11 |
The effect of craniocervical flexion exercise on cervical posture and cervical range of motion in asymptomatic participantsCamitsis, Aaryn 10 February 2015 (has links)
Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s degree in technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2013. / Background: Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural abnormality that is commonly associated with weak deep cervical flexor muscles (DCF). The craniovertebral (CV) angle lies between a horizontal line running through C7 spinous process and a line connecting the C7 spinous process to the tragus of the ear. The smaller the angle, the greater the forward head posture. Weak DCF musculature and FHP has been linked to cervical dysfunction in the short and long term such as cervicogenic headache and premature development of cervical regional degenerative joint disease. Improving isometric endurance and neuromotor control of the DCF muscles using craniocervical flexion exercise (CCFE) has been shown to be efficient in patients experiencing cervical dysfunction such as headache, although the relevance of CCFE has not been established in the asymptomatic group. Deficiency in the activity of these muscles can be accurately measured using craniocervical flexion testing (CCFT).
There is a paucity of information regarding the definitive relationship between weakness of the DCF and FHP in asymptomatic participants. This research will help establish an efficient and safe prophylactic treatment protocol preventing long term sequela associated with FHP.
Objectives: To determine the effect of CCFE on cervical posture by assessment of the CV angle in asymptomatic participants as well as to determine the effect of CCFE on cervical range of motion by assessment of flexion, extension, bilateral rotation and lateral flexion movements in asymptomatic participants whilst measuring the effect of CCFE on isometric endurance and neuromotor control of the DCF muscles assessed by the CCFT in asymptomatic participants.
Method: This is a quantitative pre/post intervention study comparing the results of one group of 45 asymptomatic participants before and after the CCFE protocol has been allocated to them over a period of 3-5 weeks. Participants FHP was assessed by measuring the CV angle. This was done by marking the C7 spinous process and extending a horizontal line toward the shoulder. Then marking the tragus of the ipsilateral ear and measuring the angle using the smart tool angle finder (MD products). iv CCFT measurements were taken and the CCFE protocol allocated to those who qualified to take part in the study. Lastly, cervical range of motion was measured.
This group received a home exercise protocol of 3 sets of 10 supine chin tucks daily with each repetition being held for 10 seconds. The technique was first ensured by the researcher prior to leaving the consultation rooms and an exercise diary was given to the participant until the 5th and final consultation to record the progress and efficiency of the home programme as well as any complaints regarding this.
Result: The asymptomatic group included in the study improved in both the seated and standing CV angle measurements in that the CV was greater at the conclusion of the pre/post intervention (p=0.00000002) and (p=0.000003) respectively . Cervical range of motion showed improvement in some but not all ranges. Flexion showed a reduction in range of motion (p=0.0086) which was significant. Extension showed an improvement in range of motion (p=0.0000002) which was significant. Rotation toward the left (p=0.00003) and right (p=0.00063) showed an improvement in range of motion which was significant. Lateral flexion showed improvement which was not significant in both, left (p=0.0145) and right (p= 0.24985) ranges of motion. Neuromotor control showed 100 percent improvement in that all 45 of the participants were able to perform CCFT correctly through all five stages at conclusion of the study.
Conclusion: Therefore it can be concluded that asymptomatic participants will benefit from CCFEs In terms of CV angle improvement, cervical range of motion as well as neuromotor control of the DCF muscles.
|
12 |
A comparative study to determine the effectiveness of oral and parenteral Traumeel®S versus spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of mechanical posterior neck pain17 June 2009 (has links)
M.Tech.
|
13 |
Cervical radiculopathy effects of surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar : a prospective, randomised study /Persson, Liselott C. G. January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Lund University, 1998. / Added t.p. with thesis statement inserted.
|
14 |
Cervical radiculopathy effects of surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar : a prospective, randomised study /Persson, Liselott C. G. January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Lund University, 1998. / Added t.p. with thesis statement inserted.
|
15 |
The relative efficacy of two varied chiropractic manipulative techniques in the treatment of mechanical upper thoracic and neck painRitchie, Bruce Andrew January 1997 (has links)
A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1997. / The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the spinous push versus the transverse process contact rotary type adjustments in the treatment of sub-acute and chronic mechanical upper thoracic and neck pain. It was hypothesized that both adjustments, over a maximum of nine treatments with two treatments per week and a further four week follow-up period, would be effective in terms of improving the patients' cervical ranges of motion, vertebral pressure pain threshold levels and their perceptions of pain and disability. The study design was a randomized, un-blinded, un-controlled comparative group study with a sample population consisting of thirty consecutive patients (Ave. age 35.4 years; M:F 16: 14) suffering from joint dysfunction of the cervical or upper thoracic spine. Each group received one adjustment two times a week for a maximum of nine treatments. Soft tissue therapy was employed in each treatment as a pre-adjustment procedure. The objective data collected was goniometrically assessed cervical range of motion and algometrically assessed vertebral pressure pain thresholds. The subjective data was collected by means of the CMCC Neck Disability, the Short Form McGill Pain and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale-l0 1 Questionnaires. / M
|
16 |
The effectiveness of manipulation combined with a cervical pillow compared to manipulation alone in the management of mechanical neck painAllwood, Tracey Elaine January 2001 (has links)
Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 2001. / Neck pain is a common condition that has become a serious health concern. Since there is controversy regarding the most effective management of this condition, further research needs to be executed. The purpose of this investigation was to compare manipulation combined with a cervical pillow to manipulation alone in the management of mechanical neck pain. The rationale behind this, was that manipulation is one of the most common treatments for spinal conditions and has shown significant results in alleviating mechanical neck pain. Cervical pillows have been investigated by various researchers. They have concluded that cervical pillows are effective in treating mechanical neck pain. Thus, using the pillow as an adjunct to manipulation should attain superior results to manipulation alone. This study consisted of 40 patients who were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. The average age of the patients was 34 years old and the average duration of neck pain was pain of greater than 6 months. The patients received 6 treatments over a 4 week period. Group1 were manipulated and given a cervical pillow to sleep on, while group 2 received manipulation alone. / M
|
17 |
The relative effectiveness of manipulation versus a combination of manipulation and oral Traumeel S in the treatment of mechanical neck painHarpham, Graeme John January 2005 (has links)
Mini-dissertation in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban Institute of Technology, 2005. / According to the recent literature the application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) is the mainstay and first line of conventional treatment for many types of pain, including that of spinal origin (DiPalma and DiGregorio 1994; Dabbs and Lauretti 1995; Koes et al. 1997). NSAID therapy has inherent side effects (Goodman and Simon 1994), however, given the risks involved, they are still of value as an adjunct to spinal manipulation (Crawford 1988), which has been shown to have less side effects and be more effective than conventional NSAIDS (Dabbs and Lauretti 1995; Giles and Müller 1999). A homeopathic alternative to NSAIDS is Traumeel S, it fulfils all the criteria for a locally acting therapeutic medication, with promotion of the natural healing process, and minimum side effects (Zell et al. 1989). A study by Hepburn (2000) compared the relative efficacy of Traumeel S against NSAIDS in the treatment of cervical facet syndrome. Hepburn concluded that there was statistically no difference between the two therapies. It could therefore be inferred that Traumeel S may be a valid alternative to NSAID therapy in the treatment of cervical facet syndrome. This study tested this hypothesis by comparing the effectiveness of spinal manipulation with the concurrent administration of oral Traumeel S against spinal manipulation alone in order to assess the potential benefit of combining Traumeel S with manipulation. / M
|
18 |
An investigation into the contributing factors associated with work related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulders in non- secretarial computer users in a selected corporate banking environmentPeek, Nigel Richard January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (M.Tech.:Chiropractic)-Dept. of Chiropractic, Durban Institute of Technology, 2005
xii, [137] leaves / Musculoskeletal injuries in computer users are an increasing concern. The computer has become an essential working tool that is used throughout all levels of companies and organisations. Management and professional personnel are required to use computers, often without training in typing skills, this combined with higher stress and responsibility levels and lengthy work hours. Potentially this makes them a high-risk group for work related injury. Previous research has focused mainly on data entry and secretarial workers, who are often competent in typing and keyboard skills.
There is an increasing body of literature that implicates a wide variety of factors responsible for computer and office related musculoskeletal injury, however there is still much conflict as to what factors play the most influential role in development of these disorders. Conflict largely remains over the role of individual and constitutional factors versus workplace factors such as ergonomic design and patterns of computer use. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the prevalence of and related risk factors associated with work related musculoskeletal injuries of the neck and shoulder in non-secretarial computer users within the South African context.
|
19 |
Association of physical activity during leisure time and pain at the lower back and neckWoo, Chuen-hau, Alexander. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (M.Med.Sc.)--University of Hong Kong, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 113-133). Also available in print.
|
20 |
Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache /Amiri, Mohsen. January 2003 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Queensland, 2004. / Includes bibliography.
|
Page generated in 0.0746 seconds