Spelling suggestions: "subject:"pollination""
1 |
Pollinating insect responses to grazing intensity, grassland characteristics, and landscape complexity : behaviour, species diversity, and composition /Sjödin, N. Erik, January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2007. / Thesis documentation sheet inserted. Includes appendix of four papers and manuscripts, two co-authored with others. Includes bibliographical references. Also issued electronically via World Wide Web in PDF format; online version lacks appendix.
|
2 |
Pollinators of slender white prairiecloverPearce, April Marie. January 2008 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (MS)--Montana State University--Bozeman, 2008. / Typescript. Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Kevin O'Neill. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 95-102).
|
3 |
Nectar in nicotiana pollinator associations, sources of variation, and evolutionary consequences /Kaczorowski, Rainee L., January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on September 25, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
4 |
Monitoring, assessing and evaluating the pollinator species (Hymenoptera: apoidea) found on a native brush site, a revegetated site and an urban gardenCate, Carrie Ann 15 May 2009 (has links)
This research presents the findings of a pollinator diversity study that took place
at three study sites. Although variation in pollinator diversity occurred between the
three sites, fewer pollinators than expected were recorded from the La Joya Tract
(revegetated site). Numerous genera and species were recorded from the Havana Tract
(native site) as well as the Valley Nature Center (urban garden). In contrast, the La Joya
Tract had a comparatively depauperate pollinator fauna.
The numbers of pollinator genera and species recorded from the three study sites
were decreased in comparison to the total number of genera and species recorded from
Hidalgo County. Hidalgo County has 35 known genera and 75 species of bees
documented to date. About 40% of the genera and 23% of the species recorded from
Hidalgo County were recorded from the Havana Tract in this study, while a mere 8.5%
of the genera and 4% of the species were reported from the La Joya Tract and 34% of
the genera and 16% of the species were reported from the Valley Nature Center.
Although the vascular plant species identified from these study sites were diverse, the floral rewards they provided yielded an insight as to what was going on in
terms of pollinator diversity. Plants may yield nectar or pollen floral rewards or both in
some cases to pollinators. The current study provides evidence that revegetation of land
with plants that primarily provide nectar rewards will result in fewer observed bee taxa
than from land revegetated with plants that provide a mix of nectar and pollen floral
rewards.
|
5 |
Nectar in Nicotiana : pollinator associations, sources of variation, and evolutionary consequences /Kaczorowski, Rainee L. January 2007 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available in PDF format via the Internet.
|
6 |
Frequency-dependent selection amongst floral variants through the foraging behaviour of bumblebees, Bombus terrestrisSmithson, Ann January 1995 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Forest fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions in Western Kenya /Bergsdorf, Thomas. Unknown Date (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Bonn, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 88-93). Also available via the internet.
|
8 |
The feeding response of white-bellied sunbirds (Cinnyris [Nectarinia] talatala) to sugar concentration and viscosity of artificial nectarLeseigneur, Carolina Del Carmen 19 November 2008 (has links)
Plant nectar is a simple food and is easily digested by many different species of pollinators. Many compounds make up the composition of floral nectars, but the most abundant are sugars, generally dominated by sucrose and the hexoses, glucose and fructose. Nectar sugars have been measured for many plant species visited by hummingbirds, sunbirds and other passerines, revealing a range of concentrations. The nectars of passerine-pollinated flowers are generally dilute compared to those of bee-pollinated flowers. The question why bird nectars are so dilute has been addressed in many studies. Many hypotheses have been proposed, among them the relationship between viscosity and drinking by birds. The viscosity of sugar solutions increases exponentially with increasing concentration, and capillarity is inversely proportional to viscosity. Nectarivorous birds imbibe nectar by capillarity, and high sugar concentrations could impose constraints on their feeding efficiency. Feeding in nectarivorous birds, especially hummingbirds, has been mostly devoted to assessing sugar type preferences. However, concentration preferences have received less attention, and the effect of viscosity on feeding has not been examined separately from sugar concentration for any bird species. Do nectarivorous birds show a preference for specific concentrations at a broad and a fine scale of difference, given a specific sugar type? Does viscosity impose a feeding limitation on nectarivorous birds? Does it affect their feeding behaviour? Sunbirds and other nectar-feeding birds can choose amongst various flowering plant species at any one time. Their feeding responses may have important consequences on pollination ecology. In this study, concentration preferences of white-bellied sunbirds were examined using paired solutions of either sucrose or equicaloric 1:1 mixtures of glucose and fructose, at a both a broad and a fine scale of difference between pairs over the concentration range of 0.25 to 2.5 M. I hypothesized that sunbirds would prefer concentrations of 1 M and higher on sucrose solutions, while preferring concentrations less than 1 M on hexose solutions. On both sugar types at the broad scale, the higher concentration was significantly preferred up to 1 M, suggesting a preference for 1 M sugar solutions. At a finer scale, white-bellied sunbirds were able to discriminate 0.03 and 0.05 M (1 and 2% w/w) concentration differences between sucrose and hexose solutions respectively. This discrimination is similar to that reported at low concentrations for other passerine nectar-feeders, and at higher concentrations for hummingbirds. To determine if high viscosity nectars limit the sugar intake of avian nectar consumers, white-bellied sunbirds were exposed to three different test series of sucrose solutions: control series (CS, pure sucrose 0.25 – 2.5 M), constant viscosity series (CVS, 0.25 – 0.7 M with increased viscosity equivalent to that of 1 M sucrose) and constant concentration series (CCS, 1 M with increased viscosities equivalent to that of 1.5, 2 and 2.5 M sucrose). Viscosities were artificially altered with Tylose®. The sunbirds had reduced intake rates and gained less energy on more viscous sucrose solutions. Also, sunbirds did not alter their feeding behaviour (feeding frequency, feeding duration, total feeding duration and feeding interval) in any significant way when feeding on more viscous sucrose solutions. This lack of change in feeding behaviour led to lower sugar intake rates and sugar consumption. These results suggest that sunbirds suffer a preingestional limitation when consuming nectars with viscosities higher than those due to sugar concentration alone. / Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Zoology and Entomology / unrestricted
|
9 |
Pollinators Contribute to the Maintenance of Flowering Plant DiversityWei, Na, Kaczorowski, Rainee L., Arceo-Gómez, Gerardo, O’Neill, Elizabeth M., Hayes, Rebecca A., Ashman, Tia L. 30 September 2021 (has links)
Mechanisms that favour rare species are key to the maintenance of diverse communities1–3. One of the most critical tasks for conservation of flowering plant biodiversity is to understand how plant–pollinator interactions contribute to the maintenance of rare species4–7. Here we show that niche partitioning in pollinator use and asymmetric facilitation confer fitness advantage of rarer species in a biodiversity hotspot using phylogenetic structural equation modelling that integrates plant–pollinator and interspecific pollen transfer networks with floral functional traits. Co-flowering species filtered pollinators via floral traits, and rarer species showed greater pollinator specialization leading to higher pollination-mediated male and female fitness than more abundant species. When plants shared pollinator resources, asymmetric facilitation via pollen transport dynamics benefitted the rarer species at the cost of more abundant species, serving as an alternative diversity-promoting mechanism. Our results emphasize the importance of community-wide plant–pollinator interactions that affect reproduction for biodiversity maintenance.
|
10 |
Effectiveness of Pollinator Enhancements in Portland Community OrchardsTyler, Jess Alan 18 July 2018 (has links)
In urban areas, residential and community gardens are potential floral resources for pollinators. Pollinator "friendly" gardens are a popular way to support this ecosystem service, but the pollinator plant list recommendations lack empirical evidence to show which plants are most attractive to potential pollinators. This project used a community science survey based on a morpho-species protocol to monitor five community orchards in Portland, Oregon during six months of the growing season in 2017. Overall, orchards with higher floral species richness supported higher richness and abundance of pollinators, but the pollinator communities were not significantly different among the orchard sites. Orchard fruit-set had a variable correlation with pollinator richness and abundance. At the landscape level, the number of miles of street within 500m showed a strong negative correlation with the overall pollinator community richness. Bumble bee abundance showed a strong negative correlation with the percentage of single family residential zoning, and NDVI at 2000 meters. Our community science approach promoted volunteer awareness of pollinator diversity in Portland, but did not increase volunteer intention to conserve pollinators. This research helped build evidence of the dynamics of urban pollinators and the role that community science can play in pollinator biodiversity monitoring.
|
Page generated in 0.0743 seconds