The United States (U.S.) military withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 was met with turmoil as Taliban regained control of most of the country, including Kabul. These events have affected many and were widely discussed on social media, especially in the U.S. In this work, we focus on Twitter discourse regarding these events, especially potential opinion shifts over time and the effect social media posts by established U.S. legislators might have had on online public perception. To this end, we investigate two datasets on the war in Afghanistan, consisting of Twitter posts by self-identified U.S. accounts and conversation threads initiated by U.S. politicians. We find that Twitter users' discussions revolve around the Kabul airport event, President Biden's handling of the situation, and people affected by the U.S. withdrawal. Microframe analysis indicates that discourse centers the humanitarianism underlying these occurrences and politically leans liberal, focusing on care and fairness. Lastly, network analysis shows that Republicans are far more active on Twitter compared to Democrats and there is more positive sentiment than negative in their conversations. / Master of Science / The United States (U.S.) military withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 was met with turmoil as Taliban regained control of most of the country, including Kabul. These events have affected many and were widely discussed on social media, especially in the U.S. In this work, we focus on Twitter regarding these events, and study if public's opinion change over time especially by the posts of legislators. Therefore, we used two datasets about unrest in Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover. One datasets consists of of Twitter posts by self-identified U.S. accounts and the other one are the conversation threads initiated by U.S. politicians. We find that Twitter users' discussions revolve around the Kabul airport event, President Biden's handling of the situation, and people affected by the U.S. withdrawal. According to our findings based on several methods analyzing the content of the posts of Twitter users, the pressing issues are the humanitarian concerns for the people who could be the target of Taliban. Last but not least, we also studied the relationship between legislators and twitter users along with the dominant sentiment about the topic. Our analysis shows that Republicans are far more active on Twitter compare to Democrats and there is more positive sentiment than negative in their conversations.

No description available.

<p>Language “in the wild” is complex and ambiguous and relies on a shared understanding of the world for its interpretation. Most current natural language processing methods represent language by learning word co-occurrence patterns from massive amounts of linguistic data. This representation can be very powerful, but it is insufficient to capture the meaning behind written and spoken communication. </p> <p> </p> <p>In this dissertation, I will motivate neural-symbolic representations for dealing with these challenges. On the one hand, symbols have inherent explanatory power, and they can help us express contextual knowledge and enforce consistency across different decisions. On the other hand, neural networks allow us to learn expressive distributed representations and make sense of large amounts of linguistic data. I will introduce a holistic framework that covers all stages of the neural-symbolic pipeline: modeling, learning, inference, and its application for diverse discourse scenarios, such as analyzing online discussions, mining argumentative structures, and understanding public discourse at scale. I will show the advantages of neural-symbolic representations with respect to end-to-end neural approaches and traditional statistical relational learning methods.</p> <p><br></p> <p>In addition to this, I will demonstrate the advantages of neural-symbolic representations for learning in low-supervision settings, as well as their capabilities to decompose and explain high-level decision. Lastly, I will explore interactive protocols to help human experts in making sense of large repositories of textual data, and leverage neural-symbolic representations as the interface to inject expert human knowledge in the process of partitioning, classifying and organizing large language resources. </p>

<p>Nowadays an increasing number of people consume, share, and interact with information online. This results in posting and counter-posting on online media by different ideological groups on various polarized topics. Consequently, online media has become the primary platform for political and social influencers to directly interact with the citizens and share their perspectives, views, and stances with the goal of gaining support for their actions, bills, and legislation. Hence, understanding the perspectives and the influencing strategies in online media texts is important for an individual to avoid misinformation and improve trust between the general people and the influencers and the authoritative figures such as the government.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Automatically understanding the perspectives in online media is difficult because of two major challenges. Firstly, the proper grammar or mechanism to characterize the perspectives is not available. Recent studies in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have leveraged resources from social science to explain perspectives. For example, Policy Framing and Moral Foundation Theory are used for understanding how issues are framed and the moral appeal expressed in texts to gain support. However, these theories often fail to capture the nuances in perspectives and cannot generalize over all topics and events. Our research in this dissertation is one of the first studies that adapt social science theories in Natural Language Processing for understanding perspectives to the extent that they can capture differences in ideologies or stances. The second key challenge in understanding perspectives in online media texts is that annotated data is difficult to obtain to build automatic methods to detect the perspectives, that can generalize over the large corpus of online media text on different topics. To tackle this problem, in this dissertation, we used weak sources of supervision such as social network interaction of users who produce and interact with the messages, weak human interaction, or artificial few-shot data using Large Language Models. </p> <p><br></p> <p>Our insight is that various tasks such as perspectives, stances, sentiments toward entities, etc. are interdependent when characterizing online media messages. As a result, we proposed approaches that jointly model various interdependent problems such as perspectives, stances, sentiments toward entities, etc., and perform structured prediction to solve them jointly. Our research findings showed that the messaging choices and perspectives on online media in response to various real-life events and their prominence and contrast in different ideological camps can be efficiently captured using our developed methods.</p>