Traditional ways to examine and investigate the neural correlates of consciousness usually require the participants to actively report their perceptions and conscious contents. Having the participants actively report can confound the neural correlates with co-occurring processes. Instead, no-report paradigms try to remove the active process of reporting by either objectively trying to measure conscious content by tracking eye movements and pupil dilation, or retroactively inquire about the conscious states. The results of an fMRI experiment utilising tracking of optokinetic nystagmus and pupil dilation as an objective measure of conscious content highlight a difference in frontal areas while activation in posterior areas are similar to active report experiments. EEG experiments utilising the sustained inattentional blindness paradigm did not see the late positivity commonly seen when the participants were aware of the stimuli but it was not task relevant. Utilising no-report paradigms can provide unique insights into the discussion of theories of consciousness and further develop our understanding of consciousness.

Perceptual multistability is a phenomenon that is mostly studied in all modalities separately. The phenomenon reveals fundamental principles of the perceptual system in the formation of an emerging cognitive representation in the consciousness. The momentary perceptual organizations evoked during the stimulation with ambiguous stimuli switches between several perceptual organizations or percepts: The auditory streaming stimulus in audition and the moving plaids stimulus in vision, elicit different at least two percepts that dominate awareness exclusively for a random phase or dominance duration before an inevitable switch to another percept occurs. The similarity in the perceptual experience has led to propose a global mechanism contributing to the perceptual multistability phenomena crossmodally. Contrary, the difference in the perceptual experience has led to propose a distributed mechanism that is modality-specific. The development of a hybrid model has synergized both approaches. We accumulate empirical evidence for the contribution of a global mechanism, albeit distributed mechanisms play an indispensable role in this cross-modal interplay. The overt report of the perceptual experience in our experiments is accompanied by the recording of objective, cognitive markers of the consciousness: Reflexive movements of the eyes, namely the dilation of the pupil and the optokinetic nystagmus, correlate with the unobservable perceptual switches and perceptual states respectively and have their neuronal rooting in the brainstem. We complement earlier findings on the sensitivity of the pupil to visual multistability: It was shown in two independent experiments that the pupil dilates at the time of reported perceptual switches in auditory multistability. A control condition on confounding effects from the reporting process confines the results. Endogenous, evoked internally by the unchanged stimulus ambiguity, and exogenous, evoked externally by the changes in the physical properties of the stimulus, perceptual switches could be discriminated based on the maximal amplitude of the dilation. The effect of exogenous perceptual has on the pupil were captured in a report and no-report task to detect confounding perceptual effects. In two additional studies, the moment-by-moment coupling and coupling properties of percepts between concurrent multistable processes in audition, evoked by auditory streaming, and in vision, evoked by moving plaids, were found crossmodally. In the last study, the externally induced percept in the visual multistable process was not relayed to the simultaneous auditory multistable process: Still, the observed general coupling is fragile but existent. The requirement for the investigation of a moment-by-moment coupling of the multistable perceptual processes was the application of a no-report paradigm in vision: The visual stimulus evokes an optokinetic nystagmus that has machine learnable different properties when following either of the two percepts. In combination with the manually reported auditory percept, attentional bottlenecks due to a parallel report were circumvented. The two main findings, the dilation of the pupil along reported auditory perceptual switches and the crossmodal coupling of percepts in bimodal audiovisual multistability, speak in favor of a partly global mechanism being involved in control of perceptual multistability; the global mechanism is incarcerated by the, partly independent, distributed competition of percepts on modality level. Potentially, supramodal attention-related modulations consolidate the outcome of locally distributed perceptual competition in all modalities.:COVER 1 BIBLIOGRAPHISCHE BESCHREIBUNG 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 CONTENTS 4 CHAPTER 1: Introduction 6 C1.1: Stability and uncertainty in perception 6 C1.2: Auditory, visual and audio-visual multistability 14 C1.3: Capturing the subjective perceptual experience 25 C1.4: Limitations of preceding studies, objectives, and outline of the Thesis 33 CHAPTER 2: Study 1 “Pupillometry in auditory multistability” 36 C2.1.1 Experiment 1: Introduction 36 C2.1.2 Experiment 1: Material and Methods 38 C2.1.3 Experiment 1: Data analysis 44 C2.1.4 Experiment 1: Results 48 C2.1.5 Experiment 1: Discussion 52 C2.2.1 Experiment 2: Introduction 54 C2.2.2 Experiment 2: Material and Methods 54 C2.2.3 Experiment 2: Data analysis 56 C2.2.4 Experiment 2: Results 57 C2.3 Experiment 1 & 2: Discussion 61 C2.4 Supplement Study 1 65 CHAPTER 3: Study 2 “Multimodal moment-by-moment coupling in perceptual bistability” 71 C3.1.1 Experiment 1: Introduction 71 C3.1.2 Experiment 1: Results 74 C3.1.3 Experiment 1: Discussion 80 C3.1.4 Experiment 1: Material and Methods 84 C3.1.5 Experiment 1: Data analysis 87 C3.2 Supplement Study 2 92 CHAPTER 4: Study 3 “Boundaries of bimodal coupling in perceptual bistability” 93 C4.1.1 Experiment 1: Introduction 93 C4.1.2 Experiment 1: Material and Methods 98 C4.1.3 Experiment 1: Data analysis 102 C4.1.4 Experiment 1: Results 108 C4.1.5 Experiment 1: Discussion 114 C4.2.1 Experiment 2: Introduction 116 C4.2.2 Experiment 2: Material and Methods 119 C4.2.3 Experiment 2: Data analysis 125 C4.2.4 Experiment 2: Results 133 C4.3 Experiment 1 & 2: Discussion 144 C4.4 Supplement Study 3 151 CHAPTER 5: General Discussion 154 C5.1 Significance for models of multistability and implications for the perceptual architecture 162 C5.2 Recommendations for future research 166 C5.3 Conclusion 168 REFERENCES 170 APPENDIX 186 A1: List of Figures 186 A2: List of Tables 188 A3: List of Abbreviations and Symbols 189