Thesis (M.Sc.) -- Memorial University of Newfoundland. / Bibliography : leaves 266-277. Also available online.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland. / Bibliography : leaves 291-305. Also available online.

Thesis (Ph.D.(Materials Science & Metallurgical Engineering))--University of Pretoria, 2009. / Abstract in English. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Queensland, 2003. / Includes bibliography.

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Queensland, 2004. / Includes bibliography.

Thesis (M. Sc.)(Chemistry)--University of Pretoria, 2003. / Title from opening screen (viewed March 22, 2006). Summaries in English and Afrikaans. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M. Sc.)(Geology)--University of Pretoria, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references. Available on the Internet via the World Wide Web.

Sampling is an error generating process and these errors should be reduced to a minimum if an accurate ore reserve estimation is to be made from the sample values. Error in sampling can arise from the sampling procedure as well as where and how each sample is taken from the deposit . Sampling procedure involves sample collection, sample reduction and analysis, and the error from each of these three stages has an equal influence on the total error of the process. Error due to sampling procedure should be identified and eliminated at an early stage in the evaluation programme. An ore deposit should be subdivided into sampling strata along geological boundaries, and once these boundaries have been established they should be adhered to for the evaluation programme. The sampling of each stratum depends on the small-scale structures in which the grade is distributed, and this distribution in relation to sample size controls sample variance, sample bias and the volume of influence of each sample. Cluster sampling can be used where an impractically large sample is necessary to reduce sample variance or increase the volume of influence of samples. Sample bias can be reduced by composing a large number of small samples . Sampling patterns should be designed with reference to the volumes of influence of samples, and in favourable geology, geostatistical or statistical techniques can be used to predict the precision of an ore reserve estimation 1n terms of the number of samples taken. Different are deposits have different sampling characteristics and problems which can be directly related to the geology of the mineralization. If geology is disregarded when sampling an are deposit, an evaluation programme cannot claim to give an accurate estimate of the ore reserves .

Candelaria, situated in central western Nevada, along the western margin of the Great Basin, is a large and predominantly low grade, epigenetic disseminated- and vein-type Ag deposit, of Early Cretaceous age. It represents the eroded, deeply oxidised and fault-disrupted root of extensive stratiform quartz-dolomite stockworked and sericite-dolomite-altered zones of medium temperature pyrite-dominated Ag(-Pb-Zn-Sb-As±Cu±Au) sulphide-sulphosalt mineralisation, which is hosted by receptive sedimentary and igneous rocks within structurally favourable zones in a district-scale tectonic pinchout, and which is genetically associated with Cordilleran granodiorite porphyry hypabyssal magmatism (diking), of high K calc-alkaline affinity. The mineralisation occurs along and directly beneath the Pickhandle allochthon, a serpentinite-sheathed volcanic-sedimentary tectonic méange which forms a local 'sole' plate to the regionally extensive Golconda allochthon, which was emplaced onto the edge of continental North America during the Early Triassic Sonoma orogeny. Mineralisation occurred where an irregularity in the Pickhandle thrust plane, caused by thickening of the méange, effected locally deeper truncation of the parautochthonous foreland sequence in its footwall - chiefly marine sediments of the Lower Triassic Candelaria Formation - against the deformed cherts of the Ordovician basement (Palmetto complex), to form a structural trap. Within this trap, mineralisation is hosted mainly by carbonaceous, carbonate- and phosphate-rich (and trace metal-rich) black shales at the base of the Candelaria Formation and by dolomite-quartz-altered serpentinites at the base of the Pickhandle allochthon. Stable isotope data (O, H, S) point to a predominantly magmatic source for the hydrothermal fluids and ore sulphur, a source most likely to be the parent pluton to the granodiorite porphyry dikes. More ore metals were also of igneous origin (mass balance calculations rule out Candelaria member 1 as the chief metal source).

Thesis (MTech (Chemical Engineering))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2016. / Nickel, a valuable base metal, is the predominant product from the Nkomati mine in South Africa. High-grade nickel mineral ores (2%) from the Massive Sulphide Body have been depleted leaving those of low grade (0.3%). The beneficiation of this ore presents a challenge to the minerals processing industry. In response, batch froth flotation tests were used to explore the effects of mixtures of potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) and IPETC (Isopropyl ethyl thionocarbamate) on the grades and recoveries of nickel. In the mixtures, the xanthate accounted for 95.5, 90, 85 and 80 mole% respectively. Generally an increase in the nickel grade and recovery was observed with the mixtures relative to PAX. IPETC gave a significant increase in the cumulative water recovery with a significant decrease in cumulative nickel grade relative to PAX. PAX gave the highest cumulative nickel grade for the singular collector tests (1.9%), while obtaining the lowest cumulative recovery (77%). Out of the collector mixtures, mixtures 85% PAX: 15% IPETC and 90% PAX: 10% IPETC produced the joint highest cumulative grades (1.8%). These mixtures both gave recoveries of 82%. Collector mixture 95.5% PAX: 4.5% IPETC gave the second highest grade (1.7%) and the highest nickel recovery (85%). Although there were differences in the cumulative nickel grades and recoveries there were statistically no significant improvements observed with the use of the mixtures of PAX and IPETC in comparison to the industry mixture (95.5% SIBX: 4.5% IPETC). Tests were performed using the three best performing collector mixtures at molar dosages of 1.3, 0.65 and 0.325mmol/t. The highest cumulative nickel grades were obtained at the lowest collector dosages (at a molar dosage of 0.325mmol/t of 95.5% SIBX: 4.5% IPETC) with collector mixture 95.5% PAX: 4.5% IPETC being the most selective with a nickel grade of 2%. It was also observed that an increase in collector dosage, generally increased the cumulative nickel recovery with collector mixture 95.5% PAX: 4.5% IPETC at a molar dosage of 1.3mmol/t gave the highest cumulative recovery out of the tested mixtures (85%). The study also indicated that an increase in selectivity (i.e. cumulative grade) was at the expense of cumulative recovery. With a decrease in dosage, there was no significant improvement in the cumulative nickel grade and recovery for the tested mixtures compared to the industry mixture. There was however a significant decrease in the water recoveries achieved with PAX and collector mixtures 95.5% PAX: 4.5% IPETC at a molar dosage of 1.3mmolg/t of as well as mixture 90% PAX: 10% IPETC at a molar dosage of 0.65mmol/t.