When examining objects using tactile senses, individuals often incorporate multiple sources of haptic sensory information to estimate the object’s properties. How do our brains integrate various cues to form a single percept of the object? Previous research has indicated that integration from cues across sensory modalities is optimally achieved by weighting each cue according to its variance, such that more reliable cues have more weight in determining the percept. To explore this question in the context of a within-modality haptic setting, we assessed participants’ perception of edges that cross the index, middle, and ring fingers of the right hand. We used a 2-interval forced choice (2IFC) task to measure the acuity of each digit individually, as well as the acuity of all three digits working together, by asking participants to distinguish the locations of two closely spaced plastic edges. In examining the data, we considered three perceptual models, an optimal (Bayesian) model, an unweighted average model, and a winner-take-all model. The results indicate that participants perceived sub-optimally, such that the acuity of the three digits together did not exceed that of the best individual digit. We further investigated our question by having participants unknowingly undergo a 2IFC cue conflict condition, where they thought they were touching a straight edge which was actually staggered and thus gave each digit a different positional cue. Our analyses indicate that participants did not undertake optimal cue combination but are inconclusive with respect to which suboptimal strategy they employed. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / This thesis investigates the neural mechanisms behind tactile perception, specifically how the brain combines multiple sensory cues to construct a unified percept when interacting with objects through touch. Typically, optimal sensory integration involves assigning more weight to more reliable cues. Our research focused on tactile integration by examining participants’ ability to perceive the positions of edges crossing their index, middle, and ring fingers simultaneously. The results indicated that, contrary to predictions, participants exhibited various sub-optimal cue integration strategies. Their ability to perceive the combined positions of all three fingers was not superior to that of the best-performing individual finger. We also explored cue conflict situations, where the locations of the tactile cues were no longer from a straight edge, unbeknown to participants, and the results here reinforced the finding that participants did not consistently employ optimal cue combination strategies. This research offers valuable insights into how the brain processes tactile information.