discovering new C–8 side chains that enhance the MAO–A and ?B inhibition potency of caffeine. As mentioned above, the styryl side chain is one example of a side chain that enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. Should a side chain with promising MAO inhibition activity be identified in this study, the inhibition potency will be further optimized in a future study by the addition of a variety of substituents to the C–8 side chain ring. For example, halogen substitution of (E)–8– styrylcaffeine enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency by up to 10 fold. The saturated side chains selected for the present study included the phenylethyl (1), phenylpropyl (2), phenylbutyl (3) and phenylpentyl (4) functional groups. Also included are the cyclohexylethyl (8), 3–oxo–3– phenylpropyl (5), 4–oxo–4–phenylbutyl (6) moieties. A test compound containing an unsaturated linker between C–8 of caffeine and the side chain ring, the phenylpropenyl analogue 7, was also included. This study is therefore an exploratory study to discover new C–8 moieties that are favorable for MAO– inhibition. All the target compounds were synthesized by reacting 1,3–dimethyl–5,6–diaminouracil with an appropriate carboxylic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide dehydrating agent. Following ring closure and methylation at C–7, the target inhibitors were obtained. Inhibition potencies were determined using recombinant human MAO–A and MAO–B as enzyme sources. The inhibitor potencies were expressed as IC50 values. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor was 8–(5– phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) with an IC50 value of 0.656 ?M. In contrast, all the other test inhibitors were moderately potent MAO–B inhibitors. In fact the next best MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(4– phenylbutyl)caffeine (3) was approximately 5 fold less potent than 4 with an IC50 value of 3.25 ?M. Since the 5–phenylpentyl moiety is the longest side chain evaluated in this study, this finding demonstrates that longer C–8 side chains are more favorable for MAO–B inhibition. Interestingly, compound 5 containing a cyclohexylethyl side chain (IC50 = 6.59 ?M) was approximately 4 fold more potent than the analogue containing the phenylethyl linker (1) (IC50 = 26.0 ?M). This suggests that a cyclohexyl ring in the C–8 side chain of caffeine may be more optimal for MAO–B inhibition and should be considered in future studies. The caffeine analogues containing the oxophenylalkyl side chains (5 and 6) were weak MAO–B inhibitors with IC50 values of 187 ?M and 46.9 ?M, respectively. This suggests that the presence of a carbonyl group in the C–8 side chain is not favorable for the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. The unsaturated phenylpropenyl analogue 7 was also found to be a relatively weak MAO–B inhibitor with an IC50 value of 33.1 ?M. In contrast to the results obtained with MAO–B, the test caffeine analogues were all weak MAOA inhibitors. With the exception of compound 5, all of the analogues evaluated were selective inhibitors of MAO–B. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(5–phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) was the most selective inhibitor, 48 fold more potent towards MAO–B than MAO–A. This study also shows that two selected analogues (5 and 3) bind reversibly to MAO–A and ?B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO–A and –B inhibition is competitive for these representative compounds. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Purpose: Monoamine oxidase (MAO) plays a key role in the treatment of Parkinson‟s disease (PD), since it is the major enzyme responsible for the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO-B may conserve dopamine in the brain and provide symptomatic relief. The MAO-B inhibitors that are currently used for the treatment of PD, are associated with a variety of adverse effects (psychotoxic and cardiovascular effects) along with additional disadvantages such as irreversible inhibition of the enzyme. Irreversible inhibition may be considered a disadvantage, since following treatment with irreversible inhibitors, the rate by which the enzyme activity is recovered may be variable and may require several weeks. In contrast, following the administration of reversible inhibitors, enzyme activity is recovered when the inhibitor is cleared from the tissues. There exists therefore, a need to develop new reversible inhibitors of MAO-B which are considered to be safer than irreversible MAO-B inhibitors. Rationale: Recently discovered reversible MAO-B inhibitors include safinamide and (E)-8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC). Safinamide has a benzyloxy side chain, which is thought to be important for inhibition of MAO-B. CSC, on the other hand, consists of a caffeine moiety with a styryl substituent at C-8, which is also a critical feature for its inhibitory activity. In a previous study, the caffeine ring and the benzyloxy side chain were combined to produce a series of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues which proved to be potent new MAO-B inhibitors. In this study, caffeine was substituted with the phenoxymethyl functional group at C-8, instead of the benzyloxy moiety. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the MAO-B inhibition potencies of selected 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues with the previously studied 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. In the current study, 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine (1) and nine 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues (2-10) were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of recombinant human MAOA and –B. These analogues only differed in substitution on C3 and C4 of the phenoxymethyl phenyl ring. The substituents that were selected were halogens (Cl, F, and Br), the methyl group, the methoxy group and the trifluoromethyl group. These substituents are similar to those selected in a previous study where 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues were evaluated as MAO inhibitors. This study therefore explores the effect that a variety of substituents on C3 and C4 of the phenoxymethyl phenyl ring will have on the MAO-A and –B inhibition potencies of 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine. Based on the results, additional 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues with improved MAO-A and –B inhibition potencies will be proposed for investigation in future studies. Methods: The target, 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine, analogues were synthesized by reacting 1,3- dimethyl-5,6-diaminouracil with the appropriately substituted phenoxyacetic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide coupling agent. Ring closure was catalyzed in basic conditions and methylation of the resulting theophyline intermediates at C-7 was carried out with iodomethane. The structures and purities of all the target compounds were verified by NMR, MS and HPLC analysis. All of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues were subsequently evaluated as MAO-A and –B inhibitors using the recombinant human enzymes. The inhibition potencies of the analogues were expressed as the IC50 values (concentration of the inhibitor that produces 50% inhibition). In addition, the time-dependency of inhibition of both MAO-A and –B was evaluated for two inhibitors in order to determine if these inhibitors interact reversibly or irreversibly with the MAO isozymes. A Hansch-type quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study was carried out in order to quantify the effect that different substituents on the phenyl ring of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues have on MAO-B inhibition activity. Results: The results showed that among the test compounds, several analogues potently inhibited human MAO-B. The most potent inhibitor was 8-(3-bromophenoxymethyl)caffeine with an IC50 value of 0.148 μM toward human MAO-B. There were also inhibitors which displayed inhibition activities towards human MAO-A with IC50 values ranging from 4.59 μM to 34.0 μM. Compared to the 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues, that were in general non-selective inhibitors, the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, evaluated here, were selective for MAO-B. For example, 8-(3-bromophenoxymethyl)caffeine was found to be 141 fold more selective as an inhibitor of MAO-B than of MAO-A. Also, compared to the 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues, the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues were slightly less potent MAO-B inhibitors. For example, 8-benzyloxycaffeine is reported to have an IC50 value of 1.77 μM for the inhibition of human MAO-B while 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine was found to have an IC50 value of 5.78 μM for the inhibition of human MAO-B. This study also shows that two selected analogues bind reversibly to MAO-A and –B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO-B inhibition is competitive for one representative compound. Qualitative inspection of the results revealed interesting structure-activity relationships. For the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, bearing both the C3 and C4 substituents on the phenyl ring, the MAO-B activity significantly increases with halogen substitution. Furthermore, increased MAO-B inhibition was observed with increased electronegativity of the halogen substituent. To quantify these apparent relationships, a Hansch-type QSAR study was carried out. The results showed that the logarithm of the IC50 values (logIC50) correlated with Hansch lipophilicity (π) and the Swain-Lupton electronic (F) constants of the substituents at C-3 of the phenoxymethyl ring. The correlation exhibited an R2 value of 0.87 and a statistical F value of 13.6. From these results it may be concluded that electron-withdrawing substituents at C3 with a high degree of lipophilicity enhance MAO-B inhibition potency. These results are similar to those previously obtained for the series of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. For this series, the MAO-B inhibition potencies correlated with the Hansch lipophilicity (π) and Hammett electronic (σ) constants of the substituents at C-3 of the benzyloxy ring. Similarly to the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, electron-withdrawing substituents with a high degree of lipophilicity also enhance the MAO-B inhibition potencies of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011

Purpose Monoamine oxidase (MAO) consists of two isoforms, namely MAO-A and MAO-B. Both these isoforms are involved in the oxidation of dopamine. In Parkinson’s disease (PD) therapy, the inhibition of the oxidation of dopamine by MAO may elevate the levels of dopamine in the brain and prevent the generation of toxic by-products such as hydrogen peroxide. MAO-B inhibitors have found application as monotherapy in PD and it has been shown that MAO-B inhibitors may also be useful as adjuvants to L-dopa in PD therapy. For example, an earlier study has shown that the combination of L-dopa with (R)-deprenyl (a selective MAO-B inhibitor), may lead to a reduction of the dose of L-dopa required for alleviating the motor symptoms in PD patients. However, older MAO inhibitors may possess adverse side effects such as psychotoxicity, liver toxicity and cardiovascular effects. The irreversible mode of inhibition of the older MAO-B inhibitors, such as (R)-deprenyl, may also be considered as less desirable. After the use of irreversible inhibitors, it may require several weeks for the MAO enzyme to recover activity. In contrast, after administration of a reversible inhibitor, enzyme activity is recovered as soon as the inhibitor is cleared form the tissues. The adverse effects and disadvantages of the older MAO-B inhibitors prompted us to undertake the discovery of safer and reversible inhibitors of MAO-B. Such compounds may find application in the treatment of PD. Rationale It was recently discovered that (E)-8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is a potent inhibitor of MAO-B, with an IC50 value of 0.128 µM. CSC has a caffeine moiety, which is thought to be essential for MAO-B inhibition. It was also reported that a related series of 8- (phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives are potent and reversible inhibitors of MAO-A and –B. The IC50 values of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines ranged from 0.148–5.78 µM for the inhibition of MAO-B. For the purpose of this study the phenoxymethyl side-chain was replaced with a phenylsulfanyl moiety at C8. The aim of this study was therefore to synthesize a series of 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine analogues and to compare their MAO-B inhibition potencies to the previously synthesised 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives. A series of five 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine analogues was also synthesized in order to determine the effect of carbon chain elongation on the potency of MAO inhibition. O C-8 N N O N N Caffeine Cl O N N (E) O N N CSC O N N O O N N 8-(Phenoxymethyl)caffeine O N N O N N S 8-[(Phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine O N N S O N N 8-[(Phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine Compound R1 R2 1a H H 1b Cl H 1c Br H 1d F H 1e CH3 H 1f OCH3 H 1g OCH2CH3 H 1h H Cl 1i H Br Compound R1 R2 2a H H 2b Cl H 2c Br H 2d H Cl 2e H Br Methods The C8 substituted caffeine analogues were synthesised by reacting 1,3-dimethyl-5,6-diaminouracil with an appropriately substituted 2-(phenylsulfanyl)acetic acid or 3-(phenylsulfanyl)propanoic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide activating reagent, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDAC). Ring closure of the intermediary amide was effected by reaction with sodium hydroxide. Resulting theophylline analogues were subsequently methylated in the presence of iodomethane to yield the target compounds. The structures of the C8 substituted caffeine analogues were verified by NMR and MS analysis. The purities thereof were subsequently estimated by HPLC analysis. The 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine and 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine analogues were evaluated as MAO-A and –B inhibitors. The recombinant human enzymes were used as enzyme sources. The inhibitory potencies of the caffeine derivatives were expressed as IC50 values (the concentration of a drug that is required for 50% inhibition in vitro). The time- dependency of inhibition of MAO-B by the most potent inhibitor was also evaluated in order to determine the reversibility of inhibition of the test compound. A study was also conducted to determine the inhibition mode of the most potent test compound, by constructing a set of Lineweaver Burk plots. Results The results showed that the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine analogues were inhibitors of MAO-A and –B. The most potent inhibitor in the first series (1a–i) of this study were 8-[(3- bromophenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine and 8-[(4-bromophenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine with IC50 values of 4.90 and 4.05 µM, respectively. When these results were compared to those of the previously studied 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives it was found that, for these compounds, the bromine substituted homologues were also the most potent MAO-B inhibitors. The bromine substituted 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives exhibited IC50 values of 0.148 and 0.189 µM for those homologues containing bromine on the meta and para positions of the phenoxy side chain, respectively. In general, the 8- [(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives were found to be less potent MAO-B inhibitors than the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives. The 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives also did not show as high a degree of selectivity for MAO-B (compared to MAO- A) as did the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines. Similar to the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines, the 8- [(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeines also proved to be weak MAO-A inhibitors. The most potent inhibitor of MAO-A among the test compounds exhibited an IC50 value of 19.4 µM. The most potent MAO-A inhibitor among the previously studied 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines was more potent with an IC50 value of 4.59 µM. From these results it may be concluded that the phenoxy side chain is more suited for the design of caffeine derived MAO inhibitors than the phenylsulfanyl side chain. The results for the second series investigated in this study, the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeines (2a–e), revealed the chlorine substituted derivatives to be the most potent MAO-B inhibitors. The meta and para chlorine substituted derivatives exhibited IC50 values of 5.67 and 7.79 µM, respectively, for the inhibition of MAO-B. Interestingly, the meta substituted derivative exhibited no inhibition toward the MAO-A isoenzyme. However, the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine derivatives were found to be very weak inhibitors of both MAO-A and –B and may be considered as less potent than the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives. Since one of the aims of this study was to synthesise reversible MAO inhibitors, a time- dependency study was carried out with the best inhibitor (1i). The aim of this study was to determine the reversibility of inhibition by the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives. From the results, it was concluded that the inhibition of MAO-B by compound 1i is reversible. To determine the mode of inhibition, a set of Lineweaver-Burk plots was constructed and since the plots were linear and intersected on the y-axis, it was concluded that 1i is a competitive inhibitor of MAO-B. Conclusion This study concludes that the phenoxymethyl side-chain is more suited for the design of caffeine derived MAO-B inhibitors than the (phenylsulfanyl)methyl side-chain. / Thesis (MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

Purpose Monoamine oxidase (MAO) consists of two isoforms, namely MAO-A and MAO-B. Both these isoforms are involved in the oxidation of dopamine. In Parkinson’s disease (PD) therapy, the inhibition of the oxidation of dopamine by MAO may elevate the levels of dopamine in the brain and prevent the generation of toxic by-products such as hydrogen peroxide. MAO-B inhibitors have found application as monotherapy in PD and it has been shown that MAO-B inhibitors may also be useful as adjuvants to L-dopa in PD therapy. For example, an earlier study has shown that the combination of L-dopa with (R)-deprenyl (a selective MAO-B inhibitor), may lead to a reduction of the dose of L-dopa required for alleviating the motor symptoms in PD patients. However, older MAO inhibitors may possess adverse side effects such as psychotoxicity, liver toxicity and cardiovascular effects. The irreversible mode of inhibition of the older MAO-B inhibitors, such as (R)-deprenyl, may also be considered as less desirable. After the use of irreversible inhibitors, it may require several weeks for the MAO enzyme to recover activity. In contrast, after administration of a reversible inhibitor, enzyme activity is recovered as soon as the inhibitor is cleared form the tissues. The adverse effects and disadvantages of the older MAO-B inhibitors prompted us to undertake the discovery of safer and reversible inhibitors of MAO-B. Such compounds may find application in the treatment of PD. Rationale It was recently discovered that (E)-8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is a potent inhibitor of MAO-B, with an IC50 value of 0.128 µM. CSC has a caffeine moiety, which is thought to be essential for MAO-B inhibition. It was also reported that a related series of 8- (phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives are potent and reversible inhibitors of MAO-A and –B. The IC50 values of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines ranged from 0.148–5.78 µM for the inhibition of MAO-B. For the purpose of this study the phenoxymethyl side-chain was replaced with a phenylsulfanyl moiety at C8. The aim of this study was therefore to synthesize a series of 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine analogues and to compare their MAO-B inhibition potencies to the previously synthesised 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives. A series of five 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine analogues was also synthesized in order to determine the effect of carbon chain elongation on the potency of MAO inhibition. O C-8 N N O N N Caffeine Cl O N N (E) O N N CSC O N N O O N N 8-(Phenoxymethyl)caffeine O N N O N N S 8-[(Phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine O N N S O N N 8-[(Phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine Compound R1 R2 1a H H 1b Cl H 1c Br H 1d F H 1e CH3 H 1f OCH3 H 1g OCH2CH3 H 1h H Cl 1i H Br Compound R1 R2 2a H H 2b Cl H 2c Br H 2d H Cl 2e H Br Methods The C8 substituted caffeine analogues were synthesised by reacting 1,3-dimethyl-5,6-diaminouracil with an appropriately substituted 2-(phenylsulfanyl)acetic acid or 3-(phenylsulfanyl)propanoic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide activating reagent, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDAC). Ring closure of the intermediary amide was effected by reaction with sodium hydroxide. Resulting theophylline analogues were subsequently methylated in the presence of iodomethane to yield the target compounds. The structures of the C8 substituted caffeine analogues were verified by NMR and MS analysis. The purities thereof were subsequently estimated by HPLC analysis. The 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine and 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine analogues were evaluated as MAO-A and –B inhibitors. The recombinant human enzymes were used as enzyme sources. The inhibitory potencies of the caffeine derivatives were expressed as IC50 values (the concentration of a drug that is required for 50% inhibition in vitro). The time- dependency of inhibition of MAO-B by the most potent inhibitor was also evaluated in order to determine the reversibility of inhibition of the test compound. A study was also conducted to determine the inhibition mode of the most potent test compound, by constructing a set of Lineweaver Burk plots. Results The results showed that the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine analogues were inhibitors of MAO-A and –B. The most potent inhibitor in the first series (1a–i) of this study were 8-[(3- bromophenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine and 8-[(4-bromophenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine with IC50 values of 4.90 and 4.05 µM, respectively. When these results were compared to those of the previously studied 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives it was found that, for these compounds, the bromine substituted homologues were also the most potent MAO-B inhibitors. The bromine substituted 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives exhibited IC50 values of 0.148 and 0.189 µM for those homologues containing bromine on the meta and para positions of the phenoxy side chain, respectively. In general, the 8- [(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives were found to be less potent MAO-B inhibitors than the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine derivatives. The 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives also did not show as high a degree of selectivity for MAO-B (compared to MAO- A) as did the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines. Similar to the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines, the 8- [(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeines also proved to be weak MAO-A inhibitors. The most potent inhibitor of MAO-A among the test compounds exhibited an IC50 value of 19.4 µM. The most potent MAO-A inhibitor among the previously studied 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeines was more potent with an IC50 value of 4.59 µM. From these results it may be concluded that the phenoxy side chain is more suited for the design of caffeine derived MAO inhibitors than the phenylsulfanyl side chain. The results for the second series investigated in this study, the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeines (2a–e), revealed the chlorine substituted derivatives to be the most potent MAO-B inhibitors. The meta and para chlorine substituted derivatives exhibited IC50 values of 5.67 and 7.79 µM, respectively, for the inhibition of MAO-B. Interestingly, the meta substituted derivative exhibited no inhibition toward the MAO-A isoenzyme. However, the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]caffeine derivatives were found to be very weak inhibitors of both MAO-A and –B and may be considered as less potent than the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives. Since one of the aims of this study was to synthesise reversible MAO inhibitors, a time- dependency study was carried out with the best inhibitor (1i). The aim of this study was to determine the reversibility of inhibition by the 8-[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]caffeine derivatives. From the results, it was concluded that the inhibition of MAO-B by compound 1i is reversible. To determine the mode of inhibition, a set of Lineweaver-Burk plots was constructed and since the plots were linear and intersected on the y-axis, it was concluded that 1i is a competitive inhibitor of MAO-B. Conclusion This study concludes that the phenoxymethyl side-chain is more suited for the design of caffeine derived MAO-B inhibitors than the (phenylsulfanyl)methyl side-chain. / Thesis (MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

Purpose: Monoamine oxidase (MAO) plays a key role in the treatment of Parkinson‟s disease (PD), since it is the major enzyme responsible for the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO-B may conserve dopamine in the brain and provide symptomatic relief. The MAO-B inhibitors that are currently used for the treatment of PD, are associated with a variety of adverse effects (psychotoxic and cardiovascular effects) along with additional disadvantages such as irreversible inhibition of the enzyme. Irreversible inhibition may be considered a disadvantage, since following treatment with irreversible inhibitors, the rate by which the enzyme activity is recovered may be variable and may require several weeks. In contrast, following the administration of reversible inhibitors, enzyme activity is recovered when the inhibitor is cleared from the tissues. There exists therefore, a need to develop new reversible inhibitors of MAO-B which are considered to be safer than irreversible MAO-B inhibitors. Rationale: Recently discovered reversible MAO-B inhibitors include safinamide and (E)-8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC). Safinamide has a benzyloxy side chain, which is thought to be important for inhibition of MAO-B. CSC, on the other hand, consists of a caffeine moiety with a styryl substituent at C-8, which is also a critical feature for its inhibitory activity. In a previous study, the caffeine ring and the benzyloxy side chain were combined to produce a series of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues which proved to be potent new MAO-B inhibitors. In this study, caffeine was substituted with the phenoxymethyl functional group at C-8, instead of the benzyloxy moiety. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the MAO-B inhibition potencies of selected 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues with the previously studied 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. In the current study, 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine (1) and nine 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues (2-10) were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of recombinant human MAOA and –B. These analogues only differed in substitution on C3 and C4 of the phenoxymethyl phenyl ring. The substituents that were selected were halogens (Cl, F, and Br), the methyl group, the methoxy group and the trifluoromethyl group. These substituents are similar to those selected in a previous study where 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues were evaluated as MAO inhibitors. This study therefore explores the effect that a variety of substituents on C3 and C4 of the phenoxymethyl phenyl ring will have on the MAO-A and –B inhibition potencies of 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine. Based on the results, additional 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues with improved MAO-A and –B inhibition potencies will be proposed for investigation in future studies. Methods: The target, 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine, analogues were synthesized by reacting 1,3- dimethyl-5,6-diaminouracil with the appropriately substituted phenoxyacetic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide coupling agent. Ring closure was catalyzed in basic conditions and methylation of the resulting theophyline intermediates at C-7 was carried out with iodomethane. The structures and purities of all the target compounds were verified by NMR, MS and HPLC analysis. All of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues were subsequently evaluated as MAO-A and –B inhibitors using the recombinant human enzymes. The inhibition potencies of the analogues were expressed as the IC50 values (concentration of the inhibitor that produces 50% inhibition). In addition, the time-dependency of inhibition of both MAO-A and –B was evaluated for two inhibitors in order to determine if these inhibitors interact reversibly or irreversibly with the MAO isozymes. A Hansch-type quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study was carried out in order to quantify the effect that different substituents on the phenyl ring of the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues have on MAO-B inhibition activity. Results: The results showed that among the test compounds, several analogues potently inhibited human MAO-B. The most potent inhibitor was 8-(3-bromophenoxymethyl)caffeine with an IC50 value of 0.148 μM toward human MAO-B. There were also inhibitors which displayed inhibition activities towards human MAO-A with IC50 values ranging from 4.59 μM to 34.0 μM. Compared to the 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues, that were in general non-selective inhibitors, the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, evaluated here, were selective for MAO-B. For example, 8-(3-bromophenoxymethyl)caffeine was found to be 141 fold more selective as an inhibitor of MAO-B than of MAO-A. Also, compared to the 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues, the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues were slightly less potent MAO-B inhibitors. For example, 8-benzyloxycaffeine is reported to have an IC50 value of 1.77 μM for the inhibition of human MAO-B while 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine was found to have an IC50 value of 5.78 μM for the inhibition of human MAO-B. This study also shows that two selected analogues bind reversibly to MAO-A and –B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO-B inhibition is competitive for one representative compound. Qualitative inspection of the results revealed interesting structure-activity relationships. For the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, bearing both the C3 and C4 substituents on the phenyl ring, the MAO-B activity significantly increases with halogen substitution. Furthermore, increased MAO-B inhibition was observed with increased electronegativity of the halogen substituent. To quantify these apparent relationships, a Hansch-type QSAR study was carried out. The results showed that the logarithm of the IC50 values (logIC50) correlated with Hansch lipophilicity (π) and the Swain-Lupton electronic (F) constants of the substituents at C-3 of the phenoxymethyl ring. The correlation exhibited an R2 value of 0.87 and a statistical F value of 13.6. From these results it may be concluded that electron-withdrawing substituents at C3 with a high degree of lipophilicity enhance MAO-B inhibition potency. These results are similar to those previously obtained for the series of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. For this series, the MAO-B inhibition potencies correlated with the Hansch lipophilicity (π) and Hammett electronic (σ) constants of the substituents at C-3 of the benzyloxy ring. Similarly to the 8-(phenoxymethyl)caffeine analogues, electron-withdrawing substituents with a high degree of lipophilicity also enhance the MAO-B inhibition potencies of 8-benzyloxycaffeine analogues. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is characterised by a reduction of dopamine concentration in the striatum due to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Currently, first line treatment of PD includes the use of dopamine precursors, dopamine agonists and inhibitors of enzymatic degradation of dopamine, in an effort to restore dopamine levels and/or its effects. However, all these therapeutic strategies are only symptomatic and unfortunately do not slow, stop or reverse the progression of PD. From the discovery of adenosine A2A receptor-dopamine D2 receptor heteromers and the antagonistic interaction between these receptors, the basis of a new therapeutic approach towards the treatment of PD emerged. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists have been shown to decrease the motor symptoms associated with PD, and are also potentially neuroprotective. The possibility thus exists that the administration of an adenosine A2A antagonist may prevent further neurodegeneration. Furthermore, the antagonism of adenosine A1 receptors has the potential of treating cognitive deficits such as those associated with Alzheimer's disease and PD. Therefore, dual antagonism of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors would be of great benefit since this would potentially treat both the motor as well as the cognitive impairment associated with PD. The affinities (Ki-values between 0.6 mM and 38 mM) of a series of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives were previously illustrated for the adenosine A1, A2A and A3 receptor subtypes by Van Rhee and co-workers (1996). These results prompted this pilot study, which aimed to investigate the potential of the structurally related 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones (dihydropyrimidones) and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines as adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists. In this pilot study, a series of 3,4-dihydropyrimidones and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines were synthesised and evaluated as adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists. Since several adenosine A2A antagonists also exhibit MAO inhibitory activity, the MAO-inhibitory activity of selected derivatives was also assessed. A modified Biginelli one pot synthesis was used for the preparation of both series of compounds under solvent free conditions. A mixture of a β- diketone, aldehyde and urea/guanidine hydrochloride was heated for an appropriate time to afford the desired compounds in good yields. MAO-B inhibition studies comprised of a fluorometric assay where kynuramine was used as substrate. A radioligand binding protocol described in literature was employed to investigate the binding of the compounds to the adenosine A2A and A1 receptors. The displacement of N-[3H]ethyladenosin-5’-uronamide ([3H]NECA) from rat striatal membranes and 1,3-[3H]-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) from rat whole brain membranes, was used in the determination of A2A and A1 affinity, respectively. The results showed that both 3,4-dihydropyrimidones and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines had weak adenosine A2A affinity, with the p-fluorophenyl substituted dihydropyrimidone derivative (1h) in series 1, exhibiting the highest affinity for the adenosine A2A receptor (28.7 μM), followed by the p-chlorophenyl dihydropyrimidine derivative (2c) in series 2 (38.59 μM). Both series showed more promising adenosine A1 receptor affinity in the low micromolar range. The p-bromophenyl substituted derivatives in both series showed the best affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor with Ki-values of 7.39 μM (1b) and 7.9 μM (2b). The pmethoxyphenyl dihydropyrimidone (1d) and p-methylpneyl dihydropyrimidine (2e) derivatives also exhibited reasonable affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor with Ki-values of 8.53 μM and 9.67 μM, respectively. Neither the 3,4-dihydropyrimidones nor the 2-amino-1,4- dihydropyrimidines showed MAO-B inhibitory activity. Comparison of the adenosine A2A affinity of the most potent derivative (1h, Ki = 28.7 μM) from this study with that of the previously synthesised dihydropyridine derivatives (Van Rhee et al., 1996, most potent compound had a Ki = 2.74 mM) reveals that an approximate 100- fold increase in binding affinity for A2A receptors occurred. However, KW6002, a known A2A antagonist, that has already reached clinical trials, has a Ki-value of 7.49 nM. The same trend was observed for adenosine A1 affinity, where the most potent compound (1b) of this study exhibited a Ki-value of 7.39 μM compared to 2.75 mM determined for the most potent dihydropyridine derivatives (Van Rhee et al., 1996). N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), a known adenosine A1 agonist that was used as a reference compound, however had a Kivalue of 10.4 nM. The increase in both adenosine A1 and A2A affinity can most likely be ascribed to the increase in nitrogens in the heterocyclic ring (from a dihydropyridine to a dihydropyrimidine) since similar results were obtained by Gillespie and co-workers in 2009 for a series of pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives. In their case it was found that increasing the number of nitrogens in the heterocyclic ring (from one to two nitrogen atoms for the pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives respectively) increased affinity for the adenosine A2A and adenosine A1 receptor subtypes, while three nitrogen atoms in the ring (triazine derivatives) were associated with decreased affinity. It thus appears that two nitrogen atoms in the ring (pyrimidine) are required for optimum adenosine A1 and A2A receptor affinity. The poor adenosine A2A affinity exhibited by the compounds of this study can probably be attributed to the absence of an aromatic heterocyclic ring. The amino acid, Phe-168 plays a very important role in the binding site of the A2A receptor, where it forms aromatic - - stacking interactions with the heterocyclic aromatic ring systems of known agonists and antagonists. Since the dihydropyrimidine ring in both series of this pilot study was not aromatic, the formation of aromatic - -stacking interactions with Phe-168 is unlikely. In conclusion, the 3,4-dihydropyrimidone and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidine scaffolds can be used as a lead for the design of novel adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists, although further structural modifications are required before a clinically viable candidate will be available as potential treatment of PD. / MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is characterised by a reduction of dopamine concentration in the striatum due to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Currently, first line treatment of PD includes the use of dopamine precursors, dopamine agonists and inhibitors of enzymatic degradation of dopamine, in an effort to restore dopamine levels and/or its effects. However, all these therapeutic strategies are only symptomatic and unfortunately do not slow, stop or reverse the progression of PD. From the discovery of adenosine A2A receptor-dopamine D2 receptor heteromers and the antagonistic interaction between these receptors, the basis of a new therapeutic approach towards the treatment of PD emerged. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists have been shown to decrease the motor symptoms associated with PD, and are also potentially neuroprotective. The possibility thus exists that the administration of an adenosine A2A antagonist may prevent further neurodegeneration. Furthermore, the antagonism of adenosine A1 receptors has the potential of treating cognitive deficits such as those associated with Alzheimer's disease and PD. Therefore, dual antagonism of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors would be of great benefit since this would potentially treat both the motor as well as the cognitive impairment associated with PD. The affinities (Ki-values between 0.6 mM and 38 mM) of a series of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives were previously illustrated for the adenosine A1, A2A and A3 receptor subtypes by Van Rhee and co-workers (1996). These results prompted this pilot study, which aimed to investigate the potential of the structurally related 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones (dihydropyrimidones) and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines as adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists. In this pilot study, a series of 3,4-dihydropyrimidones and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines were synthesised and evaluated as adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists. Since several adenosine A2A antagonists also exhibit MAO inhibitory activity, the MAO-inhibitory activity of selected derivatives was also assessed. A modified Biginelli one pot synthesis was used for the preparation of both series of compounds under solvent free conditions. A mixture of a β- diketone, aldehyde and urea/guanidine hydrochloride was heated for an appropriate time to afford the desired compounds in good yields. MAO-B inhibition studies comprised of a fluorometric assay where kynuramine was used as substrate. A radioligand binding protocol described in literature was employed to investigate the binding of the compounds to the adenosine A2A and A1 receptors. The displacement of N-[3H]ethyladenosin-5’-uronamide ([3H]NECA) from rat striatal membranes and 1,3-[3H]-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) from rat whole brain membranes, was used in the determination of A2A and A1 affinity, respectively. The results showed that both 3,4-dihydropyrimidones and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidines had weak adenosine A2A affinity, with the p-fluorophenyl substituted dihydropyrimidone derivative (1h) in series 1, exhibiting the highest affinity for the adenosine A2A receptor (28.7 μM), followed by the p-chlorophenyl dihydropyrimidine derivative (2c) in series 2 (38.59 μM). Both series showed more promising adenosine A1 receptor affinity in the low micromolar range. The p-bromophenyl substituted derivatives in both series showed the best affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor with Ki-values of 7.39 μM (1b) and 7.9 μM (2b). The pmethoxyphenyl dihydropyrimidone (1d) and p-methylpneyl dihydropyrimidine (2e) derivatives also exhibited reasonable affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor with Ki-values of 8.53 μM and 9.67 μM, respectively. Neither the 3,4-dihydropyrimidones nor the 2-amino-1,4- dihydropyrimidines showed MAO-B inhibitory activity. Comparison of the adenosine A2A affinity of the most potent derivative (1h, Ki = 28.7 μM) from this study with that of the previously synthesised dihydropyridine derivatives (Van Rhee et al., 1996, most potent compound had a Ki = 2.74 mM) reveals that an approximate 100- fold increase in binding affinity for A2A receptors occurred. However, KW6002, a known A2A antagonist, that has already reached clinical trials, has a Ki-value of 7.49 nM. The same trend was observed for adenosine A1 affinity, where the most potent compound (1b) of this study exhibited a Ki-value of 7.39 μM compared to 2.75 mM determined for the most potent dihydropyridine derivatives (Van Rhee et al., 1996). N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), a known adenosine A1 agonist that was used as a reference compound, however had a Kivalue of 10.4 nM. The increase in both adenosine A1 and A2A affinity can most likely be ascribed to the increase in nitrogens in the heterocyclic ring (from a dihydropyridine to a dihydropyrimidine) since similar results were obtained by Gillespie and co-workers in 2009 for a series of pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives. In their case it was found that increasing the number of nitrogens in the heterocyclic ring (from one to two nitrogen atoms for the pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives respectively) increased affinity for the adenosine A2A and adenosine A1 receptor subtypes, while three nitrogen atoms in the ring (triazine derivatives) were associated with decreased affinity. It thus appears that two nitrogen atoms in the ring (pyrimidine) are required for optimum adenosine A1 and A2A receptor affinity. The poor adenosine A2A affinity exhibited by the compounds of this study can probably be attributed to the absence of an aromatic heterocyclic ring. The amino acid, Phe-168 plays a very important role in the binding site of the A2A receptor, where it forms aromatic - - stacking interactions with the heterocyclic aromatic ring systems of known agonists and antagonists. Since the dihydropyrimidine ring in both series of this pilot study was not aromatic, the formation of aromatic - -stacking interactions with Phe-168 is unlikely. In conclusion, the 3,4-dihydropyrimidone and 2-amino-1,4-dihydropyrimidine scaffolds can be used as a lead for the design of novel adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists, although further structural modifications are required before a clinically viable candidate will be available as potential treatment of PD. / MSc (Pharmaceutical Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014