This commentary to Pindar's Nemean 6 was inspired as much by the absence of recent modern criticism as by the presence of those venerable works on the Nemean odes by Fennell, Bury and Farnell. I determined to examine these commentaries in particular since they are basic to any critical approach. I next determined to include more contemporary criticism which was either directed to the Nemean 6 in particular, or was generally applicable. I was guided in my selection of points of interest as much by personal curiosity as by a sense of their poetic, thematic, structural, syntactical, or textual importance. In the interest of private safety as well as sanity, I have avoided any analysis of metre, except where it has been utterly unavoidable.

Diss. / Includes bibliographical references.

Inaug.-Diss.--Strassburg. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Johns Hopkins University, 1897. / "Literature": p. vii.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Johns Hopkins University, 1897. / "Literature": p. vii.

Inaug.-Diss.--Leipzig. / Includes bibliographical references.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

New version of author's dissertation, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen. / Bibliography: p. xiii-xvi.