1 |
Effectiveness of occupational therapy in remediating handwriting difficulties in primary students: cognitive versus multisensory interventionsZwicker, Jill G. 23 November 2005 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of cognitive versus multisensory interventions on handwriting legibility of primary students referred to occupational therapy for handwriting difficulties. Using a randomized three-group research design, 72 first and second-grade students were assigned to either a cognitive intervention, multisensory intervention, or no intervention (control) group. Letter legibility was measured before and after 10 weeks of intervention. Analysis of variance of difference scores showed no statistically significant difference between the intervention groups. Grade 1 students improved with or without intervention, but grade 2 students showed dramatic improvement with cognitive intervention compared to multisensory intervention (d = 1.09) or no intervention (d = .92). Several students in both grades showed declining performance in the multisensory and control groups, but no students had lower legibility after cognitive intervention. These results challenge current occupational therapy practice of using a multisensory approach for remediation of handwriting difficulties, especially for students in grade 2.
|
2 |
Effectiveness of occupational therapy in remediating handwriting difficulties in primary students: cognitive versus multisensory interventionsZwicker, Jill G. 23 November 2005 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of cognitive versus multisensory interventions on handwriting legibility of primary students referred to occupational therapy for handwriting difficulties. Using a randomized three-group research design, 72 first and second-grade students were assigned to either a cognitive intervention, multisensory intervention, or no intervention (control) group. Letter legibility was measured before and after 10 weeks of intervention. Analysis of variance of difference scores showed no statistically significant difference between the intervention groups. Grade 1 students improved with or without intervention, but grade 2 students showed dramatic improvement with cognitive intervention compared to multisensory intervention (d = 1.09) or no intervention (d = .92). Several students in both grades showed declining performance in the multisensory and control groups, but no students had lower legibility after cognitive intervention. These results challenge current occupational therapy practice of using a multisensory approach for remediation of handwriting difficulties, especially for students in grade 2.
|
3 |
Factors affecting the reading readiness of Grade R learners in selected preschools in Gauteng ProvinceDu Plessis, Susan 11 1900 (has links)
The topic of this study was to determine the factors affecting the reading readiness of Grade
R learners in selected preschools in Gauteng Province. The purpose of this study was to
explore factors that affect the reading readiness of Grade R learners as understood by teachers
and mothers. The aim of the study was to establish what factors affect the reading readiness
of Grade R learners. The primary research question asked what factors Grade R teachers and
mothers find affect reading readiness. The secondary research questions asked how Grade R
teachers address these factors in the classroom; who the people involved in the learners’
reading readiness are; and how they contribute to reading readiness.
This study employed a multiple case study approach. Data was collected in six preschools in
Johannesburg through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with five Grade R teachers
and five mothers of Grade R learners. A focus group discussion with four Grade R teachers
was also conducted. The main findings of the study were eight factors affecting the reading
readiness of Grade R learners: the learner’s individual developmental level; the learner’s
maturity; the learner’s desire to learn to read; the learner’s phonological awareness; the
learner’s need for play and kinaesthetics; the learner’s parents’ contributions; the learner’s
socioeconomic living conditions; and reading stories to the learner. The implication is that
these findings may improve teaching practice and Grade R curriculum development. / Psychology of Education / M. Ed. (Psychology of Education)
|
Page generated in 0.092 seconds