D. Phil., School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2011 / Whether the neuropil is a static, optimally wired entity, whose components must be balanced in a certain way, is an open question. Are the proportions of the components of the neuropil consistent across different mammalian cortices, especially in primates where the cerebral cortex is complexly organized? This question is interesting because the actual biological underpinnings of complex behaviours and intelligence in big-brained primates remain enigmatic and why they seem qualitatively different from other animals in terms of their cognitive abilities. Understanding changes that may have occurred in the brain, especially at the level of neuropil organization, during the evolution in primates is important to our growing understanding of the intellectual abilities and behaviours exhibited by members of this group. The current series of quantitative studies was aimed at investigating variations in the proportionality of the “wire fraction” in three primate species, the olive baboon (Papio anubis), vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops) and the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), in a range of higher and lower order cortical areas, using a newly developed method that involves standard and immunohistochemical staining techniques to reveal and quantify the various profiles of the fine structures of the cerebral cortex. The results of these studies demonstrate clear layer differences in the wire fraction of the cerebral cortex, and for the most part, consistency in the neuropil wire fraction of the same layer across areas of the cerebral cortex within and between individuals of the same species; however, differences in the wire fraction of the neuropil were associated with changes in brain size. It is apparent that the neuropil is not static, as wiring “optimality” changes with layers and brain size and this has functional implications regarding neuronal processing and behavioural outcomes. The adaptive rationale adopted by evolutionary psychology studies to explain behaviours may be erroneous, as adaptation does not always explain sufficiently the emergence of complex behaviours related to brain size increases, especially in primates.

The mushroom bodies (MBs) are insect brain regions important for sensory integration, learning, and memory. In adult worker honey bees (Apis mellifera), the volume of neuropil associated with the MBs is larger in experienced foragers compared with hive bees and less experienced foragers. In addition, the characteristic synaptic structures of the calycal neuropils, the microglomeruli, are larger but present at lower density in 35-day-old foragers relative to 1-day-old workers. Age- and experience-based changes in plasticity of the MBs are assumed to support performance of challenging tasks, but the behavioral consequences of brain plasticity in insects are rarely examined. In this study, foragers were recruited from a field hive to a patch comprising two colors of otherwise identical artificial flowers. Flowers of one color contained a sucrose reward mimicking nectar; flowers of the second were empty. Task difficulty was adjusted by changing flower colors according to the principle of honey bee color vision space. Microglomerular volume and density in the lip (olfactory inputs) and collar (visual inputs) compartments of the MB calyces were analyzed using anti-synapsin I immunolabeling and laser scanning confocal microscopy. Foragers displayed significant variation in microglomerular volume and density, but no correlation was found between these synaptic attributes and foraging performance.

No description available.