The Saccharomyces cerevisiae origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to replication origins at the ARS consensus sequence (ACS), serving as a scaffold for the assembly of replication complexes needed for the initiation of DNA synthesis. I generated a genome-wide map of nucleosome positions surrounding replication origins because the precise locations of nucleosomes may influence replication. My map revealed a nucleosome-free region surrounding the ACS that is bordered by two well-positioned nucleosomes. I was able to explain differences in origin properties by clustering nucleosome profiles. I found an association between the replication time and nucleosome profile for a given origin cluster. An ORC depletion mutant nucleosome map indicated a shift in nucleosomes towards the ACS. I present the first genome-wide view of origin nucleosome architecture, indicate a relationship between chromatin structure and replication timing, and suggest a model whereby the interplay between DNA sequence and ORC binding defines the nucleosome occupancy pattern.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to replication origins at the ARS consensus sequence (ACS), serving as a scaffold for the assembly of replication complexes needed for the initiation of DNA synthesis. I generated a genome-wide map of nucleosome positions surrounding replication origins because the precise locations of nucleosomes may influence replication. My map revealed a nucleosome-free region surrounding the ACS that is bordered by two well-positioned nucleosomes. I was able to explain differences in origin properties by clustering nucleosome profiles. I found an association between the replication time and nucleosome profile for a given origin cluster. An ORC depletion mutant nucleosome map indicated a shift in nucleosomes towards the ACS. I present the first genome-wide view of origin nucleosome architecture, indicate a relationship between chromatin structure and replication timing, and suggest a model whereby the interplay between DNA sequence and ORC binding defines the nucleosome occupancy pattern.

The fundamental repeating unit of all eukaryotic chromatin is the 147bp DNA:histone complex known as the nucleosome. Genome-wide studies have demonstrated that nucleosomes are organized with the 5’ promoter being nucleosome depleted and the transcribed region is occupied by a periodic array of positioned nucleosomes. While this organization is well described, the determinants, particularly trans-acting factors that contribute to this architecture are only partly described with gene expression, however, while the connection between chromatin and the various facets of gene expression regulation, especially in evolution, is apparent the detailed mechanisms remain to be described. In this thesis, I describe 1) The role of nucleosomes in gene expression evolution in closely related yeast species 2) The role of trans-acting factors (particularly transcription factors and co-factors) in determining the nucleosome depleted region of promoters and 3) The role of trans-acting factors in nucleosome spacing within genes.

The fundamental repeating unit of all eukaryotic chromatin is the 147bp DNA:histone complex known as the nucleosome. Genome-wide studies have demonstrated that nucleosomes are organized with the 5’ promoter being nucleosome depleted and the transcribed region is occupied by a periodic array of positioned nucleosomes. While this organization is well described, the determinants, particularly trans-acting factors that contribute to this architecture are only partly described with gene expression, however, while the connection between chromatin and the various facets of gene expression regulation, especially in evolution, is apparent the detailed mechanisms remain to be described. In this thesis, I describe 1) The role of nucleosomes in gene expression evolution in closely related yeast species 2) The role of trans-acting factors (particularly transcription factors and co-factors) in determining the nucleosome depleted region of promoters and 3) The role of trans-acting factors in nucleosome spacing within genes.

Chromatin is a complex of genomic DNA, RNA, and associated proteins. Many of the processes that occur on chromatin regulate the accessibility of the genetic material of a cell. The nucleosome is the basic subunit of chromatin, composed of a histone octamer wrapped with approximately 150bp of DNA. Alterations to chromatin structure, including to nucleosomes and their location, underlie global transcriptional diversity. A striking example of this is the so-called "open" chromatin state in pluripotent cells, characterized by loosely bound chromatin proteins and rapid nucleosome turnover, that allows transcriptional flexibility for subsequent differentiation. In contrast, differentiated cells contain compacted chromatin that can selectively block access to DNA and subsequent transcription. Thus, characterizing the physical state of chromatin is important to understanding its regulatory state. Digestion of chromatin with micrococcal nuclease (MNase) and subsequent sequencing of the protected DNA fragments produces a map of nucleosome occupancy. Traditional MNase mapping experiments capture a snapshot of nucleosome occupancy, providing information about nucleosomes that are accessible at the level of digestion used. We analyzed regions of difference in nucleosome occupancy between embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and differentiated cell types using traditional MNase-seq and found that differences in pluripotent and differentiated cells are punctate and correlate with regulatory regions important for pluripotency and development. Further, our analysis shows ESCs and iPSCs to be vastly more similar to each other in their chromatin structure than to the differentiated cells. We then developed a new way of collecting and analyzing MNase-seq data that allows us to determine both nucleosome occupancy as well as the accessibility of DNA to regulatory factors. Our methodology discerns distinct physical states of chromatin and provides novel insights into the accessibility of regulatory regions. Additionally, we present a quantitative metric useful for characterizing local and global regions of the genome that should be useful in future cell type comparisons.

There are a vast number of factors that influence nucleosome formation, and consequently gene regulation. These factors include histone modifications, nucleotide composition, transcriptional region elements, and specific nucleotide motifs, among others. Although the amount we know now is limited, we are creating new techniques and discoveries to assist us in continued understanding of chromatin. To make a significant contribution to the field of chromatin, I conducted two hypothesis driven sets of experiments that address the topic of chromatin structure. First, I created a technique for tissue specific nucleosome isolation with the goal of observing the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on nucleosome formation. Second, I created and tested a method to recover lost in vitro nucleosome reconstitution data, which can improve this type of data, commonly used for observing nucleosome positioning. The first experiment needs a more specific antibody to complete the last step and function as designed. The second experiment shows that our nucleosome recovery method, when applied conservatively, can recover 90% of the lost nucleosome data.

Comprendre la structure et l’organisation de la chromatine est une question fondamentale dans le domaine de la régulation de l’expression des gènes. La cristallographie par rayons-X et d’autres techniques biophysiques on permit de comprendre la structure du nucléosome avec une précision quasi atomique. Malgré de nombreuses études, les données structurelles au delà de la particule de cœur nucléosomale (NCP) demeurent imprécises. Au cours des dernières décennies plusieurs tentatives ont été faites pour montrer comment l’histone de liaison H1 interagit avec les particules nucléosomales pour les condenser en fibre de chromatine. Ces études ont mené à différents modèle décrivant la position de l’histone de liaison H1 sur la chromatine. De récentes avancées sur l’histone de liaison H1 suggèrent que le domaine globulaire de H1 (GH1) et la partie C-terminale interagit avec la dyade du nucléosome et les 2 bouts d’ADN de liaison (modèle à 3 contacts) qui sont contraintes de former une structure en tige. Cependant, la conformation et la position précise de l’histone de liaison H1 reste inconnues et la controverse à ce sujet persiste.Dans cette étude, nous avons déterminé la structure tridimensionnelle de nucléosomes contenant H1 par des techniques de cryo-microscopie électronique (cryo-EM) et de diffraction aux rayons-X dans des cristaux. Nous avons utilisé le chaperons d’histone, NAP1, pour déposer l’histone de liaison H1 sur les nucléosomes reconstitué à partir des histones de cœur recombinant et la séquence d’ADN positionnante 601 de 197 paires de bases (dite de Widom). Nos résultats de cryo-EM montrent que l’association de H1 compacte le nucléosome en réduisant la mobilité des ADNs et stabilisant ainsi les contacts entre les nucléotides précédant la sortie NCP et l’octamer d’histones. Nos résultats par diffusion de rayon-x dans des cristaux à une résolution de 7Ä montrent que la partie globulaire de H1 (GH1) est située sur la dyade et interagie simultanément avec les petits sillons de l’ADN à la dyade et les ADN de liaison à l’entrée et à la sortie du nucléosome. Les parties N- et C-terminales de H1 sont orientées vers l’extérieur du cœur du nucléosome à travers les différents ADN de liaison. Nous avons validé l’orientation de GH1 par des expériences de pontages ADN-proteine, après substitutions de cystéine par mutagénèse dirigée, empreinte par radicaux hydroxyles et « amarrage moléculaire ». Nos résultats révèlent l’effet de H1 sur la dynamique du nucléosome et apporte une vision détaillé de la conformation du « stem du nucléosome » lors de l’incorporation de H1.Nous avons également étudié l’association spécifique du facteur de transcription Sox6 à ces de reconnaissance consensus présent à l’intérieur du nucléosome, associé ou non avec l’histone de liaison H1 par une empreinte biphotonique avec laser UV. Nos résultats montrent que le domaine HMG de Sox6 se fixe spécifiquement sur son motif consensus situé profondément à l’intérieur du nucléosome à l’exception sur la dyade. Cette association n’est pas influencée par la « fermeture » des ADN de liaison avec l’histone H1 démontrant l’existence d’un autre façon de reconnaissance que le modèle de Widom basés sur fluctuations thermodynamiques des ADN de liaison. Le résultat que Sox6 est capable de surmonter la barrière nucléosomale (avec ou sans H1) suggère fortement que les facteurs de transcription de la famille Sox, de domaine de liaison de type HMG, jouent le rôle de facteurs « pionnier » dans la régulation de la transcription et en particulier dans l’initiation de la différentiation. / Understanding the structural organization of chromatin is a fundamental issue in the field of gene regulation. X-ray crystallography and other biophysical techniques have enabled understanding of the nucleosome structure nearly at atomic precision. Despite numerous studies, the structural information beyond the nucleosome core particle (NCP) remains elusive. Over the last few decades several attempts have been made to reveal how the linker histone H1 interacts with the nucleosome particles and condenses them into a chromatin fiber. These studies have led to different models describing the position of linker histone H1 on chromatin. Recent advancements in linker histone H1 studies suggest that globular domain of histone H1 (GH1) interacts with the nucleosomal dyad and its C-terminal domain interacts with the linker DNA forming a stem like structure. However, the precise conformation of linker histone H1 and position of other domains still remains unknown.In this study, we resolved the three-dimensional structure of H1-containing nucleosomes by using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography. We have used the chaperone NAP-1 to deposit linker histone H1 onto nucleosomes reconstituted from recombinant core histones and 197 base-pair of 601 strong nucleosome positioning DNA sequence. Our cryo-EM results showed that association of H1 gives a more compact appearance of the nucleosome as it restricts the mobility of the two linker DNAs keeping them in close proximity and thereby stabilizing contacts between the histone core and nucleotides preceding NCP exit. Our X-ray crystallography results at 7 Ä resolution reveal that the globular domain of histone H1 (GH1) is positioned onto the nucleosome pseudodyad and recognizes the nucleosome core and both linker arms by contacting the DNA backbone in the minor groove. The N- and C-terminal domains of H1 are oriented away from the nucleosome core towards different DNA linkers. We further validated the orientation of GH1 by cross-linking experiments followed after cysteine substitutions mutagenesis, hydroxyl radical footprinting and by molecular docking. Our results reveal the effect of H1 on nucleosome dynamics and also provide a detailed view of the nucleosome stem conformation upon H1 incorporation.We also studyed the nucleosome accessibility of transcription factor Sox6 and the impact of linker histone H1 incorporation to Sox6 binding on nucleosome by using UV laser biphotonic footprinting. Our results reveal that Sox6 HMG domain binds specifically to its consensus binding located deep inside of the nucleosomal DNA, but not at the nucleosomal dyad. Our in vitro footprinting results reveal that the “locking” of DNA linkers by incorporation of histone H1 on nucleosome does not show any impact on Sox6 HMG domain binding, evidencing an alternative to the Widom model based on thermal fluctuation “opening” of the nucleosome at the linkers.. The finding that Sox6 is able to overcome nucleosome (chromatosome) barrier in presence or absence of H1, strongly suggest that the HMG domain - based Sox family proteins it can act as a pioneer factor in transcription regulation, in particular in initiation of cell differentiation.

Several factors direct the placement of specific nucleosomes, which in turn have the ability to regulate DNA accessibility. These factors include, but are not limited to, nucleotide sequence preference, nucleotide modifications, the type of histones present within the nucleosome, and the presence of additional transcription factor or chromatin remodelers. A combination of these and other factors are responsible for tightly controlled efficient transcription within the eukaryotic cell. In order to contribute to the understanding of these complicated processes, three separate hypothesis-driven investigations were carried out. First, we looked into nucleosome positioning and phasing within closely related cells lines. Second, we examined domain level nucleosome occupancy on various portions of the chromosome. Finally, we generated a novel method that significantly reduces data loss in in vitro nucleosome reconstitution experiments caused by nucleosome fragment-end bias. All three of our investigations yielded separate results. First, by examining positions and phasing patterns within similar cell types we find common patterns and minor differences within similar cell types. The presence of minor differences in nucleosome positions may cause unique expression patterns. Secondly, we found that decreased domain level nucleosome occupancy at the chromosome arms is not caused by the presence of a class of nucleosomes, termed fragile nucleosomes. Finally, we found that when our nucleosome recovery method is applied conservatively to our dataset, it is possible to recover 80% of the lost nucleosome reconstitution data.

As a centromere-specific protein complex in direct contact with the DNA, CenH3-containing nucleosomes are generally thought to act as the distinguishing epigenetic mark of active centromere location. Confusingly, seemingly disparate models have been proposed for the structure of CenH3 nucleosomes. The most widely supported model is an octameric structure that, like histone H3 nucleosomes, contains two subunits of each histone. Another more contentious, yet persistent model is the hemisome model proposed for fly and human CenH3 nucleosomes. In this case it is suggested that CenH3 nucleosomes contain only single subunit of each histone. One reason for this lack of consensus is that seemingly contradicting models are often proposed, even with material from the same organism, with little overlap in experimental approaches. For example, the proposed hemisome model for fly and human CenH3 nucleosomes is predominantly based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging where the height of nucleosomes on a surface is measured. These AFM measurements are the main data used by protagonists for the hemisome model. However, data supporting an octameric model for human, and other, CenH3 nucleosomes is largely based on biochemical analysis of nucleosomes prepared in vitro, with little cross-over in the methodology used to generate data to support either model. In order to reach a consensus the same analyses needs to be applied to CenH3 nucleosomes assembled in vitro or extracted from cells. Here, recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe CENP-ACnp1 and H3 histones expressed and purified from E. coli have been assembled into nucleosomes. To our knowledge this is the first time that recombinant S. pombe nucleosomes have been produced, allowing the stoichiometry and composition of these nucleosomes to be examined in detail by a variety of biochemical and biophysical assays. The application of AFM has enabled the height of these recombinant nucleosomes to be measured and tests the ability of AFM to infer stoichiometry using defined material. The intriguing conclusion is that octameric CenH3 nucleosomes uniquely behave as tetrameric “hemisomes” as defined by AFM. In recent years the contribution of DNA sequence to directing H3 nucleosome location has received a great deal of interest. Since CENP-ACnp1 nucleosomes wrap DNA differently to H3 nucleosomes their preference for sequences that produce a stable nucleosome is expected to be altered. The development of protocols to assemble recombinant CENP-ACnp1 nucleosomes in vitro has also been used here to assess the contribution of primary DNA sequence to CENP-ACnp1 nucleosome positioning. CENP-ACnp1 and H3 nucleosomes were reconstituted on genomic DNA at low density and the resulting nucleosomal DNA from CENP-ACnp1 and H3 particles compared by Illumina sequencing. The stability of CENP-ACnp1 and H3 nucleosomes on specific ‘H3’ and ‘CENP-ACnp1’ sequences was cross-checked. Comparing these data with in vivo CENP-ACnp1 nucleosome positions has allowed the contribution of primary DNA sequence to CENP-ACnp1 nucleosome positioning to be explored.

Chromatin remodelers are ATP-dependent multisubunit assemblies that regulate transcription and other processes by altering DNA-histone contacts. The mechanism of action is based on the transduction of energy released by ATP hydrolysis to translocation on DNA and ultimately the movement of histones in cis or trans. Though the critical ATP burning and translocation activities are fulfilled by a conserved ATPase domain in the catalytic subunit, there are accessory domains and subunits that are speculated to regulate these activities. Important questions in the field center around the identification of these domains and subunits, whether they affect complex formation, substrate affinity or a critical step in remodeling. If they do affect remodeling, what is the structural basis of the regulatory activity. In this study, these questions have been addressed using the prototype remodeler SWI/SNF from budding yeast. ySWI/SNF is a 12 subunit complex that includes the catalytic subunit Swi2/Snf2. It affects 6% of the yeast genome being primarily involved in gene activation. We employed a systematic protein or domain deletion strategy and characterized the mutant complexes in vitro and in vivo. A key finding was that SWI/SNF is organized in distinct structural modules and that the Snf2 module regulates most of its activities. Snf2 is a central subunit in this module and the function of conserved regions within Snf2 were studied. The N terminus preceding the HSA and ATPase domain has three major roles - complex assembly, recruitment and regulation of catalytic activity. A novel SnAC domain located C terminal to ATPase domain was identified to play critical role in coupling ATP hydrolysis to nucleosome movement by acting as a histone anchor. Finally the tandem AT-hooks between SnAC and bromodomain serve as DNA binding domains but also affect ATPase activity and nucleosome mobilization independent of its binding activity. Taken together, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the function of regulatory domains in SWI/SNF.