Background: Patients with nonallergic irritant rhinitis (NAIR) have symptoms of nasal congestion, nasal irritation, rhinorrhea, and sneezing in response to nasal irritants. We currently have no reliable objective means to quantify these patients' subjective symptoms. In this study, we used the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor (TRPV1) receptor agonist, capsaicin, as an intranasal challenge while comparing the changes in blood flow with optical rhinometry between subjects with NAIR and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: Six HCs and 6 NAIR subjects were challenged intranasally with saline solution followed by increasing concentrations of capsaicin (0.005 mM, 0.05 mM, and 0.5 mM) at 15-minute intervals. We recorded maximum optical density (OD) and numeric analog scores (NAS) for nasal congestion, nasal irritation, rhinorrhea, and sneezing for each subject after each challenge. Correlations between NAS and maximum OD were calculated. Results: Maximum OD increased with increasing concentrations of intranasal capsaicin in NAIR subjects. There were significant differences in maximum OD obtained for 0.05 mM and 0.5 mM capsaicin between NAIR subjects and HCs. Significant differences were found in the NAS for nasal irritation at 0.005 mM, 0.05 mM, and 0.5 mM, and nasal congestion at 0.5 mM. Correlation between maximum OD and mean NAS was most significant for 0.05 mM capsaicin. Conclusion: Optical rhinometry with intranasal capsaicin challenge could prove a viable option in the diagnosis of NAIR. Further studies will investigate its use to monitor a patient's response to pharmacologic therapy and provide further information about the underlying mechanisms of NAIR.

Background: Patients with nonallergic irritant rhinitis (NAIR) have symptoms of nasal congestion, nasal irritation, rhinorrhea, and sneezing in response to nasal irritants. We currently have no reliable objective means to quantify these patients' subjective symptoms. In this study, we used the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor (TRPV1) receptor agonist, capsaicin, as an intranasal challenge while comparing the changes in blood flow with optical rhinometry between subjects with NAIR and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: Six HCs and 6 NAIR subjects were challenged intranasally with saline solution followed by increasing concentrations of capsaicin (0.005 mM, 0.05 mM, and 0.5 mM) at 15-minute intervals. We recorded maximum optical density (OD) and numeric analog scores (NAS) for nasal congestion, nasal irritation, rhinorrhea, and sneezing for each subject after each challenge. Correlations between NAS and maximum OD were calculated. Results: Maximum OD increased with increasing concentrations of intranasal capsaicin in NAIR subjects. There were significant differences in maximum OD obtained for 0.05 mM and 0.5 mM capsaicin between NAIR subjects and HCs. Significant differences were found in the NAS for nasal irritation at 0.005 mM, 0.05 mM, and 0.5 mM, and nasal congestion at 0.5 mM. Correlation between maximum OD and mean NAS was most significant for 0.05 mM capsaicin. Conclusion: Optical rhinometry with intranasal capsaicin challenge could prove a viable option in the diagnosis of NAIR. Further studies will investigate its use to monitor a patient's response to pharmacologic therapy and provide further information about the underlying mechanisms of NAIR.

Orientador: Ricardo de Lima Zollner / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-24T18:58:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ZanellatoFabbri_Natalia_D.pdf: 35087770 bytes, checksum: d1d79dc3e2bc0a5a2a05b4261a363a74 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 / Resumo: Apesar das diversas terapias disponíveis para o tratamento da rinite alérgica (RA), muitos pacientes não obtêm alívio dos sintomas com uso de um único fármaco e apresentam frequentemente queixa da manutenção dos sintomas mesmo sob tratamento. Estudos clínicos aleatorizados compararam a eficácia de anti-histamínicos e corticoides intranasais, isolados e associados e demonstraram que as terapias com drogas combinadas apresentam melhores resultados. A RA é um fator de risco para o desenvolvimento de obstrução de VAI e estudos clínicos com pacientes asmáticos demostraram redução da responsividade brônquica e sintomas de asma apenas com tratamento tópico nasal. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar (1) o efeito do tratamento tópico nasal com azelastina (AZE), budesonida (BUD) e combinação AZE/BUD na obstrução nasal e sintomas de RA; (2) o efeito do estímulo nasal inespecífico com histamina na função pulmonar; e (3) o efeito dos tratamentos tópicos nasais na função pulmonar de pacientes com RA. O desenho do presente trabalho foi aleatorizado, cruzado e cego composto por 3 tratamentos. 28 pacientes participaram do estudo, com tratamento tópico nasal de 30 dias e intervalo de 7 dias entre os tratamentos. Os pacientes foram submetidos ao protocolo de TPN com histamina, avaliado por escore de sintomas, rinometria acústica e espirometria. Nossos resultados mostraram que a terapia com AZE/BUD é mais efetiva na prevenção da obstrução nasal e sintomas da RA comparada ao tratamento com as drogas isoladas. Além disso, encontramos indivíduos com alterações na função pulmonar após estímulo nasal inespecífico e controle destas alterações após tratamento tópico nasal, sugerindo influência positiva do tratamento nasal na função pulmonar de indivíduos com hiperreatividade brônquica / Abstract: Despite the several therapies available for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) many patients do not get relief of symptoms using a single drug and often have the maintenance of symptoms even under treatment. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids, isolated and associates, show that the combination drug therapies have better outcomes. The AR is a risk factor for the development of obstruction in lower airways and clinical studies with asthmatic patients demonstrated reduction of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma symptoms after just nasal topical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effect of treatment with topical nasal azelastine (AZE), budesonide (BUD) and combined drugs (AZE/BUD) in nasal obstruction and symptoms of RA; (2) the effect of non-specific nasal challenge with histamine in lung function; and (3) the effect of topical nasal treatment on lung function in patients with RA. The design of this study was randomized, crossover and blind consisting of 3 periods of treatment with nasal sprays. 28 patients participated in the study, composed for 3 periods of treatment (30 days) and 7-day interval between treatments. Patients underwent protocol nasal provocation test with histamine assessed by symptom scores, acoustic rhinometry and spirometry. Our results showed that therapy with AZE/BUD is more effective in preventing nasal obstruction and symptoms of RA compared to treatment with drugs isolated. Furthermore, we find individuals with changes in pulmonary function after nonspecific nasal stimulation and control of these changes after nasal topical treatment, suggesting a positive influence of nasal treatment on lung function in subjects with bronchial hyperreactivity / Doutorado / Clinica Medica / Doutora em Clínica Médica