本研究旨在探討臺北市國民中學校長領導風格、教師知識管理與學校效能之關係。採用問卷調查法進行研究，以97學年度臺北市公立國民中學教師為研究對象，各校依班級數多寡，選取8至16位教師進行問卷調查，總計發出問卷750份，回收問卷663份，問卷回收率88.4%，有效樣本620份。所得資料輸入電腦後，以SPSS for Windows 12.0版統計套裝軟體進行統計分析。採用平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法加以處理，獲致如下之結論： 一、臺北市國民中學校長領導風格中，轉型領導較注重「願景」；交易領導較注重「介入管理」；教師知識管理，較注重「知識取得」及與「知識創新」；學校效能整，較注重「社區關係」及「學生表現」 二、臺北市國民中學校長領導風格之現況受性別、服務年資、擔任職務、學校規模、學校歷史影響有所差異；教師知識管理受性別、年齡、教育程度、服務年資、擔任職務、學校歷史影響有所差異；學校效能受性別、年齡、服務年資、擔任職務、學校規模、學校歷史影響而有所差異。 三、校長領導風格愈佳則教師知識管理愈佳；教師知識管理愈佳則學校效能愈佳 四、校長領導風格各層面對學校效能之預測力，以「激勵」最具有預測力 五、教師知識管理各層面對學校效能之預測力，以「知識取得」最具有預測 依據本研究之結論，提出下列建議： 一、對教育行政機關的建議 (一)加強校長之專業發展，強化校長專業領導能力 (二)針對校長培育課程增列轉型領導概念課程 (三)針對教師增列知識管理研習課程、提升知識管理能力 二、對校長的建議 (一)應增進校長轉型領導的運用，以提升學校效能 (二)少使用法職權、多用專業與熱忱帶領學校組織 三、對教師的建議 (一)、增進教師間的交流平台，提昇教育專業知識分享 (二)、教師應積極參加研習活動、多方請益，以提昇教師專業知能 四、對學校的建議 (一)、建置硬體設備及設計相關課程，提供有利於教師知識管理的情境 (二)、推動學校教師知識管理，營造知識分享的學校文化，以提昇學校效能 / The purpose of this research is to explore the relationship among principals’ leadership style, teachers’ knowledge management and the school effectiveness of the municipal junior high schools in Taipei. The research was conducted through questionnaire survey. The participants were the teachers in Taipei municipal junior high schools in academic year 2009. 8 to 16 teachers were selected from each school according to the class number of the schools. 750 questionnaires were issued, and a total of 663 questionnaires were collected from all the target schools, with the rate of retrieval, 88.4%. 620 copies were valid samples. The research data acquired was processed by SPSS for Windows 10.0 version and analyzed with average mean, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. Based on the results, the following conclusions were reached: 1.In Taipei municipal junior high schools, principals’ transformational leadership pays more attention to the “vision” field; while principals’ transactional leadership emphasizes more on the “interference management” field. Besides, “knowledge acquisition” and “knowledge innovation” are more valued among the knowledge management conducted by the teachers. In the aspect of school effectiveness, “community relationship” and “student achievements” are more emphasized. 2.In Taipei municipal junior high schools, principals’ leadership styles are verified with the influence of teachers’ gender, seniority, position, school scale, and school history. Teachers’ knowledge management is verified with the influence of teachers’ gender, age, education background, seniority, position, and school history. And the school effectiveness is verified with the influence of teachers’ gender, age, seniority, position, school scale, and school history. 3.The better principals’ leadership style is, the better teachers’ knowledge management is. The better teachers’ knowledge management is, the better school effectiveness is. 4.“Encouragement” is the best way to enhance the predictions of principals’ leadership style on school effectiveness. 5.“”Knowledge acquisition” is the best way to enhance the predictions of teachers’ knowledge management on school effectiveness. According to the findings, some suggestions were made: 1. Suggestions for education and administration institutes 1) Strengthen principals’ professional development and leadership. 2) Integrate courses about transformational leadership into principal preparation curriculum. 3) Arrange more workshops or seminars about knowledge management for teachers and upgrade teachers’ knowledge management ability. 2. Suggestions for principals 1) Develop principals’ transformational leadership and thus improve school effectiveness. 2) Make use of less authority but more profession and enthusiasm on school leading. 3. Suggestions for teachers 1) Enhance the communication among teachers; increase opportunities to share and exchange educational knowledge. 2) Be active in participating in seminars or workshops, listen to good advice, and upgrade teachers’ professional knowledge. 4. Suggestions for schools 1) Construct hardware facilities, design correlated curriculum, and offer the circumstances which are helpful for teachers’ knowledge management. 2) Promote teachers’ knowledge management, build a knowledge-sharing atmosphere at school, and thus enhance school effectiveness.

本研究旨在瞭解基隆市高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理之現況，並分析教師人口變項、教師危機管理變項、學校環境變項在校長領導風格以及校園危機管理的差異情形，最後探討校長領導風格與校園危機管理之關係。 本研究以問卷調查法為主，半結構訪談為輔。問卷調查法以「高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理調查問卷」(內含基本資料、校長領導風格量表與校園危機管理量表)為工具，以基隆市高級中等學校教師為研究對象，分層隨機抽取11所學校，共發出問卷330份，回收272份，有效問卷272份，有效回收率為82.4％。所得資料以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析與 Scheff'e事後比較、 Pearson's積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。並依正式問卷調查的結果，歸納相關的問題，設計並確定訪談大綱，做為訪談的依據，實地訪談2位校長，以釐清及延續問卷調查之結果，並藉由整理訪談文字資料、編碼歸類整理，綜合問卷調查與訪談資料，進行研究結果的分析與討論。研究結論如下： 壹、基隆市高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理之現況， 均屬良好程度。 貳、教師不同性別、服務年資、最高學歷對校長領導風格各個層 面之感受，並無顯著不同；教師不同性別、服務年資、最高 學歷在校園危機管理各個層面的感知上，並無顯著不同。 参、主任在校長領導風格與校園危機管理之感知上較好。 肆、教師是否參與危機研習、處理危機經驗、成立危機小組在校 園危機管理之整體及各個層面的感知上，並無顯著不同。 伍、學校規模不同的教師在校長領導風格及校園危機管理之感 受，並無顯著不同。 陸、創校歷史在「21~50年」及「51年以上」之教師對校長領導風 格及校園危機管理之感受，較「10年以下」之教師感受深刻。 柒、校長領導風格與校園危機管理間，有顯著的正相關。 捌、校長領導風格對整體校園危機管理具有預測力。 最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、高級中等學校校長、相關行政人員以及未來研究的參考。 / This study aims to investigate the current development of principals’ leadership style and crisis management in Keelung high schools and to analyze the differences in teachers personal variables、teachers’ crisis management and school environmental variables. concerning principals’ leadership style and crisis management. Finally, it explores the relationship between principals’ leadership style and crisis management. This study employs the research method of questionnaire surveys and semi structured interviews. There were two survey tools used in the study, including Principals’ Leadership Style Questionnaire and Crisis Management Questionnaire. Three hundred and thirty subjects are randomly selected from eleven high schools in Keelung city. A total of 272 questionnaires was returned. Out of those, 82.4% was valid (272 out of 330). Valid sample data was analyzed and processed using the methods of description statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA. Scheff’e posteriority comparison, Pearson's product-moment correlation and stepwise multiple regressions. The frame of the interview questions was designed according to the findings from the questionnaire. Two principals, were interviewed to clarify and extend the findings of the survey. Then. the data retrieved from questionnaires and interviews were compiled, categorized, synthesized and analyzed. Following is the summary of the study: 1. The current development of principals’ leadership style and the crisis management in high schools are both above the average. 2. There is no significant difference in teachers’ experiences of principals’ leadership style in terms of gender, seniority and educational background; and, there is no significant difference in teachers recognition about crisis management in terms of teachers gender, seniority, educational background. 3. Teacher to act as director in schools give better recognition in principals’ leadership style; and, teacher to act as director in schools give better recognition in the crisis management. 4. There is no significant difference in teachers’ experiences about crisis management in terms of crisis study, crisis experience, and crisis management team background. 5. There is no significant difference in both principals’ leadership style and crisis management to teachers from schools of different scales. 6. There are significant differences in both principals’ leadership style and crisis management to teachers from schools of different history. 7. It shows significant positive correlation between principals’ leadership style and crisis management. 8. Principals’ leadership style demonstrates the predictability of crisis management in high schools in Keelung city. This study is finalized at proposing practical suggestions based on the findings and conclusions to educational administration authorities, high principals, the director of schools and faculty for further study and reference.