This qualitative single case study in a rural start-up charter school in North Louisiana explored the impact that professional learning from Whole-Faculty Study Group sessions had on teachers understanding of the most significant contributions of the Standards for Mathematical Practice in preparation of the implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). The theoretical framework proposed that structured time for collaboration would enhance teachers understanding of the math practice standards. The literature indicated that collaborative job-embedded professional learning can lead to improvements in teachers knowledge and practice and that understanding the Standards for Mathematical Practice is key to the successful implementation of the content standards. According to the interview and questionnaire responses from the six teachers and leadership team members who participated in this study, along with an analysis of records and observation notes, participants collaborative professional learning in the study group sessions had a positive impact on their understanding of the value of collaboration and their perceived importance of the math practice standards. Themes about collaboration that emerged from the data analysis indicated that the purpose of collaboration was to empower teachers and establish common goals and that successful collaboration requires structures in place and supportive resources. Themes that emerged about the math practice standards were that the standards develop mathematically proficient students, deepen teachers mathematical knowledge, and change the teacher and student roles, with teachers assuming a more facilitative role and students taking a more active role in their own learning. The findings were supported by the literature, with the caveat that the scope of the study precluded following teachers as they applied their deeper understanding of the math practice standards to implementing the standards. Recommendations emphasize ensuring that CCSSM implementation leads to significant changes in teacher practice and student learning and that educators at all levels have the time and support they need work together collaboratively. Further research suggested includes expanding this study, more research on the impact of job-embedded teacher collaboration on teacher practice and student learning, and more research on implementing the CCSSM standards and assessments and assessing the results.

In this dissertation, I describe a narrative study in which five pre-service and in-service teachers read and re-read three young adult memoirs and discussed their responses in a series of book group meetings. The purpose was to examine how teachers discuss young adult memoirs, what they might learn about themselves in the process of reading and reflecting in book discussions and in a Commonplace Book they kept, and how they might use young adult memoirs in classrooms including, but not limited to English language arts (ELA) classrooms. Data was collected through transcribing a series of book group meetings, as well as collecting a set of books into which the participants logged their responses. Following the completion of the book group meetings, I conducted individual interviews with each participant. I found that the participants were willing to make personal and pedagogical connections to each text, but that including the texts in their curricula presented several obstacles. Nevertheless, I found that using a book group in teacher education research to be an efficient and effective way to answer multiple complex, qualitative research questions at one time in a semi-structured setting, low-risk setting

No description available.

No description available.

Ecological literacy in students has become an increasing concern for educators. Mounting environmental problems along with a growing amount of nature deficit disorder seen in children and adults alike provides the impetus for research in this area. Since many college biology classes are modeled around the same style and emphasis found in the textbooks used for those courses, this provided an avenue for an examination of these materials. This research involved the selection of five popular introductory, college-level biology textbooks for analysis. Three rubrics were created to assess the graphical components of the introductory and ecology chapters in each textbook. The Systems-based Rubric (SR) was created to quantitatively assess the systems-based components of each graphic. The Tuftian Rubric (TR) was created to assess how well graphics comply with Tuftian rules of good graphics. The Ethnographic Systems-based Rubric (ESR) was created to qualitatively assess the systems-based nature of each graphic. The results of this analysis revealed that all of the textbooks examined, based upon analyzed graphics, could be classified as strongly Tuftian in nature. The results of this analysis also suggested that none of the textbooks assessed could be quantitative nor could they be qualitatively classified as strongly systems-based. Even when examining individual chapters of each book, all of the chapters were classified quantitatively and qualitatively as primarily reductionistic.

The Issue: The integration of evidence into practice is a complex process. Facilitation is a strategy that may assist practitioners with enhancing evidence uptake in nursing practice. However, the concept is not well understood from a front-line nursing perspective. Thesis Objectives: To describe facilitation in moving evidence into nursing practice and determine the nature of the facilitator role and the process of facilitation in theory and from actual experience to develop a conceptual framework to guide practitioners. Methods: A descriptive design utilizing mixed methods was employed: 1) Focused review of the literature that synthesized the current state of knowledge on facilitation as role and process in the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing. 2) Case audit and focus group interview with facilitators of cases involved in adapting guidelines and planning for implementation. A provisional framework was developed based on the literature review which guided the case audit and focus group interview. The data from the literature was integrated with data from those actively involved in facilitation to refine the framework. Results: Focused literature review: A final set of 39 papers were identified. Facilitation is described as supporting and enabling practitioners to improve practice through evidence implementation. Certain aspects of the role and the strategies being employed to promote change are evident. Current literature reveals that facilitation is viewed as an individual role as well as a process involving individuals and groups. Case audit and focus group interview: Forty-six discrete, practical facilitation activities discovered in the literature were in large part found as occurring within the cases. An additional 5 new, distinct activities related to facilitation were found in the case documentation. Findings suggest that facilitation is a multifaceted process and a team effort. Communication and relationship-building are key elements. Conclusion: The transparency and detail displayed in the revised framework may contribute to systematically developing, implementing, and testing facilitation interventions in nursing contexts. Facilitation is clearly an important strategy to advance EBP and the improved understanding of facilitation offered in this thesis provides a guiding framework for future investigations of evidence implementation where facilitation is a key element. / Thesis (Master, Nursing) -- Queen's University, 2009-07-30 15:13:59.116

This thesis analyses transformations in pediatrics during its history as an organized medical specialty. Pediatricians emerged in a period of high infant and child mortality and poor public health to fight disease and treat difficult feeding problems. After mortality rates began to decline they turned to prevention, supervising the normal growth and development of healthy children. However, as prevention absorbed an ever larger proportion of their time, they became bored and dissatisfied. During the 1970s, competing groups of child health care providers such as pediatric nurse practitioners and family practitioners exacerbated pediatricians' difficulties. Worried about their possible disappearance as primary care specialists, pediatricians sought a new mission in ministering to children's non-physical problems. The "new pediatrics" focuses on the behavioral and psychosocial problems of children and adolescents. This study contributes to understanding how professions respond to changes and threats in their environment.

Informal science education centers, including aquariums, are often tasked with educating the general public on conservation issues, natural environments, and general science topics. The public tends to see these centers as entertaining leisure destinations in which they have the opportunity to learn something about the presented information. It is widely accepted that learning in informal environments is shaped by the learners motivations, interests, background knowledge, and social interactions. However, these impacting factors are rarely studied in depth, particularly across different types of visitors. This qualitative case study project integrates original research on visitor interests, motivations, and self-reported learning into the design of an educational material that provides visitors with guidance but still aligns with the free-choice nature of the aquarium. To determine visitor motivations, interests, and self-reported learning, the researcher interviewed 122 visitors to an aquarium; these visitors encompassed a variety of group types. Information from this phase was used to create two novel, unique sets of educational materialsthe Visitors Interpersonal (VIP) Discussion Guidesthat contained open-ended questions designed to spark science-based conversations among family groups with elementary school-aged children (n=6) and social groups of college-aged young adults (n=7). Interviews, observations, and document analyses allowed the researcher to assess the impact of VIP Discussion Guides use on the groups visit experience and science-based conversations. Use of the VIP Discussion Guides increased the number and depth of science-based conversations among family groups with elementary school-aged children as well as among social groups of college-aged young adults. Visitors reported greater engagement in conversations and increased learning due to use of the VIP Discussion Guides. Additionally, all participating visitors stated that they enjoyed using the VIP Discussion Guides and would be interested in using a similar guide in the future. The results from qualitative studies typically do not generalize to different situations, but the methods, VIP Discussion Guides, and conclusions from this research could provide a blue-print for other institutions seeking to design educational materials to increase science-based conversations among their own visitors.

Collaboration is neither the ethos, nor the experience, of most professionals in health care. Nevertheless, the concept of collaboration has become increasingly popular in recent years, promising to enhance all aspects of work, academic, and political life. And while collaboration is a significant and complex phenomenon, it has not been clearly understood for its impact on health care professionals and their work, or for the factors that influence its success or failure. The purpose of the study was to explore the meaning of collaboration, as conveyed by the lived experience of health care professionals, as well as the interpersonal and interactional determinants and their impact on the outcomes of their collaboration. The conceptual paradigm of phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenological methods guided the research. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 health care professionals engaged in interprofessional practice in a novel community-based geriatric care program. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Ricoeur’s procedural steps were used to analyze the transcripts. Acquiring the ‘real world’ experiences of health care professionals enabled the emergence of six themes: engaging in collective thinking and action to produce best outcomes and optimize clients’ health; responding to collaboration for self and other members as a continued work in progress; experiencing the personal and professional rewards as markers of success with collaboration; existing challenges create barriers that impede collaboration; experiencing the interactional dynamics of collaboration and their influences requires the interpersonal attributes of quality communication, openness, trust, and respect; and forming a common vision is necessary for collaboration but difficult to achieve. The findings of this study suggest that collaboration is a genuinely experiential phenomenon: it is a human process that requires leadership on the part of all health care professionals to negotiate and agree upon the processes that will enhance their relationships and are necessary for collaboration to unfold. This study produced a number of recommendations that can be offered to multiple stakeholders in the geriatric care setting, as well as extended to those in the other domains of health care.

There is a paucity of research about the uptake and utilisation of antenatal care by pregnant adolescents in New Zealand. Media coverage, public perceptions and societal values often presume that adolescents when compared to other women, generally initiate antenatal care if at all and have adverse outcomes related to pregnancy, such as low birth weight and preterm deliveries compared to other woman. This research aims to assess the variations that may exist in the utilisation of and outcomes from antenatal care maternity services for adolescents compared to the pregnant adult population in Christchurch, between 1st July 2004 and the 30th June 2005.