Spelling suggestions: "subject:"pinyonjuniper woodland"" "subject:"dragonjuniper woodland""
1 |
The Piñon Ips Bark BeetleDeGomez, Tom 03 1900 (has links)
5 pp. / Pine Bark Beetles, Cypress Bark Beetles / Hosts, description and life cycle of the pinon ips and signs of infection. Management practices include maintaining tree health, sanitation and chemical sprays. Thinning is the long term solution to stressed stands. Many ecological factors are significant when managing for pinon ips.
|
2 |
The Piñon Ips Bark BeetleDeGomez, Tom, Celaya, Bob 03 1900 (has links)
Revised; Original Published: 2006 / 5 pp.
|
3 |
Catastrophic Wildfire Hazard Assessment in Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Utilizing a Managerial ParadigmBaldwin, Benjamin D. 01 May 2003 (has links)
The impetus for this research was the increasing threat of catastrophic wildfires resulting from the accumulation of fuels across the West. Guided by the priorities, goals, and guiding principles outlined by the national fire plan (NFP), the objective was to identify those areas within a pinyon-juniper woodland-dominated landscape with the highest hazard of catastrophic wildfire. The intent was to help managers prioritize proactive fuels management efforts outside of the wildland urban interface (WUI). Based on a management paradigm, constraints were placed on the data collection, analysis, and model development. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to create a hazard assessment at a landscape scale in Tintic Valley, Utah. Hazard categories were a classification of fuels based on crown cover of pinyon-juniper trees, utilizing remotely sensed data. The data set consisted of digital orthophoto quadrangle (DOQ) images from 1993. The methods were developed in three phases. Phase One resulted in a hazard assessment protocol. In Phase Two, data layers were created to further divide the hazard categories into more tractable management units. Phase Three, through the retrospective examination of recent wildfires, indicated the limitations and utility of the assessment technique. The protocol presented provides a relatively fast, inexpensive, and timely hazard classification technique for pinyon-juniper woodlands at a watershed level. It is intended to be used for coarse-scale assessments of fuel hazards for strategic planning purposes. While not appropriate for fire behavior predictions, this assessment can focus managerial efforts for additional tactical planning.
|
4 |
Fuel Response to Mechanical Mastication of Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands in UtahShakespear, Alan Wyatt 01 December 2014 (has links) (PDF)
Pinyon-juniper woodland encroachment threatens ecosystem function and diversity on sagebrush steppe. Decreased fire frequency likely favors proliferation of pinyon-juniper woodlands and subsequent decline in desirable understory species. Increased tree cover produces hazardous canopy fuel loads that contribute to severe crown fires and threaten life and property at the wildland-urban-interface. Mechanical mastication converts large canopy fuels into small woody debris, altering wildfire dynamics from a potential crown fire to a more controllable surface fire. We measured fuel loading and cover on untreated, masticated, and masticated + burned treatments on 30-m transects within 30 X 33-m subplots, representing 45 different sites throughout Utah. All variables were analyzed using mixed-model analysis of covariance with untreated or pretreatment tree cover as the covariate. Shredding trees reduced large-diameter fuels to primarily 10-hour fuels (6.4-25.4 mm diameter). Reduced fuel sizes, fuel redistribution, and fuelbed compactness resulting from mastication treatments can aid wildfire suppression. Masticated + burned treatments effectively reduced woody surface fuel loading to that of pretreatment conditions. Prescribed burning could be used outside the growing season in cool-weather, high-moisture conditions to remove surface fuels, mitigating lethal soil heating and plant mortality. Shrub loading was not adversely affected by mastication treatments, but was significantly reduced with masticated + burned treatments. Masticated and masticated + burned treatments significantly increased herbaceous fuel loading. Treating at lower tree cover values reduced fuel buildup, and provided more opportunity for a positive herbaceous response. Fuel loading estimates measured in this study were provided to populate fire behavior models for mastication treatments on our study sites when such models become available.
|
5 |
An Object-Based Image Analysis of Treated and Untreated Pinyon and Juniper Woodlands Across the Great BasinHulet, April 07 March 2012 (has links) (PDF)
Land managers need to rapidly assess vegetation composition and bare ground to effectively evaluate, manage, and restore shrub steppe communities that have been encroached by pinyon and juniper (P-J) trees. A major part of this process is assessing where to apply mechanical and prescribed fire treatments to reduce fuel loads and maintain or restore sagebrush steppe rangelands. Geospatial technologies, particularly remote sensing, offers an efficient option to assess rangelands across multiple spatial scales while reducing the need for ground-based sampling measurements. High-spatial resolution color-infrared imagery (0.06-m pixels) was acquired for sagebrush steppe communities invaded by P-J trees at five sites in Oregon, California, Nevada, and Utah with a Vexcel Ultra CamX digital camera in June/July 2009. In addition to untreated P-J woodlands, imagery was acquired over P-J woodlands where fuels were reduced by either prescribed fire, tree cutting, or mastication treatments. Ground measurements were simultaneously collected at each site in 2009 on 0.1-hectare subplots as part of the Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluation Project (SageSTEP). We used Trimble eCognition Developer to 1) develop efficient methods to estimate land cover classes found in P-J woodlands; 2) determine the relationship between ground measurements and object-based image analysis (OBIA) land cover measurements for the following classes: trees (live, burned, cut, and masticated), shrubs, perennial herbaceous vegetation, litter (including annual species), and bare ground; and 3) evaluate eCognition rule-sets (models) across four spatial scales (subplot, site, region, and network) using untreated P-J woodland imagery. At the site scale, the overall accuracy of our thematic maps for untreated P-J woodlands was 84% with a kappa statistic of 0.80. For treatments, the overall accuracy and kappa statistic for prescribed fire was 85% and 0.81; cut and fell 82% and 0.77, and mastication 84% and 0.80, respectively, each indicating strong agreement between OBIA classification and ground measured data. Differences between mean cover estimates using OBIA and ground-measurements were not consistently higher or lower for any land cover class and when evaluated for individual sites, were within 5% of each other; all regional and network OBIA mean cover estimates were within 10% of the ground measurements. The trade-off for decreased precision over a larger area (region and network scale) may be useful to prioritize fuel-management strategies but will unlikely capture subtle shifts in understory plant communities that site and subplot spatial scales often capture. Although cover assessments from OBIA differed somewhat from ground measurements, they were accurate enough for many landscape-assessment applications such as evaluating treatment success and assessing the spatial distribution of fuels following fuel-reduction treatments on a site scale.
|
Page generated in 0.042 seconds