<p>Ova studija je bila prospektivnog karaktera. Uz dopu&scaron;tenje etičkog komiteta Kliničkog centra Vojvodine istraživanje je sprovedeno na Klinici za ortopedsku hirurgiju i traumatologiju i obuhvatilo je 60 pacijenata mu&scaron;kog pola, koji su metodom slučajnog izbora na randomizirani način uključeni u ispitivanje, a koji se aktivno i profesionalno bave fudbalom, ko&scaron;arkom ili odbojkom,&nbsp; primljenih na Kliniku za ortopedsku hirurgiju radi artroskopske rekonstrukcije pokidanog prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta. U ispitivanje su uključeni samo oni pacijenti koji su dali potpisani informisani pristanak da učestvuju u ispitivanju, koji su zadovoljii sve kriterijume za uključivanje i koji nisu imali niti jedan kriterijum za isključivanje iz studije. Kriterijumi za uključivanje u studiju&nbsp; podrazumevali su sledeće: da je pacijent&nbsp; primljen na Kliniku za ortopedsku hirurgiju i traumatologiju Kliničkog centra Vojvodine u Novom Sadu radi operativnog lečenja prekida prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena, da je potpisao informisani pristanak za uključivanje, da je starosne dobi od 18 do 45 godina, da se aktivno i profesionalno bave fizičkom aktivno&scaron;ću regulisanom pravilima (fudbal, odbojka, ko&scaron;arka). Kriterijumi za isključivanje pacijenata iz istraživanja bili su sledeći: prisustvo udružene povrede i spolja&scaron;njeg pobočnog ligamenta koja zahteva operativno lečenje, pojava težih op&scaron;te &ndash; hirur&scaron;kih komplikacija, želja pacijenta da bude isključen iz daljeg ispitivanja, bez obaveze da tu svoju odluku obrazloži. U prvoj fazi konstruisan je aparat, digitalni goniometar, uz pomoć kojeg je urađen eksperimentalni deo ovog ispitivanja i napravljena je baza podataka sa poljima za upis deskriptivnih i antropometrijskih parametara. Potom je uz pomoć aparata svim ispitanicima testirana sposobnost propriocepcije (JPS). Testiranje&nbsp; je obavljeno preoperativno na povređenom i nepovređenom ekstremitetu, u dva maha: odmah po zadavanju ciljnog ugla od 35&deg; i nakon 5 minuta. Druga faza je obavljena minimum 6 meseci nakon operativnog lečenja, hirur&scaron;kom, artroskopskom rekonstrukcijom pokidanog prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kost-tetiva-kost tehnikom (bone-tendo-bone, BTB). Klinički pregled&nbsp; svakog pacijenta je podrazumevao proveru rezultata Lachman testa (pozitivan/negativan), Lysholm i IKDC bodovne skale za koleno i to preoperativno a potom i tokom postoperativnog kontrolnog pregleda. Po uzoru na mnoge sajtove renomiranih ortopedskih organizacija (http://www.orthopaedicscore.com/), naparavljen je on-line upitnik na Google drive-u gde su u elektronskom obliku prikupljani podaci za skale koje smo koristili. Dobijeni rezultati su za svaku skalu ponaosob potom prebacivani u Excel i dalje&nbsp; obrađivani adekvatnim statističkim alatkama u adekvatnom programu. U rezultatima je uočeno da dobijena razlika u preciznosti pozicioniranja potkolenice sa o&scaron;tećenim ligamentarnim aparatom kolena u odnosu na nepovređenu nogu pre hirur&scaron;ke rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta ne pokazuje statistički značajnu razliku. Međutim, postojala je statistički značajna razlika u brzini kojom se postiže zadati ugao, tj. povređena noga imala je veći intenzitet ugaonog uspona &scaron;to ukazuje na kvalitativne razlike u samom obrascu pokreta. Takođe, na ovom uzorku dobijeno je da postoji statistički značajna razlika u preciznosti pozicioniranja potkolenice sa o&scaron;tećenim ligamentarnim aparatom kolena u odnosu na nepovređenu nogu nakon hirur&scaron;ke rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta tj. pacijenti su nakon rekonstrukcije statistički značajno &raquo;prebacivali&laquo; zadatu vrednost od 35&deg;. Test pozicioniranja ekstremiteta za ovo ispitivanje konstruisanim aparatom se pokazao kao senzitivna i specifična dijagnostička procedura gubitka sposobnosti propriocepcije usled kidanja prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta.</p> / <p>In this prospective study examined group consisted&nbsp; of&nbsp; 60&nbsp; male&nbsp; patients&nbsp; with&nbsp; an anterior&nbsp; cruciate&nbsp; ligament&nbsp; tear&nbsp; and&nbsp; all participants&nbsp;&nbsp; were&nbsp;&nbsp; at&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp; time&nbsp;&nbsp; before injury&nbsp;&nbsp; actively&nbsp;&nbsp; playing&nbsp;&nbsp; afootball, basketball&nbsp; or&nbsp; volleyball.&nbsp; The&nbsp; study&nbsp; was conducted&nbsp; at&nbsp; the&nbsp; Clinic&nbsp; for&nbsp; Orthopaedic Surgery&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; and&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Traumatology&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Clinical Center&nbsp; of&nbsp; Vojvodina&nbsp; in&nbsp; Novi&nbsp; Sad&nbsp; where participants&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; were&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; admitted&nbsp;&nbsp; for arthroscopic ligament reconstruction. All participants&nbsp; were&nbsp; informed&nbsp; of&nbsp; the&nbsp; study by&nbsp;&nbsp; their&nbsp;&nbsp; clinicians&nbsp;&nbsp; and&nbsp;&nbsp; gave&nbsp;&nbsp; written consent. Thee exclusion criteria were the following:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; occurrence&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; combined cruciate&nbsp; ligament&nbsp; with&nbsp; lateral&nbsp; collateral ligament&nbsp;&nbsp; injury&nbsp;&nbsp; that&nbsp;&nbsp; required&nbsp;&nbsp; surgical treatment;&nbsp; occurrence&nbsp; of&nbsp; more&nbsp; serious general&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; surgical complications; the patient&rsquo;s&nbsp; wish&nbsp; to&nbsp; be&nbsp; excluded&nbsp; from further&nbsp; research&nbsp; without&nbsp; an&nbsp; obligation&nbsp; to give&nbsp;&nbsp; any&nbsp;&nbsp; further&nbsp;&nbsp; explanation&nbsp;&nbsp; to&nbsp;&nbsp; his decision.&nbsp; In&nbsp; the&nbsp; first&nbsp; stage&nbsp; of&nbsp; the&nbsp; study, an&nbsp; apparatus&nbsp; called&nbsp; digital&nbsp; goniometer was&nbsp;&nbsp; constructed,&nbsp;&nbsp; which&nbsp;&nbsp; was&nbsp;&nbsp; used&nbsp;&nbsp; to conduct&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp; experimental&nbsp;&nbsp; part&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; the study,&nbsp; and&nbsp; a&nbsp; database&nbsp; with&nbsp; fields&nbsp; for inserting&nbsp; descriptive&nbsp; and&nbsp; anthropometric parameters was made. Next, by using the apparatus,&nbsp; all&nbsp; subjects&nbsp; were&nbsp; tested&nbsp; for proprioception&nbsp; ability&nbsp; (JPS).&nbsp; The&nbsp; tests were&nbsp; performed&nbsp; preoperatively&nbsp; on&nbsp; the injured&nbsp; and&nbsp; the&nbsp; uninjured&nbsp; limb&nbsp; in&nbsp; two instances:&nbsp; straight&nbsp; after&nbsp; determining&nbsp; the target&nbsp;&nbsp; angle&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; 35&deg;&nbsp; and&nbsp;&nbsp; 5&nbsp;&nbsp; minutes afterwards.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; second&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; stage&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; was performed&nbsp; postoperatively&nbsp; in&nbsp; the&nbsp; same maner,&nbsp;&nbsp; following&nbsp;&nbsp; a&nbsp;&nbsp; minimal&nbsp;&nbsp; 6-month period&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; after&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; a&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; surgical&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; arthroscopic reconstruction&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; torn&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; anterior cruciate&nbsp; ligament&nbsp; by&nbsp; bone-tendon-bone (BTB) technique. The clinical evaluation of&nbsp; each&nbsp; patient&nbsp; involved&nbsp; Lachman&nbsp; test (positive / negative), Lysholm and IKDC scales,&nbsp;&nbsp; first&nbsp;&nbsp; pre-operatively&nbsp;&nbsp; and&nbsp;&nbsp; then during&nbsp;&nbsp; post-operative&nbsp; check&nbsp; up assessment.&nbsp; Following&nbsp; the&nbsp; example&nbsp; of many&nbsp; websites&nbsp; or&nbsp; eminent&nbsp; orthopaedic organisations (http://www.orthopaedicscore.com/),&nbsp;&nbsp; an online&nbsp;&nbsp; survey&nbsp;&nbsp; was&nbsp;&nbsp; made&nbsp;&nbsp; on&nbsp;&nbsp; Google Drive,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; where&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; data&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; was&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; collected electronically&nbsp; for&nbsp; the&nbsp; scales&nbsp; used.&nbsp; The results were then transferred to Excel for each&nbsp; scale,&nbsp; to&nbsp; be&nbsp; further&nbsp; processed&nbsp; by using&nbsp;&nbsp; adequate&nbsp;&nbsp; statistic&nbsp;&nbsp; tools&nbsp;&nbsp; in&nbsp;&nbsp; an adequate&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; programme.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; results indicated&nbsp; that,&nbsp; when&nbsp; compared&nbsp; with&nbsp; the uninjured&nbsp; leg,&nbsp; a&nbsp; resulting&nbsp; disparity&nbsp; in precision&nbsp; of&nbsp; positioning&nbsp; the&nbsp; lower&nbsp; leg with&nbsp; a&nbsp; damaged&nbsp; ligament&nbsp; apparatus&nbsp; of the&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; knee&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; before&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; surgical reconstruction&nbsp; of&nbsp; the&nbsp; anterior&nbsp; cruciate ligament&nbsp; was&nbsp; not&nbsp; considered&nbsp; statistically significant.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; However,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; there&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; was&nbsp; a statistically&nbsp; significant&nbsp; difference&nbsp; in&nbsp; the speed&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; attaining&nbsp;&nbsp; a&nbsp;&nbsp; specified&nbsp;&nbsp; angle which indicates qualitative differences in the&nbsp; motion&nbsp; pattern&nbsp; itself.&nbsp; Furthermore, this&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; sample&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; study&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; resulted&nbsp;&nbsp; in&nbsp; a statistically&nbsp; significant&nbsp; difference&nbsp; in&nbsp; the precision&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; positioning&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; lower leg&nbsp; with&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; damaged&nbsp;&nbsp; knee&nbsp; ligament apparatus&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; after&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp; surgical reconstruction&nbsp; of&nbsp; the&nbsp; anterior&nbsp; cruciate ligament,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; when&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; compared&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; with&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the uninjured&nbsp; leg,&nbsp; i.e.&nbsp; after&nbsp;&nbsp; the reconstruction,&nbsp; the&nbsp; patients&nbsp;&nbsp; had&nbsp;&nbsp; a significantly&nbsp;&nbsp; higher&nbsp;&nbsp; degree&nbsp;&nbsp; of&nbsp;&nbsp; flexion than&nbsp;&nbsp; the&nbsp;&nbsp; targeted&nbsp;&nbsp; 35&deg;.&nbsp;&nbsp; The&nbsp;&nbsp; test&nbsp;&nbsp; for positioning&nbsp; extremities,&nbsp; performed&nbsp; with the&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; specially&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; constructed&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; apparatus, proved&nbsp; to&nbsp; be&nbsp; a&nbsp; sensitive&nbsp; and&nbsp; specific diagnostic procedure for determining the loss&nbsp; of&nbsp; proprioceptic&nbsp; ability&nbsp; due&nbsp; to anterior cruciate ligament tear.</p>

<p>Povrede adolescenata predstavljaju rastući javno zdravstveni problem. Iako fizička aktivnost ima dokazanu vi&scaron;estruku korist po zdravlje pojedinca, ona je povezana sa rizikom od povreda, posebno u zemljama sa nedovoljno razvijenim strategijama za prevenciju istih. Cilj istraživanja bio je da se utvrdi povezanost između intenzivne fizičke aktivnosti i povreda, da li nivo fizičke aktivnosti utiče na rizično i protektivno pona&scaron;anje adolescenata, i da se identifikuju okolnosti i okruženje u kom se povrede najče&scaron;će de&scaron;avaju. Za istraživanje je kori&scaron;ćena retrospektivno-prospektivna kohortna studija na odabranom uzorku adolescenata od 15-19 godina koji pohađaju srednju &scaron;kolu. Putem standardnog internacionalnog upitnika o fizičkoj aktivnosti IPAQ i dobijenog MET skora, izdvojen je deo kohorte adolescenata izložen intenzivnoj fizičkoj aktivnosti. Kontrolnu grupu činili su umereno fizički aktivni i neaktivni adolescenti. U periodu od 12 meseci registrovane su sve vrste povreda adolescenata putem upitnika o povredama. Povrede koje su zahtevale medicinski tretman registrovane su kroz zdravstvenu dokumentaciju &scaron;kolskog dispanzera, sportske ambulante doma zdravlja, hitne medicinske pomoći i urgentnog odeljenja op&scaron;te bolnice. Klasifikacija i analiza podataka o povredama izvr&scaron;ena je prema prirodi povreda (S00-T98) na osnovu Međunarodne klasifikacije bolesti (MKB-10, 1996.). Rizik za povrede bio je sedam puta veći u grupi intenzivno fizički aktivnih adolescenata u odnosu na kontrolnu grupu (RR: 7,041; 95%CI: 6,071; 8,187). Rizik za povrede koje su zahtevale medicinski tretman, prema rezultatima prikupljenim u zdravstvenim ustanovama, bio je 15 puta veći kod adolescenata koji se intenzivno bave fizičkom aktivno&scaron;ću (RR: 14,717; 95%CI: 10,652; 20,592). Fizički aktivni učenici su se najvi&scaron;e povređivali na sportskim terenima, dok su se umereno aktivni i neaktivni najče&scaron;će povređivali u kućnom okruženju. Rizik da zadobiju sportske povrede bio je 11 puta veći kod fizički aktivnih ispitanika (RR: 11,212; 95%CI: 9,013; 14,074), sa značajno vi&scaron;om stopom incidencije kod mu&scaron;karaca (82,9/100). Na treningu i utakmici povrede je zadobilo 85,2% fizički aktivnih adolescenata, dok su kod umereno aktivnih i neaktivnih sportske povrede najče&scaron;će registrovane u &scaron;kolskom okruženju (37,5%). Najvi&scaron;e povreda registrovano je u fudbalu (Inc. 4.44/1000 h), odbojci (Inc. 3.92/1000 h) i boksu/kik boksu (Inc. 3.75/1000 h). Intenzitet fizičke aktivnosti nije imao uticaja na smanjenje rizičnog pona&scaron;anja kod adolescenata, kao &scaron;to je kori&scaron;ćenje alkohola, psihoaktivnih supstanci i nasilno pona&scaron;anje. Nivo protektivnog pona&scaron;anja bio je generalno nizak u obe grupe ispitanika. Kori&scaron;ćenje za&scaron;titne kacige i za&scaron;titne sportske opreme bilo je značajno zastupljenije u grupi intenzivno fizički aktivnih adolelescenata, ali nije utvrđen njihov uticaj na smanjenje rizika od povreda.</p> / <p>Injuries among adolescents represent growing public health issue. Although physical activity provides proven multiple benefits to the health of individuals, it is also associated with a risk of injuries, particularly in countries with less developed strategies for their prevention. The objective of the research was to determine the relation between vigorous physical activity and injuries, whether the level of physical activity affects the risk and protective behaviour among adolescents, and to identify the circumstances and environment in which the injuries most often occur. The research used a retrospective-prospective cohort study on a selected sample of adolescents aged 15-19 years attending secondary school. The part of the cohort of adolescents exposed to vigorous physical activity was separated through the standard international questionnaire on physical activity IPAQ and the resulting MET score. The control group consisted of moderately physically active and inactive adolescents. All types of injuries among adolescents within the 12 months were registered through a questionnaire. Injuries requiring medical treatment were registered through the health records of school and sports ambulances, emergency medical services and Emergency Department of the General Hospital. Classification and analysis of injury data was performed according to the nature of the injuries (S00 - T98) based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD - 10, 1996). The risk of injury was seven times higher in the group of vigorous physically active adolescents than in the control group (RR: 7,041; 95%CI: 6,071; 8,187). The risk of injuries that required medical treatment was 15 times higher among adolescents who are intensively engaged in physical activity (RR: 14,717; 95%CI: 10,652; 20,592). Physically active students are most frequently injured on the sports fields, while moderately active and inactive students are most frequently injured in the home environment. The risk to suffer sports injuries was 11 times higher among physically active participants (RR: 11,212; 95%CI: 9,013; 14,074) with a significantly higher incidence rate among men (82,9/100). On training and during the game 85,2% of physically active adolescents suffered from injuries, while among inactive participants sports injuries were most often registered in the school environment (37,5%). The most injuries were registered in soccer (Inc. 4.44/1000 h), volleyball (Inc. 3.92/1000 h) and boxing/kick boxing (Inc. 3.75/1000 h). The intensity of physical activity had no impact on reducing risk behaviour among adolescents, such as the use of alcohol, psychoactive substances and violent behavior. The level of protective behavior was generally low in both groups. The use of protective helmets and protective sports equipment was significantly more frequently present among vigorous physically active adolescents, but their influence on reducing the risk of injuries was not determined.</p>

<p>Тешка траума се може дефинисати на неколико различитих начина. Најчешће коришћена дефиниција укључује коришћење Injury Severity Score ( ISS скор). Ако је вредност ISS скор &gt;15, ради се о тешкој трауми. Траума је временски осетљиво стање, због тога је за збрињавање тешко повређених пацијената неопходна добра сарадња различитих нивоа здравствене заштите и здравствених стручњака различитих специјалности. У претходних неколико деценија, због сложенијег процеса лечења и великих трошкова, дошло је до потребе за што објективнијом проценом стања повређеног и исхода лечења. Циљ: Упоредити сензитивност и специфичност T-RTS скорa (Triage Revised Trauma Score), CRAMS скалe (Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor and Speech), МGAP скора (Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and arterial Pressure) и GAP скора (Glasgow coma scale, Age, and arterial Pressure) примењених на прехоспиталном нивоу, проценити могућности прехоспитално примењених RTS, CRAMS, МGAP и GAP скорова у предикцији исхода лечења повређеног пацијента и утврдити значај појединачних фактора, одређиваних на прехоспиталном нивоу током иницијалног прегледa повређеног, за процену тежине повреде и предикцију исхода лечења повређеног. Истраживање је проспективног, опсервационог карактера. У истраживање су укључени пацијенти старији од 18 година, које су лекари Заводa за хитну медицинску помоћ Нови Сад (ЗЗХМП НС) и Службe хитне медицинске помоћи Дома здравља Бечеј (СХМП ДЗ Бечеј) збрињавали на терену након трауме, а потом их транспортовали у Ургентни центар Клиничког центра Војводине (УЦ КЦВ). На основу вредности ISS скора пацијенти су сврстани у једну од две групе: група А- пацијенти код којих је ISS скор након завршене дијагностике изнад 15- тешка траума и група Б -пацијенти код којих је након завршене дијагностике ISS скор &le;15- лака траума. У групи А је било 50, а у групи Б 257 пацијената. За граничне вредности скорова које означавају да траума није лака, највећу сензитивност у оцени тежине трауме је имао GAP скор 98,8%, а највећу специфичност MGAP скор 62%. У предвиђању исхода лечења, највећу сензитивност је имао RTS скор за предикцију 95,2%, а специфичност GAP скор и CRAMS скала 87,5%. MGAP скор, а пошто је у снажној корелацији са њим и GAP скор, мерени прехоспитално, су се издвојили као независни предиктор у оцени тежине трауме и предвиђању исхода лечења повређеног. Т- RTS скор и CRAMS скала су се издвојили као појединачни предиктори у оцени тежине трауме, али не и као независни предиктори. RTS скор за предикцију нема статистичку значајност у предвиђању исхода лечења повређеног, за разлику од CRAMS скале која има, али се није издвојила као независни предиктор исхода лечења. Осим наведених траума скорова, као независни предиктори у оцени тежине трауме издвојили су се: систолни крвни притисак, SaO2 у периферној крви мерена пулсном оксиметријом, повреда главе и врата и повреда грудног коша. За предвиђање исхода лечења повређеног само се SaO2 у периферној крви мерена пулсном оксиметријом издвојила као појединачни предиктор, али не и као независни предиктор исхода.</p> / <p>Teška trauma se može definisati na nekoliko različitih načina. Najčešće korišćena definicija uključuje korišćenje Injury Severity Score ( ISS skor). Ako je vrednost ISS skor &gt;15, radi se o teškoj traumi. Trauma je vremenski osetljivo stanje, zbog toga je za zbrinjavanje teško povređenih pacijenata neophodna dobra saradnja različitih nivoa zdravstvene zaštite i zdravstvenih stručnjaka različitih specijalnosti. U prethodnih nekoliko decenija, zbog složenijeg procesa lečenja i velikih troškova, došlo je do potrebe za što objektivnijom procenom stanja povređenog i ishoda lečenja. Cilj: Uporediti senzitivnost i specifičnost T-RTS skora (Triage Revised Trauma Score), CRAMS skale (Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor and Speech), MGAP skora (Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and arterial Pressure) i GAP skora (Glasgow coma scale, Age, and arterial Pressure) primenjenih na prehospitalnom nivou, proceniti mogućnosti prehospitalno primenjenih RTS, CRAMS, MGAP i GAP skorova u predikciji ishoda lečenja povređenog pacijenta i utvrditi značaj pojedinačnih faktora, određivanih na prehospitalnom nivou tokom inicijalnog pregleda povređenog, za procenu težine povrede i predikciju ishoda lečenja povređenog. Istraživanje je prospektivnog, opservacionog karaktera. U istraživanje su uključeni pacijenti stariji od 18 godina, koje su lekari Zavoda za hitnu medicinsku pomoć Novi Sad (ZZHMP NS) i Službe hitne medicinske pomoći Doma zdravlja Bečej (SHMP DZ Bečej) zbrinjavali na terenu nakon traume, a potom ih transportovali u Urgentni centar Kliničkog centra Vojvodine (UC KCV). Na osnovu vrednosti ISS skora pacijenti su svrstani u jednu od dve grupe: grupa A- pacijenti kod kojih je ISS skor nakon završene dijagnostike iznad 15- teška trauma i grupa B -pacijenti kod kojih je nakon završene dijagnostike ISS skor &le;15- laka trauma. U grupi A je bilo 50, a u grupi B 257 pacijenata. Za granične vrednosti skorova koje označavaju da trauma nije laka, najveću senzitivnost u oceni težine traume je imao GAP skor 98,8%, a najveću specifičnost MGAP skor 62%. U predviđanju ishoda lečenja, najveću senzitivnost je imao RTS skor za predikciju 95,2%, a specifičnost GAP skor i CRAMS skala 87,5%. MGAP skor, a pošto je u snažnoj korelaciji sa njim i GAP skor, mereni prehospitalno, su se izdvojili kao nezavisni prediktor u oceni težine traume i predviđanju ishoda lečenja povređenog. T- RTS skor i CRAMS skala su se izdvojili kao pojedinačni prediktori u oceni težine traume, ali ne i kao nezavisni prediktori. RTS skor za predikciju nema statističku značajnost u predviđanju ishoda lečenja povređenog, za razliku od CRAMS skale koja ima, ali se nije izdvojila kao nezavisni prediktor ishoda lečenja. Osim navedenih trauma skorova, kao nezavisni prediktori u oceni težine traume izdvojili su se: sistolni krvni pritisak, SaO2 u perifernoj krvi merena pulsnom oksimetrijom, povreda glave i vrata i povreda grudnog koša. Za predviđanje ishoda lečenja povređenog samo se SaO2 u perifernoj krvi merena pulsnom oksimetrijom izdvojila kao pojedinačni prediktor, ali ne i kao nezavisni prediktor ishoda.</p> / <p>Severe trauma could be defined in several ways. The most commonly used definition includes Injury Severity Score (ISS) and severe trauma is determined if ISS &gt;15. Trauma management is a time sensitive issue and a coordination between different levels of health system and many specialists is vital in the treatment of severe trauma. In the last decades, a need for the objective evaluation of the severity of trauma and its outcome was perceived due to the complex management and treatment of trauma and its costs. Aim of the study: to compare the sensitivity and specificity between prehospital scores T-RTS (Revised Trauma Score), CRAMS (Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motors, Speech), MGAP (Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Arterial Pressure) and GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Arterial Pressure), to assess the predictability of prehospital scores (RTS, CRAMS, MGAP and GAP) in the outcome of traumatized patients, to determine the significance of individual factors, initially determined during the prehospital evaluation, in evaluating the severity of trauma and the outcome of treatment. Patients enrolled into this prospective observational study were older than 18, prehospitally treated on the trauma site by the doctors of the Institute of the Emergency Medicine Novi Sad and Health Centre Bečej &ndash; Emergency Medical Service and afterward transported into the Emergency Centre Novi Sad. Based on ISS values, patients were divided into two groups: Group A &ndash; severe trauma (50 patients; ISS&gt;15) and Group B &ndash; mild trauma (257 patients; ISS&le;15). For the broder values of scores, determining the severity of trauma, GAP had the highest sensitivity (98%), while MGAP had the highest specificity (62%). RTS had the highest sensitivity in predicting the outcome (95.2%), while GAP and CRAMS had specificity of 87.5%. Prehospital MGAP score, in strong correlation with GAP, was singled out for its independent predictive value in determining the severity of trauma and its outcome. T-RTS and CRAMS stood out to be individual &ndash; but not independent &ndash; predictors in evaluating the severity of trauma. RTS was not statistically significant in predicting the outcome, in contrast with CRAMS. However, CRAMS was not singled out as an independent predictor of the outcome. In addition to the scores, independent predictors of the severity of trauma were: systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) by using the pulse oximeter, head, neck and thorax injuries. Only SaO2 proved to be a single &ndash; but not independent &ndash; predictor of the outcome.</p>

<p>Ispitivanu grupu činilo je 1247 ispitanika sa povredama prednje ukr&scaron;tene veze kolena koji su operativno lečeni u periodu 2012.-2017. godina na Klinici za ortopedsku hirurgiju i traumatologiju Kliničkog centra Vojvodine. Ciljevi istraživanja bili su utvrđivanje uticaja nivoa sportske aktivnosti i mehanizama povređivanja na nastanak povreda prednje ukr&scaron;tene veze kolena, zatim uticaj spolja&scaron;njih faktora rizika (vrsta sporta, rang takmičenja, vrsta podloge, trening ili utakmica, period treninga) na nastanak povreda prednje ukr&scaron;tene veze kolena, odnosno uticaj unutra&scaron;njih faktora rizika (pol, starost, BMI) na nastanak povreda ove strukture kolena. Od ukupnog broja ispitanika njih 517 (41,5%) su činili aktivni sportisti, a 730 (58,5%) rekreativci. Značajnu većinu u posmatranom uzorku su činili mu&scaron;karci (82,6%), osobe starosti od 16 do 25 godina (62,6%) i normalno uhranjenje osobe (62%). Do povrede prednje ukr&scaron;tene veze do&scaron;lo je kod njih 504 (40,5%) prilikom aktivnog bavljenja sportom, dok su se povrede prilikom rekreativnog bavljenja sportom dogodile kod 741 ispitanika (59,5%). Među aktivnim sportistima, vi&scaron;e od dve trećine se takmičilo na internacionalnom ili republičkom nivou, odnosno u najvi&scaron;im rangovima takmičenja. Kontaktnim kolektivnim sportovima (fudbal, ko&scaron;arka i rukomet) bavilo se 77,9% ispitanika. Nekontaktnim sportovima kao &scaron;to su odbojka, borilački sportovi i skijanje bavilo se 22,1% ispitanika, pri čemu je najveći broj povreda nastao prilikom igranja fudbala (51,3%). Statistički značajno vi&scaron;e povreda (i prilikom aktivnog i prilikom rekreativnog bavljenja sportom) je nastalo bez direktnog kontakta (nekontaktne povrede koje su činile 78,7% povreda), pri čemu je najveći broj povreda nastao usled promene pravca i ritma kretanja. Kod aktivnih sportista najvi&scaron;e povreda dogodilo se na utakmicama (73,8%), slede povrede na treningu (24,1%), dok se na rekreaciji povredilo svega 2,1% ispitanika. Značajno vi&scaron;e povreda dogodilo se na sredini bavljenja sportskom aktivno&scaron;ću (47,4%) u odnosu na povrede na zagrevanju, početku, odnosno kraju sportske aktivnosti. Povrede su značajno če&scaron;će nastajale na travi (42%) i parketu (28%), nego na drugim vrstama podloge. Najveći broj ispitanika povredio se noseći patike prilikom bavljenja sportskom aktivno&scaron;ću. Postoje značajne razlike u kontekstu povređivanja u zavisnosti od pola ispitanika. Žene su u značajno većem procentu povređivane prikom aktivnog bavljenja sportom, dok su se mu&scaron;karci če&scaron;će povređivali na rekreaciji. Žene su se najče&scaron;će povređivale na rukometu, mu&scaron;karci na fudbalu. U odnosu na mu&scaron;karce, kod žena su povrede znatno ređe nastajale prilikom direktnog kontakta, a kad je u pitanju mesto povređivanja, žene su se če&scaron;će nego mu&scaron;karci povređivale na treningu. Preko 50% žena je povređeno na parketu, dok se najveći broj mu&scaron;karaca povredio na travi. Ispitanici sa prekomernom telesnom masom značajno če&scaron;će su se povređivali prilikom rekreacije, dok su se normalno uhranjeni če&scaron;će povređivali prilikom aktivnog bavljenja sportom. Faktori rizika za nastanak povreda prednje ukr&scaron;tene veze su brojni i specifični, odnosno da za svaku populacionu kategoriju postoje rizici, ali se uočava da su u svim sportovima, na svim podlogama i kod svih ispitanika povrede najče&scaron;će nastajale nekontaknim mehanizmom povređivanja. Formiranjem registra povređenih omogućilo bi se bolje razumevanje faktora rizika i njihovog međusobnog uticaja, kao i definisanje profila osoba pod najvećim rizikom za nastanak povrede prednje ukr&scaron;ene veze kolena. Na taj način obezbedile bi se potrebne informacije za planiranje preventivnih programa usmerenih na smanjenje rizika od povređivanja i omogućilo bi se sprovođenje odgovarajućih mera selektivne prevencije.</p> / <p>The study group consisted of 1247 respondents with anterior cruciate ligament injuries who were surgically treated in the period 2012-2017. at the Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology of the Clinical Center of Vojvodina. The objectives of the study were to determine the impact of sports activity levels and injury mechanisms on the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, then the impact of external risk factors (type of sport, competition rank, type of surface, training or match, training period) on the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and the influence of internal risk factors (gender, age, BMI) on the occurrence of injuries of this knee structure. Out of the total number of respondents 517 (41.5%) were active athletes, and 730 (58.5%) were recreational athletes. A significant majority in the observed group were men (82.6%), persons aged 16 to 25 years (62.6%) and normal BMI respondents (62%). Anterior cruciate ligament injury occurred in 504 of them (40.5%) during active sports, while injuries during recreational sports occurred in 741 respondents (59.5%). Among active athletes, more than two thirds competed at the international or national level- in the highest ranks of the competition. Contact collective sports (football, basketball and handball) were practiced by 77.9% of respondents. 22.1% of respondents practiced non-contact sports such as volleyball, martial arts sports and skiing. The largest number of injuries occurring while playing football (51.3%). Statistically significantly more injuries (both during active and recreational sports) occurred without direct contact (noncontact injuries-78,7% of total injuries number), with the largest number of injuries caused by changes in the direction and rhythm of movement. Among active athletes, most injuries occurred in matches (73.8%), followed by injuries in training (24.1%), while only 2.1% of respondents were injured in recreation. Significantly more injuries occurred in the middle of engaging in sports activity (47.4%) compared to injuries during the warm-up, beginning and end of sports activity. Injuries occurred significantly more often on grass (42%) and floor (28%) than on other types of surfaces. Most of the respondents were injured wearing sneakers while doing sports. There are significant differences in the context of injury depending on the gender of the respondents. A significantly higher percentage of women were injured during active sports, while men were more often injured during recreational sport activities. Women were most often injured in handball, men in football. Compared to men, injuries were much less common in women during direct contact, and when it comes to the place of injury, women were injured more often than men during training acitivities. Over 50% of women were injured on the floor, while the largest number of men were injured on the grass. Subjects with overweight were significantly more likely to be injured during recreational sport acitivites, while those with normal BMI were more likely to be injured during active sports. Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries are numerous and specific and there are risks for each population category, but it is noticed that in all sports, on all surfaces and in all subjects, injuries were most often caused by a noncontact injury mechanism. The formation of a Register of injuries would enable a better understanding of risk factors and their mutual influence, as well as the definition of the profile of persons at greatest risk for the occurrence of an anterior cruciate ligament injury. This would provide the necessary information for planning prevention programs aimed at reducing the risk of injury and would enable the implementation of appropriate selective prevention measures.</p>

<p>Kompleksnost visokoenergetskih preloma platoa i pilona tibije i njihova udruženost sa značajnim povredama mekog tkiva oko pripadajućeg zgloba veoma je dobro opisana. Lečenje ima za cilj da multifragmentarni prelomi platoa i pilona tibije postanu stabilni, artikularno poravnani, bezbolni, da koleno i skočni zglob budu pokretni i da se minimizira rizik do nastanka posttraumatskog osteoartritisa. Aparat po Ilizarovu sa nategnutim iglama, koristi opterećenje da stvori jedinstvenu podr&scaron;ku za zglob i stabilnu imobilizacju preloma da se postigne njegovo srastanje. Ovo omogućuje ranu pokretljivost zgloba bez rizika od gubitka redukcije. Cilj istraživanja je procena i poređenje rezultata lečenja unutarzglobnih vi&scaron;ekomadnih preloma kostiju proksimalnog i distalnog okrajka potkolenice tretiranih spoljnjim unilateralnim rigidnim fiksatorom i aparatom po Ilizarovu primenom ASAMI ko&scaron;tanog skoring sistema i funkcionalnog skoring sistema po Karlstrom &ndash; Olerudu.Takođe je jedan od ciljeva istraživanja bio da se uoče faktori koji utiču na različite rezultate lečenja unutarzglobnih vi&scaron;ekomadnih preloma kostiju gornjeg i donjeg okrajka potkolenice tretiranih spoljnim unilateralnim rigidnim fiksatorom i aparatom po Ilizarovu. Istraživanje je dizajnirano kao kontrolisana komparativna klinička studija a podaci su se prikupljali retrospektivno i delom prospektivno na osnovu medicinske dokumentacije od 2008. do 2013. godine. Studija je u potpunosti izvedena na Klinici za ortopediju i traumatologiju Kliničkog centra Vojvodina u Novom Sadu. Studija je obuhvatila ukupno 103 ispitanika kod kojih je u toku 2008 do 2013. godine postavljena dijagnoza unutarzglobnog vi&scaron;ekomadnog preloma gornjeg ili donjeg okrajka tibije. Ispitanici koji su obuhvaćeni ovim kliničkim istraživanjem razvrstani su u tri grupe: Prvu grupu od 53 ispitanika činili su oni sa vi&scaron;ekomadnim unutarzglobnim otvorenim ili zatvorenim prelomima gornjeg ili donjeg okrajka kostiju potkolenice lečenih isključivo spoljnjim unilateralnim rigidnim fiksatorom. Drugu grupu ispitanika, njih 31, činili su oni sa vi&scaron;ekomadnim unutarzglobnim otvorenim ili zatvorenim prelomima gornjeg ili donjeg okrajka kostiju potkolenice lečenih isključivo aparatom po Ilizarovu. Treću grupu činila su 19 ispitanika sa vi&scaron;ekomadnim unutarzglobnim otvorenim ili zatvorenim prelomima gornjeg ili donjeg okrajka kostiju potkolenice koji su lečenje započeli spoljnjim unilateralnim rigidnim fiksatorom, a u kasnijem periodu zbog nastalih komplikacija (lo&scaron;e srastanje, produženo srastanje, nesrastanje, infekcija, pseudoartroza) lečenje nastavili konverzijom spoljnjeg unilateralnog rigidnog fiksatora u aparat po Ilizarovu. Osnovni izvor podataka za prikazano istraživanje bio je protokol formiran za svakog bolesnika pojedinačno, istorije bolesti i poliklinička evidencija. Za potrebe istraživanja dizajniran je protokol istraživanja gde su se prikupljeni podaci analizirali hronolo&scaron;ki : podaci o pacijentu, klinički nalaz na prijemu, postoperativni tok, monitoring aparata, klinički nalaz na otpustu i klinički nalaz na kontrolama od 6, 12 i 18 meseci. Kliničke nalaze na kontrolama na 6, 12 i 18 meseci beležili smo upotrebom skoring sistema ASAMI ( Udruženja za istraživanje i primenu metoda po Ilizarovu) &ndash; za ko&scaron;tane rezultate, i Karlstrom &ndash; Oleruda za procenu funkcionalnih rezultata. Neki do najvažnih rezultata dobijenih prilikom ovog istraživanja jesu da je najbrže vreme srastanja imala grupa Ilizarov, nakon 16&plusmn;2 nedelja. Grupa konverzija zabeležila je prosečno vreme srastanja u 17&plusmn;2 nedelji, dok je kod ispitanika u grupi fiksator zabeženo srastanje u 21&plusmn;4 nedelji. Pojava povr&scaron;nih i dubokih infekcija značajno je veća kod grupe tretiranih spoljnim unilateralnim fiksatorom nego kod grupa tretiranih aparatom po Ilizarovu. Vreme postizanje ranog, punog oslonca na operisani ekstremitet je značajno kraće kod grupe Ilizarov i konverzija nego kod grupe fiksator. Procena ko&scaron;tanih rezultata kori&scaron;ćenjem ASAMI bodovnog sistema ko&scaron;tanog srastanja ukazuje na statistički značajno bolje rezultate kod grupa Ilizarov i konverzija u odnosu na grupu spoljnji fiksator u periodu praćenja i analize na 6,12 i 18 meseci. Funkcionalni rezultati primenom sistema funkcionalne evaluacije po Karlstrom &ndash; Olerudu govore u prilog značajno statistički boljim rezultatima kod grupe Ilizarov i konverzija u odnosu na grupu spoljni fiksator u periodima praćenja i analize na 6,12 i 18 meseci. Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata dolazimo do zaključka da je tretman ispitanika sa multifragmentarnim, intraarikularnim prelomima gornjeg i donjeg okrajka kostiju potkolenice znatno efikasniji aparatom po Ilizarovu &scaron;to sveukupno daje smernice za brži i kvalitetniji oporavak ispitanika i njihov povratak svakodnevnim aktivnostima sa &scaron;to manjim posttraumatskim sekvelama.</p> / <p>The complexity of high-energy fractures of the tibia plateau and pilons and their association with significant violations of the soft tissue around the corresponding joint is well described in the literature. Main aim of the treatment is to multiple fractures of the tibia plateau and pilon become stable, articularly aligned, without pain, and with full motion in the knee and ankle joint with minimum risk for post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Ilizarov apparatus with taut needles is used to create a unique load support for the ankle and create conditions for good healing. This strong stability allows early joint movement, without risk of loss position of fracture parts. The aim of this research is assessment and comparation of the results of treatment, for intraarticular multiple fractures of the proximal and distal part of lower leg tretaed with unilateral external rigid fixator and Ilizarov apparatus, with ASAMI bone scoring system and functional scoring sistem by Karlstrom &ndash; Olerud. One of the goals of the study was to detect factors which affecting different treatment results of the intraarticular multiple fractures of the proximal and distal part of lower leg, tretaed with unilateral external rigid fixator and Ilizarov apparatus. The study was designed as a controlled comparative clinical study and data were collected retrospectively and prospectively form medical records from 2008 to 2013. The study has been fully implemented at the Department for orthopedic surgery and traumatology in the Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad and included 103 patients who had intraarticular multiple fractures of the proximal and distal part of tibia. Subjects covered in this clinical study were classified into three groups: The first group of 53 patients were with intraartiulary multifragmentary open or closed fractures of the upper or distal part of lower leg, treated exclusively with unilateral external rigid fixator. The second group included 31 patients with intraarticular open or closed fractures of the upper or distal lower leg, treated exclusively with Ilizarov apparatus. 19 patients made the third group with intraarticulary open or closed fractures of the upper or distal lower leg, which were treated at the begining with unilateral external rigid fixator and later because of the complications (poor or prolonged healing, nonunion, infection and pseudoarthrosis) tretment was continued by Ilizarov apparatus. The main source of data for this study was protocol wich was established for each patient individually. In this protocol collected data analyzed by date: patient data, clinical findings at admission, postoperative course, monitoring apparatus, clinical findings at discharge and clinical findings at the controls which were at 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery. Clinical findings at control examinations (6, 12 and 18 months after surgery), we recorded by scoring system ASAMI (Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov) - that represent the results of the bone healing, and Karlstrom - Olerud for assessment functional outcomes. The most important results were: the fastest time of bone union was in the group of Ilizarov, and it was after 16 &plusmn; 2 weeks and the third group (conversion group) recorded an average time after 17 &plusmn; 2 weeks, while the patients in the first group (external fixator) had average time of union after 21 &plusmn; 4 week. The appearance of superficial and deep infection was significantly higher in the group treated with unilateral external fixator than in the group treated by the Ilizarov apparatus. Fastest full weight bearing on the injured leg, had patients in the group treated with Ilizarov apparatus. Evaluation of results using bone ASAMI fusion scoring system indicating a statistically significantly better results in the conversion and Ilizarov group compared to the group of external fixator in the period of monitoring at 6,12 and 18 months after surgery. Functional results by Karlstrom - Olerud scoring system show statistically significantly better results in the Ilizarov and conversion group contrary to the external fixator group in periods of monitoring at 6,12 and 18 months. Based on these results we conclude that the treatment of subjects with intraarticulary, multifragmentary fractures of the upper and lower part of the lower leg are more efficient after Ilizarov apparatus which provides overall guidance for faster and better recovery of patients and their return to their daily activities with minimal post-traumatic sequelae.</p>

<p>Osnovni cilj rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena je dobijanje pune stabilnosti kolena u celom obimu pokreta. Bez obzira na razvoj operativne tehnike i rehabilitacije i dalje postoji jedan broj pacijenata koji nije u potpunosti zadovoljan rezultatom rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena, te je potrebno izvr&scaron;iti ponovnu operaciju. Smatra se da je najče&scaron;ći uzrok rane ponovne nestabilnosti lo&scaron;a pozicija kalema, tj. pozicija tunela koja nije na anatomskom mestu. Većina hirurga koji se bave ovom problematikom procenjuju poziciju kalema u golenjači na osnovu standardnih radiograma: prednje-zadnje i bočne projekcije, &scaron;to svakako nije dovoljno precizno. U ekonomski&nbsp; razvijenim zemljama poziciju kalema određuju analizirajući snimke kompjuterizovane tomografije (CT) ili magnetne rezonance (MRI). Prvenstveno zbog smanjenja doze zračenja kojoj se izlažu pacijenti prilikom kompjuterizovane tomografije, ali i iz ekonomskih razloga bilo bi korisno razvijanje jednog lako dostupnog, jeftinog ali preciznog i jednostavnog metoda određivanja položaja kalema u golenjači. Osnovni cilj ovog istraživanja bio je da se dokaže značaj pozicije kalema u golenjači i mogućnost svakodnevne kliničke primene novorazvijenog kompjuterskog programa u cilju određivanja prostorne pozicije kalema u golenjači iz samo dva standardna radiograma. Studija je bila eksperimentalno-prospektivnog karaktera. Eksperimentalni deo istraživanja sproveden je na Fakultetu tehničkih nauka (FTN) u Novom Sadu na Departmanu za proizvodno ma&scaron;instvo gde je na osnovu standardnih RTG snimaka (prednje-zadnje i bočne projekcije) razvijen kompjuterski program za određivanje prostornog položaja kalema u golenjači. U cilju verifikacije novorazvijenog programa realizovano je prostorno određivanje položaja kalema u golenjači obradom standardnih RTG snimaka (prednje-zadnje i bočne projekcije) kod 10 pacijenata kod kojih je izvr&scaron;ena primarna rekonstrukcija prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena. Dobijeni rezultati su upoređeni sa položajem kalema na CT snimcima koji su obezbeđeni za sve pacijente. Na taj način je eksperimentalnim putem utvrđena preciznost novorazvijenog softvera u određivanju prostornog položaja kalema u golenjači. Drugi deo istraživanja bilo je prospektivno kliničko ispitivanje koje je sprovedeno na Klinici za ortopedsku hirurgiju i traumatologiju Kliničkog centra Vojvodine u Novom Sadu. Ispitivanu grupu je činilo 120 pacijenata, oba pola, sa prekidom prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta levog ili desnog kolena. Metodom slučajnog izbora pacijenti su podeljeni u četiri grupe od po 30 pacijenata prema veličini sagitalnog ugla (S) bu&scaron;enja kanala u golenjači (S 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm; i S 70&ordm;-80&ordm;) i prema veličini transverzalnog ugla (T) bu&scaron;enja kanala u golenjači (T 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm; i T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;). Grupa I 30 pacijenata (S 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm; i T 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm;), grupa II 30 pacijenata (S 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm; i T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;), grupa III 30 pacijenata (S 70&ordm;-80&ordm; i T 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm;), grupa IV 30 pacijenata (S 70&ordm;-80&ordm; i T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;). Svi pacijenti su godinu dana nakon operacije pro&scaron;li klinička ispitivanja po bodovnim skalama (Tegner bodovna skala, Lysholm bodovna skala i IKDC standard) i artrometrijska merenja. Rezultati dobijeni merenjem položaja kalema u golenjači, kliničkim ispitivanjima i artrometrijskim merenjima poređani su unutar svake grupe posebno, a izvr&scaron;eno je i poređenje dobijenih rezultata između svih grupa. U ispitivanje su uključeni samo oni pacijenti koji su dali potpisani informisani pristanak da učestvuju u ispitivanju nakon detaljnog upoznavanja sa planiranom procedurom. Svaki pacijent je bio informisan o svrsi i načinu sprovođenja istraživanja, kao i o pregledima i merenjima koja će biti vr&scaron;ena. Statističkom analizom rezultata utvrđeno je da veličina gre&scaron;ke prostornog određivanja položaja kalema u golenjači posle rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena novorazvijenim kompjuterskim programom nije statistički značajna, a kompjutersko određivanje položaja kalema u golenjači omogućava iste rezultate kao i CT snimci. Sumiranjem zaključaka nakon sveobuhvatne analize dobijenih rezultata istraživanja, može se zaključiti da pozicija kalema u golenjači posle rekonstrukcije prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena utiče na postoperativni funkcionalni rezultat.</p> / <p>The main goal of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee is to obtain complete knee stability in the full range of movement. Regardless of the development of operational techniques and rehabilitation, there is still a number of patients who are not completely satisfied with the result of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, and a re-operation is required. It is believed that the most common cause of the instability is the bad position of the graft, i.e. position of the tunnel that is not at the anatomical place insertion. Most surgeons who deal with this problem evaluate the position of the graft in the tibia based on standard radiograms: anterior-posterior and lateral projections, which is not precise enough. In economically developed countries, the position of the graft is determined by analyzing images of computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI). Primarily due to a decrease in the radiation dose exposed to patients during computerized tomography, but also for economic reasons, it would be useful to develop an easily accessible, inexpensive but precise and simple method for determining the position of the graft in the tibia. The main goal of this examination was to prove the significance of the position of the graft and the possibility of daily clinical use of the newly developed computer program in order to determine in-space position of the graft in only two standard radiograms. The study was experimental-prospective. The experimental part of the research was conducted at the Faculty of Technical Sciences (FTN) in Novi Sad at the Department of Production Engineering, where a computer program for determining in-space position of the graft in the tibia was developed on the basis of standard RTG images (anterior-posterior and lateral projections). In order to verify the newly developed program, in-space determination of the position of the graft in the tibia by processing standard RTG images (anterior-posterior and lateral projections) was performed in 10 patients in which the primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament was performed. The obtained results were compared with the position of the grafts on CT images provided to all patients. In this way, the accuracy of newly developed software in determining in-space position of the graft in the tibia was determined experimentally. The second part of the study was a prospective clinical trial conducted at the Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology at the Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad. The investigated group consisted of 120 patients, both sexes, with a break of the anterior cruciate ligament of the left or right knee. By random selection, patients were divided into four groups of 30 patients according to the size of the sagital angle (S) of the tunnel drilling in the tibia (S 60&ordm;-69,9&ordm; and S 70&ordm;-80&ordm;) and according to the transversal angle (T) of the drill tunnel in the tibia ( T 60&ordm;-69.9&ordm; and T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;). Group I 30 patients (S 60&ordm;-69.9&ordm; and T 60&ordm;-69.9&ordm;), group II 30 patients (S 60&ordm;-69.9&ordm; and T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;), group III 30 patients (S 70&ordm;-80&ordm; and T&ordm;60&ordm; -69.9&ordm;), group IV 30 patients (S 70&ordm;-80&ordm; and T 70&ordm;-80&ordm;). All of the patients underwent clinical trials by scales (Tegner score scale, Lysholm score scale and IKDC standard) and arthrometric measurements one year after surgery. The results obtained by measuring the position of the graft in the tibia, clinical trials and arthrometric measurements were classified separately in each group, and obtained results were compared between all groups. The study included only those patients who gave signed informed consent to participate in the study after being thoroughly informed about planned procedure. Each patient was informed about the purpose and method of conducting the research, as well as the examinations and measurements to be performed. Statistical analysis of the results showed that the size of the error in measuring in-space determination of the position of the graft in tibia after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee by a newly developed computer program was not statistically significant, and the computer determination of the position of the graft in the tibia provides the same results as the CT images. Summarizing the conclusions after a comprehensive analysis of the obtained results of the study, it can be concluded that the position of the graft in tibia after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament affects the postoperative functional result.</p>

<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Author>Windows User</o:Author> <o:Version>12.00</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp/> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/> <w:Word11KerningPairs/> <w:CachedColBalance/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true" DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/> </w:LatentStyles></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]><style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin-top:0in;mso-para-margin-right:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-para-margin-left:0in;line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}</style><![endif]-->Uvod: Traumatsko moždano o&scaron;tećenje (TMO) predstavlja globalni zdravstveni problem koji pogađa oko 10 miliona ljudi godi&scaron;nje &scaron;irom sveta. Te&scaron;ka traumatska moždana o&scaron;tećenja (TTMO) čine 10% svih TMO i imaju visoku stopu mortaliteta i neizvestan oporavak. Ranije prepoznavanje sistemskih faktora koji utiču na ishod lečenja može da ima značajan uticaj na pravovremeno započinjanje terapijskih mera i smanjivanje morbiditeta i mortaliteta. Cilj istraživanja: Identifikovati sistemske faktore koji imaju značajan uticaj na ishod lečenja povređenih sa TTMO u Jedinici intenzivnog lečenja (JIL) tokom prvog dana hospitalizacije. Metodologija: Ispitivanje je sprovedeno kao retrospektivno-prospektivna studija koja je obuhvatila 115 povređenih ispitanika sa TTMO koji su hospitalizovani u JIL Urgentnog centra Kliničkog centra Vojvodine (UC KCV) u periodu od 1.01.2014.-1.10.2017. Iz medicinske dokumentacije, za svakog ispitanika uključenog u istraživanje su uzeti u razmatranje i analizu sledeći parametri u toku prvih 24 časa od momenta prijema u JIL: demografske i op&scaron;te karakteristike ispitanika od značaja za istraživanje i sistemski prediktivni faktori (sistolni i srednji arterijski pritisak- SAP/MAP, glikemija-&Scaron;UK, telesna temperatura-TT, pH, parcijalni pritisak kiseonika-PaO2 i parcijalni pritisak ugljem dioksida- PaCO2) registrovani u pet vremenskih tačaka (0h, 6h, 12h,18h, 24h). Svi gore navedeni podaci su posmatrani i analizirani kao prediktorski faktori tj. nezavisne varijable u odnosu na zavisnu varijablu &bdquo;ishod lečenja&ldquo; definisanu kao Glazgovska skala ishoda (Glasgow outcome scale-GOS) nakon otpusta povređenih iz JIL na Kliniku za neurohirurgiju KCV i GOS nakon otpusta iz Klinike za neurohirurgiju KCV i &bdquo;tok lečenja&ldquo; definisan kroz dužinu boravka povređenih u JIL UC KCV, dužinu boravka na Klinici za neurohirurgiju KCV, odnosno ukupno trajanje hospitalizacije u KCV, kao i otpust kući ili u odgovarajući rehabilitacioni centar. Statistička analiza je izvr&scaron;ena pomoću statističkog paketa IBM SPSS 23. Podaci su predstavljeni tabelarno i grafički, a statistička značajnost određivana je na nivou p &lt; 0,05. Prikupljeni podaci su obrađeni adekvatnim statističkim metodima. Rezultati: Sistemski faktori koji su se izdvojili kao prediktori smrtnog ishoda (GOS 1) kod povređenih sa TTMO tokom prvog dana boravka u JIL su upotreba vazoaktivne potpore i glikemija. Upotreba vazoaktivne potpore povećava verovatnoću za smrtni ishod 4,7 puta (OR=0,214; 95%CI: 0,096-0,479; p&lt;0,05). i vrednosti glikemije &gt; 10 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću za smrtni ishod u nultom satu (OR= 0,240, 95%CI: 0,087-0,662; p=0,05) i u 24 satu (OR=0,206, 95%CI: 0,037 &ndash; 0,929; p=0,05). Sa svakim porastom telesne temperature za jednu jedinicu u posmatranom intervalu raste verovatnoća za pozitivan ishod (OR =2,118 , 95%CI: 1,097 &ndash; 4,091; p&lt;0,05) i vrednosti glikemije u intervalu od 4-8 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću za pozitivan ishod 2,5 puta. Sistemski faktori koji su se izdvojili u smislu predikcije ishoda lečenja ispitanika nakon otpusta iz JIL su vrednosti glikemije i telesna temperatura. Vrednost glikemije na prijemu u intervalu od 6,9 do 7,4 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću boljeg oporavka (GOS 4-5 vs. GOS 2-3). Niže vrednosti glikemiije u narednim vremenskim tačkama (6h, 12h, 18h) takođe povećavaju verovatnoću za bolji oporavak. Ukoliko je telesna temperatura u 6-om i 12-om satu, vi&scaron;a od 36,5 &deg;C veća je verovatnoća za bolji neurolo&scaron;ki oporavak, prilikom otpusta iz JIL, odnosno Klinike za neurohirurgiju KCV. Ispitanici koji su imali vi&scaron;e vrednosti telesne temperature su imali duže trajanje hospitalizacije (OR=4,096; 95%CI; 0,709-7,483;p&lt;0,05). Na dužinu boravka u JIL, kao i na otpust kući ili odgovarajući rehabilitacioni centar nije imao uticaj nijedan posmatrani sistemski faktor. Zaključak: Sistemski prediktivni faktori toka i ishoda lečenja povređenih sa TTMO su upotreba vazoaktivne potpore, glikemija i telesna temperatura.</p> / <p>Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health problem that affects about 10 million people worldwide annually. Severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) account for 10% of all TBI and has high morbidity and unreliable recovery. Early recognition of systemic factors that affect the treatment outcome can have a significant impact on the timely initiation of therapeutic measures and the reduction of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the research: to identify systemic factors that have a significant impact on the treatment outcome of the STBI patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the first day of hospitalization. Methodology: The study was conducted as a retrospective-prospective study that included 115 injured patients with STBI who were hospitalized in the ICU, Emergency Center (EC) of the Clinical Center of Vojvodina (CCV) in the period from 01.01.2014 to 1.10.2017. From the medical documentation, for each participant involved in the research, the following parameters within the first 24 hours after the admission were considered and analyzed: demographic and general characteristics of the participants of importance for research and systemic predictive factors (systolic and mean arterial pressure-SAP / MAP, glycemia, body temperature -TT, pH, partial pressure of oxygen-PaO2 and partial pressure of carbon dioxide-PaCO2) registered at five time points (0h, 6h, 12h,18h, 24h). All of the above data were observed and analyzed as predictors, ie, independent variables in relation to the dependent variable &quot;treatment outcome&quot; defined as the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after the transfer from the ICU to the Clinic of neurosurgery of the CCV and GOS after discharge from a Clinic of neurosurgery and &quot;treatment course&quot; defined by length of stay in ICU, or the total duration of hospitalization in CCV, as well as the release to the home or the appropriate rehabilitation center. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 23 statistical package. The data are presented in tables and graphs, and the statistical significance was determined at p &lt;0.05. The collected data were processed with adequate statistical methods. Results: Systemic factors that had predictive value for the lethal outcome (GOS 1) in STBI during the first day of ICU stay were the use of vasopressors and glycemia. The use of vasopressors increases the likelihood of fatal outcome 4.7 times (OR= 0,214; 95%CI: 0,096-0,479; p&lt;0,05) and glycemic values &gt; 10 mmol/l increase the likelihood of fatal outcome on admission (OR=0,240, 95%CI: 0,087-0,662; p=0,05) and after 24 hours (OR=0,206, 95%CI: 0,037 &ndash; 0,929; p=0,05). With each increase in body temperature for one unit in the observed interval, the probability of a positive outcome increases (OR=2,118, 95%CI: 1,097 &ndash; 4,091;p&lt;0,05) and glycemic values in the range 4-8 mmol/l increase the probability of a positive outcome 2.5 times. Systemic factors that predict the treatment outcome of the patients after their discharge from ICU are glycemia and body temperature. The blood sugar on admission in the ICU in the range from 6.9 to 7.4 mmol/l increases the opportunity of a better recovery (GOS 4-5 vs. GOS 2-3). Lower glycemic values at the next time points (6h, 12h, 18h) also increase the opportunity of a better recovery. If the body temperature in the 6th and 12th-hour postadmission is higher than 36.5&deg; C, the greater opportunity for better neurological improvement when the patient is discharged from ICU, or from the Clinic of neurosurgery. Participants who had higher values of body temperature had a longer duration of hospitalization (OR 4.096; 95% CI; 0.709-7.483;p&lt;0,05). The length of the stay in ICU, as well as the release to the home or the appropriate rehabilitation center, was not affected by any observed systemic factor. Conclusion: Systemic predictive flow factors and outcome of treatment factors with STBI use of vasopressors, glycemia and body temperature.</p>