Enteric fever caused by Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A are a major public health concern in Kathmandu. The aim of this thesis was to identify and assess the population most at risk by investigating epidemiologic trends of enteric fever within a subset population of Kathmandu. Therefore,the burden and incidence of enteric fever within the study population and the seasonal and gender distribution of enteric fever was assessed. Considerable burden of enteric fever, unrelated to population density, correlating with the seasonal fluctuations in rainfall was observed. This thesis also aimed to improve the understanding of enteric fever transmission by identifying probable transmission routes,hence various water and food samples were analysed and the extent of faecal contamination in them was determined. S. Typhi isolates were sequenced and genotyped and combined with GPS data to longitudinally study the local distribution and infer transmission of this human restricted bacterial pathogen. Extensive clustering of typhoid independent of population size and density and existence of an extensive range of genotypes within typhoid clusters including individual households with multiple cases was observed. These observations predict that indirect transmission had an overwhelming contribution for disease persistence, potentially through contaminated water. Consistent with this hypothesis, S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A were detected in water supplies and it was observed that typhoid was spatially associated with public water sources and low elevation. A concurrent case-control study was also conducted which allowed for the determination of risk factors in the population at risk. These studies imply that resources should be allocated toward controlling the most important vectors of enteric fever, including food sold by vendors, chlorination of drinking water, construction of proper water distribution and sewage networks,vaccination campaigns and hygiene education.

I performed two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the best treatments for enteric fever in Kathmandu, Nepal, an area with a high proportion of nalidixic acid resistant S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A isolates. I recruited 844 patients with suspected enteric fever to compare chloramphenicol versus gatifloxacin. 352 patients were culture confirmed. 14/175 patients treated with chloramphenicol and 12/177 patients treated with gatifloxacin experienced treatment failure (HR=0.86 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.86), p=0.70). The median times to fever clearance were 3.95 and 3.90 days, respectively (HR=1.06 [CI 0.86 to 1.32], p=0.59). The second RCT compared ofloxacin versus gatifloxacin and recruited 627 patients. Of the 170 patients infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, the number of patients with treatment failure was 6/83 in the ofloxacin group and 5/87 in the gatifloxacin group (Hazard Ratio, HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.65; p=0.73); the median times to fever clearance were 4.7 and 3.3 days respectively (HR=1.59 [CI 1.16 to 2.18], p=0.004). I compared conventional blood culture against an electricity free culture approach. 66 of 304 patients with suspected enteric fever were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A, 55 (85%) isolates were identified by the conventional blood culture and 60 (92%) isolates were identified by the experimental method. The percentages of positive and negative agreement for diagnosis of enteric fever were 90.9% and 96.0%, respectively. This electricity free blood culture system may have utility in resource-limited settings or potentially in disaster relief and refugee camps. I performed a literature review of RCTs of enteric fever which showed that trial design varied greatly. I was interested in the perspective of patients and what they regarded as cure. 1,481 patients were interviewed at the start of treatment, 860 (58%) reported that the resolution of fever would mean cure to them. At the completion of treatment, 877/1,448 (60.6%) reported that they felt cured when fever was completely gone. We suggest that fever clearance time is the best surrogate for clinical cure in patients with enteric fever and should be used as the primary outcome in future RCTs for the treatment of enteric fever.