Field-based liquefaction evaluation procedures include the stress-based, strain-based, and energybased based approaches. The existence of a volumetric threshold shear strain, γtv, under which there is no development of excess pore pressures, and the unique relationship between pore pressure ratio and cyclic shear strain, γc, make a compelling argument for using a strain-based approach. However, the cyclic strain approach has not yet been standardized for field evaluations. The primary objective of this thesis is to use published databases of 415 shear-wave velocity and 230 Standard Penetration Test liquefaction field case histories to investigate the performance of the cyclic strain approach for the evaluation of initial liquefaction relative to the cyclic stress approach. Additionally, the concept of the γtv is expressed in terms of the peak ground surface acceleration and defined as the threshold amax. Computing (amax)t could provide a fast and simple evaluation for initial liquefaction, where no liquefaction is expected for a minimum computed (amax)t determined from the case histories. The variant of the strain-based procedure proposed herein avoids the direct need for laboratory cyclic testing by employing pore pressure generation models that are functions of cyclic shear strain, number of equivalent cycles, and relative density to predict initial liquefaction. The results from the proposed procedure are compared with those of the stress-based approach to determine which better matches the field observations of the case histories. It was found that the cyclic strain approach resulted in 70% to 77% correct predictions. In contrast, the cyclic stress approach yielded 87% to 90% correct predictions. The reasons why the predictions were not always correct with the cyclic strain approach are due to inherent limitations of the cyclic strain approach. Most significantly, an inherent and potentially fatal limitation of the strain-based procedure is it ignoring the softening of the soil stiffness due to excess pore pressure in representing the earthquake loading in terms of γc and neqγ. / Master of Science

This thesis presents validation and application of advanced soil constitutive models in cases of seismic loading conditions. Firstly, results of three advanced soil constitutive models are compared with examples of shear stack experimental data for free field response in dry sand for shear and compression wave propagation. Higher harmonic generation in acceleration records, observed in experimental works, is shown to be possibly the result of soil nonlinearity and fast elastic unloading waves. This finding is shown to have high importance on structural response, real earthquake records and reliability of conventionally employed numerical tools. Finally, short study of free field response in saturated soil reveals similar findings on higher harmonic generation. Secondly, two advanced soil constitutive models are used, and their performance is assessed based on examples of experimental data on piles in dry sand in order to validate the ability of the constitutive models to simulate seismic soil-structure interaction. The validation includes various experimental configurations and input motions. The discussion on the results focuses on constitutive and numerical modelling aspects. Some improvements in the formulations of the models are suggested based on the detailed investigation. Finally, the application of one of the advanced soil constitutive models is shown in regard to temporary natural frequency wandering observed in structures subjected to earthquakes. Results show that pore pressure generated during seismic events causes changes in soil stiffness, thus affecting the natural frequency of the structure during and just after the seismic event. Parametric studies present how soil permeability, soil density, input motion or a type of structure may affect the structural natural frequency and time for its return to the initial value. In addition, a time history with an aftershock is analysed to investigate the difference in structural response during the earthquake and the aftershock.