摘要 臺北市政府順應世界潮流，推動公共事務委外，為達成撙節人力與預算支出，於民國八十九年率先將公園附設游泳池委託民間經營管理。然民國九十六年卻發生承包商中途歇業、游泳池關門以及新的標案無廠商投標的現象。 本研究主要目的在探討臺北市公園附設游泳池委託經營所面臨的問題，並就經營困境提供改善方案建議。本文應用之理論為公共選擇理論、交易成本理論、代理理論和公私協力理論，採用文獻分析法、深度訪談法及參與觀察法，探索臺北市政府轄管之公園附設游泳池經營管理之最佳模式。 經研究分析發現管理機關未嚴格依契約執行、未建立退場機制、低使用率之游泳池競爭力薄弱、法令限制多、游泳池缺乏活化以及未妥做政策之可行性評估等因素為之前委外經營失敗之原因。 經歸納後提出下列建議：(1)契約訂定要嚴謹並嚴格要求應依契約執行；(2)要建立退場機制；(3)加強監督以提高服務品質；(4)主管機關法令定位要明確；(5)審慎評估將使用率低的游泳池關閉或轉型；(6)確實做好可行性評估和先期規劃；(7)建置彈性的招商機制與強化自主的履約管理；(8)利用既有優勢，提高競爭力；(9)將使用率高有競爭力的游泳池優先更新；(10)應確實檢討委託經營政策；(11)加強教育訓練，提升專業能力；(12)應確實做好市場調查。 / Abstract Following the global trend of promoting the outsourcing of public affairs in order to reduce human resources and budget expenditure, Taipei City Government has contracted out park swimming pools since 2000. Then it happened that the contractor went out of business halfway and closed the swimming pools in 2007. Furthermore, no new tenders bided for the successive contract. This study aims to investigate problems of by contracting out Taipei City Government park swimming pools, to provide proposals to mitigate difficulties in outsourcing business operation and to explore the best mode of park swimming pools management. The theories used in this thesis include Public Choice Theory, Transaction Cost Theory, Agency Theory and Public-Private Partnership Theory. Study methods used include document analysis, in-depth interviews and participant observation. The study found that the followings are causes of failure in the previous outsourcing project: the administrative authority did not enforce strict accordance with the contract, exit mechanism was not established, some low-usage swimming pools were less competitive, there were too many legal restrictions, swimming pools activation was not sufficient and feasibility study of outsourcing policy was not well performed. The following recommendations are summarized: (1) Rigorous contract terms and strict execution in accordance with the contract; (2) Establishing exit mechanism; (3) Strengthening supervision in order to improve service quality; (4) Establishing clear regulations; (5) Closing or transforming low-usage swimming pools; (6) Well-performed feasibility assessment and preliminary planning; (7) Building flexible outsourcing mechanism and strengthening self-compliance management; (8) Improving competitiveness by using the existing strengths; (9) Renovating competitive high-usage swimming pools as top priority; (10) Reviewing outsourcing policies exactly; (11) Strengthening education and training to enhance professional skills; (12) Well-performed market research.