This Thesis aims to explore how the opening of offshore wind power development blocks in Norway results in conflicts between fishermen and the offshore wind industry. The goal is to identify synergies between the two maritime sectors which may be used in future consultation phases. The Thesis includes qualitative research that was compiled by document analysis and triangulated by examining and interpreting data found within the literature review, hearing responses, interviews, and public letters. The results unveil that conflict inducing factors in Norway are similar to international cases. These factors include concerns for noise under construction and operation, the loss of acreage/livelihood, the lack of knowledge, and the disregard for fishermen’s concerns.  It was found that offshore wind could lead to more sustainable fishing practices and give way to aquaculture activity. Wind farms may serve as a safe haven for juvenile marine species and increase biodiversity by the creation of artificial reefs on foundation structures. An in-situ demonstration of these effects was suggested to increase knowledge and facilitate coexistence. A willingness from both parties to come to a solution was identified and it was suggested to employ an objective mediator in future consultations/negotiations. Finally, it was suggested to deploy offshore wind farther from land, and to offset the cost of increased depth by increasing the capacity of projects.