Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ovulationinduction factor"" "subject:"ovulationsinduktions factor""
1 |
Interspecies comparison of the effect of ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in seminal plasmaBogle, Orleigh Addelecia 14 September 2009
The purpose of the studies reported in this thesis was to provide further evidence in support of the hypothesis that ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) is a component of seminal plasma which is conserved amongst mammals. Based on studies conducted in vivo, the results indicate that males ejaculate a substance during copulation which is responsible for the ovulatory and luteotrophic effect in female camelids. In our lab we have developed an <i>in vivo</i> llama bioassay to study the presence and biological effects of OIF in seminal plasma from different species.<p>
The objective of the first experiment within the first study was to determine if llama seminal plasma would stimulate ovulation in prepubertal mice. Mice were treated with a single 0.1 mL intraperitoneal dose of 1) phosphate-buffered saline (negative control), 2) 5 µg gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), 3) 5 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or 4) llama seminal plasma. Results indicate that prepubertal mice treated with GnRH, hCG or llama seminal plasma stimulated similar proportions of mice to ovulate, which were all higher than the proportion of mice that ovulated after saline treatment. The number of oocytes observed under a stereomicroscope was also higher in all treatment groups than in mice treated with saline. However, the number of oocytes observed was lower in mice treated with seminal plasma than those treated with GnRH, both of which were similar to the number of oocytes observed in hCG treated mice.<p>
In a second part of this study the corollary that OIF is present in the seminal plasma of horses and pigs was examined. Seminal plasma from horses or pigs was administered intramuscularly to female llamas and ovulation was monitored using transrectal ultrasonography. Llamas were treated with an intramuscular dose of 1) phosphate buffered saline (negative control), 2) llama seminal plasma (positive control), 3) equine seminal plasma or 4) porcine seminal plasma. Ovulations were detected in llamas treated with seminal plasma while none were observed in saline-treated llamas. The proportion of llamas that ovulated when treated with equine seminal plasma was higher than llamas treated with saline. The proportion of llamas that ovulated after porcine seminal plasma tended to differ from negative control groups, but did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of llamas that ovulated after equine or porcine seminal plasma treatment was lower than animals treated with llama seminal plasma which indicates that either OIF is not present in equal concentration among mammals, or that OIF is not structurally the same across mammals.<p>
The second study was carried out to test the hypothesis that OIF stimulates LH secretion at the level of the anterior pituitary gland. The second objective was to determine if the degree of LH release was related to the dose of OIF treatment. Anterior pituitary cells (2 x 10^6 cells/ well) from either llamas (reflex ovulator) or cattle (spontaneous ovulator) were incubated for 2 hours with either media containing no treatment (control), GnRH or OIF. In all experiments, GnRH and OIF stimulated more LH secretion than control groups. An effect of dose was evident in the llama pituitary cell culture where mean LH concentrations were greater in wells treated with a higher dose of OIF in comparison to wells treated with a lower dose, both of which were higher than in wells with no treatment. Although OIF stimulated LH release in bovine cell cultures, an apparent dose response was not detected. Results indicate that the preovulatory LH surge observed after OIF treatment in camelids may be the result of OIF directly stimulating LH release from gonadotrope cells within the anterior pituitary gland.
In conclusion these results illustrate that the presence and the response to OIF is conserved among species that share no relation or common reproductive strategy.
|
2 |
Interspecies comparison of the effect of ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in seminal plasmaBogle, Orleigh Addelecia 14 September 2009 (has links)
The purpose of the studies reported in this thesis was to provide further evidence in support of the hypothesis that ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) is a component of seminal plasma which is conserved amongst mammals. Based on studies conducted in vivo, the results indicate that males ejaculate a substance during copulation which is responsible for the ovulatory and luteotrophic effect in female camelids. In our lab we have developed an <i>in vivo</i> llama bioassay to study the presence and biological effects of OIF in seminal plasma from different species.<p>
The objective of the first experiment within the first study was to determine if llama seminal plasma would stimulate ovulation in prepubertal mice. Mice were treated with a single 0.1 mL intraperitoneal dose of 1) phosphate-buffered saline (negative control), 2) 5 µg gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), 3) 5 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or 4) llama seminal plasma. Results indicate that prepubertal mice treated with GnRH, hCG or llama seminal plasma stimulated similar proportions of mice to ovulate, which were all higher than the proportion of mice that ovulated after saline treatment. The number of oocytes observed under a stereomicroscope was also higher in all treatment groups than in mice treated with saline. However, the number of oocytes observed was lower in mice treated with seminal plasma than those treated with GnRH, both of which were similar to the number of oocytes observed in hCG treated mice.<p>
In a second part of this study the corollary that OIF is present in the seminal plasma of horses and pigs was examined. Seminal plasma from horses or pigs was administered intramuscularly to female llamas and ovulation was monitored using transrectal ultrasonography. Llamas were treated with an intramuscular dose of 1) phosphate buffered saline (negative control), 2) llama seminal plasma (positive control), 3) equine seminal plasma or 4) porcine seminal plasma. Ovulations were detected in llamas treated with seminal plasma while none were observed in saline-treated llamas. The proportion of llamas that ovulated when treated with equine seminal plasma was higher than llamas treated with saline. The proportion of llamas that ovulated after porcine seminal plasma tended to differ from negative control groups, but did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of llamas that ovulated after equine or porcine seminal plasma treatment was lower than animals treated with llama seminal plasma which indicates that either OIF is not present in equal concentration among mammals, or that OIF is not structurally the same across mammals.<p>
The second study was carried out to test the hypothesis that OIF stimulates LH secretion at the level of the anterior pituitary gland. The second objective was to determine if the degree of LH release was related to the dose of OIF treatment. Anterior pituitary cells (2 x 10^6 cells/ well) from either llamas (reflex ovulator) or cattle (spontaneous ovulator) were incubated for 2 hours with either media containing no treatment (control), GnRH or OIF. In all experiments, GnRH and OIF stimulated more LH secretion than control groups. An effect of dose was evident in the llama pituitary cell culture where mean LH concentrations were greater in wells treated with a higher dose of OIF in comparison to wells treated with a lower dose, both of which were higher than in wells with no treatment. Although OIF stimulated LH release in bovine cell cultures, an apparent dose response was not detected. Results indicate that the preovulatory LH surge observed after OIF treatment in camelids may be the result of OIF directly stimulating LH release from gonadotrope cells within the anterior pituitary gland.
In conclusion these results illustrate that the presence and the response to OIF is conserved among species that share no relation or common reproductive strategy.
|
3 |
Ovulation-inducing factor/nerve growth factor (OIF/NGF) : Immunohistochemical studies of the bovine ovary and the llama hypothalamus2016 January 1900 (has links)
The overall objective was to elucidate the mechanism of action of ovulation-inducing factor/nerve growth factor (OIF/NGF) in the reproductive function of spontaneous and induced ovulators, using cow and llama as models.
In Study 1, the dynamics of trkA, the high affinity receptor for OIF/NGF, were studied during periovulatory period in cows. Unilateral ovariectomies were performed by colpotomy on Days 2, 4 and 6 of the estrous cycle (Day 0= ovulation), and before and after LH administration. Ovarian samples were processed for immunofluorescent detection of trkA. The intensity and area of immuno-positive staining, and the proportion of immuno-positive cells in both the granulosa and theca layers were higher in dominant than in subordinate follicles (P<0.05). Dominant follicles displayed a different intracellular distribution of trkA from subordinate follicles. The number of positive cells was higher in the developing CL (Day 2 and 4) than in the mature or regressing CL (Day 6, Pre-LH, and Post-LH).
In Study 2, the distribution of GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus was examined in female llamas (n = 4). Hypothalamic samples were processed for immunohistochemistry for GnRH. The distribution of GnRH neurons had no evident accumulation in specific hypothalamic nuclei. The majority of GnRH neurons were detected in the anterior and medio-basal hypothalamus (P<0.05). The GnRH neuron fibers were detected primarily in the median eminence and in the medio-basal hypothalamus.
In Study 3, the relationship between trkA and GnRH neurons in the llama diencephalon was examined in llama brains (n = 4) obtained in Study 2. Samples were stained using double immunofluorescence. TrkA immuno-reactivity was present in most hypothalamic areas examined; the highest density was found in the diagonal band of Broca and the periventricular nuclei. A low percentage of GnRH cells (1%) showed immuno-reactivity to trkA. Close association between immuno-reactive cells (i.e., GnRH and trkA in the same microscopic field) was detected rarely (3/160 GnRH neurons).
We concluded that: 1) the high affinity receptor for OIF/NGF is expressed in greater quantities in dominant than subordinate follicles and in the developing CL; 2) GnRH neurons of llamas are concentrated in the anterior and middle hypothalamus, in close relationship to the third ventricle; and, 3) expression of trkA receptors on GnRH neurons was rare, suggesting that the ovulatory effect of OIF/NGF is not via direct interaction with GnRH neurons.
|
4 |
Nerve growth factor: its role in male fertility as an ovulation inducer2016 December 1900 (has links)
The studies presented in this thesis were designed to elucidate whether the abundance of ovulation-inducing factor/nerve growth factor (OIF/NGF) in alpaca semen can be used as a biomarker to predict male fertility. The neurotrophin, OIF/NGF has been identified in camelid, cattle and human semen. It is only in camelids, however, that an ovulation-inducing role for OIF/NGF has been described. The information gathered from several studies clearly demonstrate that this protein is the stimulus responsible for initiating the ovulatory cascade in camelids. In addition, intramuscular administration of OIF/NGF resulted in a dose-dependent response in terms of ovulation rate, corpus luteum (CL) lifespan, luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone secretion. I hypothesized that the quantity of OIF/NGF differs among male alpacas and this abundance arbitrates ovulation and pregnancy rates as well as CL formation and function. To substantiate this hypothesis, the following questions were answered: 1) can OIF/NGF in alpaca semen be quantified using a radioimmunoassay; 2) does the concentration and total abundance of OIF/NGF in alpaca semen vary within and among male ejaculates; 3) what is the glandular source of OIF/NGF that contributes to the male ejaculate; 4) is OIF/NGF concentration or abundance related to parameters associated with male fertility; 5) can OIF/NGF concentration or total abundance in the ejaculate discriminate fertile and subfertile males using both retrospective and prospective approaches; and 6) can power Doppler ultrasonography be used to assess the luteotrophic effect of OIF/NGF in tissue vasculature of the developing CL? I discovered that the source and the amount of OIF/NGF varies among species. In llamas, OIF/NGF is produced by both the corpus and disseminate portions of the prostate gland. In rats, OIF/NGF was detected in testis interstitial cells and in the lumen of the coagulating gland (anterior prostate). Ovulation-inducing factor/NGF secretion by the ampullae and vesicular glands contributed to its presence in bull (cattle and bison) ejaculates. In elk and white tail deer, OIF/NGF was detected in the ampullae and prostate glands, respectively. To gain an understanding of the abundance of OIF/NGF in ejaculates and changes in its concentration within and among males, OIF/NGF levels in semen were quantified using the radioimmunoassay. The assay developed exhibited parallel displacement curves among recombinant NGF, OIF/NGF purified from llama seminal plasma, llama and bull (cattle) seminal plasma. Ovulation-inducing factor/NGF comprised a greater percentage of the total protein found in camelid ejaculates than in cattle. Ovulation-inducing factor/NGF concentration correlated positively with sperm concentration and negatively with pH and semen volume, while total abundance of OIF/NGF was related to total prostate area and OIF/NGF concentration. Although a correlation was found between sperm concentration, neither OIF/NGF concentration nor total abundance was associated with higher ovulation, pregnancy or live birth rates. A clear association of the quantity of OIF/NGF in the male ejaculate at breeding and CL form and function was not evident. The measurement of CL vasculature by power Doppler ultrasonography, however, was able to determine nonpregnancy in alpacas earlier than the assessment of changes in CL diameter. In summary, my results did not support the hypothesis that the measurement of OIF/NGF concentration or total abundance in alpaca semen can be used to predict fertility in male alpacas.
|
Page generated in 0.2565 seconds