• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

An experimental investigation of some parameters affecting individual differences in perception /

Nettelbeck, Theodore John. January 1973 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Psychology, 1974.
2

A historical-critical review of subliminal communication and its relationship to the field of speech-communication /

Shehorn, Michael Lee. January 1976 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.A.)--Eastern Illinois University. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 95-101).
3

Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects

Zippenfennig, Claudio, Niklaus, Laura, Karger, Katrin, Milani, Thomas L.. 12 December 2018 (has links)
Objective Deterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that subliminal electrical and mechanical noise applied to the sole of the foot of healthy elderly subjects improves vibration perception thresholds (VPT). Methods VPTs of 99 healthy elderly subjects were measured at 30 Hz at the heel and first metatarsal head (MET I). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: vibration (Vi-G), current (Cu-G), control (Co-G), placebo-vibration (Pl-Vi), and placebo-current (Pl-Cu). Vi-G and Cu-G were stimulated using 90% (subliminal) of their individual perception thresholds for five minutes in a standing position. Co-G received no stimulation. The placebo groups were treated with mock stimulation. VPTs were measured twice before the intervention (baseline (BASE) and pre-measurement (PRE)), and once after the intervention (post-measurement (POST)). Results Significant differences were found between measurement conditions comparing BASE and POST, and PRE and POST. VPTs between groups within each measurement condition showed no significant differences. Vi-G was the only group that showed significantly higher VPTs in POST compared to BASE and PRE, which contradicts previous studies. Conclusion We analyzed increased VPTs after subliminal mechanical stimulation. The pressure load of standing for five minutes combined with subliminal stimulation may have shifted the initial level of mechanoreceptor sensitivity, which may lead to a deterioration of the VPT. The subliminal electrical stimulation had no effect on VPT. Significance Based on our results, we cannot confirm positive effects of subliminal electrical or mechanical stimulation on the sole of the foot.

Page generated in 0.1189 seconds