No description available.

A key part of the transformation process of the Czechoslovak economy in the post-revolution period was privatization. It was an extraordinary and unique process of transfer of state property to private purchasers, which in terms of its scope and level of difficulty, not only historically unprecedented in the CR. Evaluation of the privatization process is still today the subject of the current discourse of ideas. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of the privatization process of the Czechoslovak economy in the transition period and comparing this process with similar processes in other transition economies. Evaluated are individual partial privatization methods, as well as the privatization process as a whole. Attention is given to voucher privatization, its importance and status. Evaluated is the financial sector privatization, especially privatization of major banks. At the end is made final conclusion which is accompanied by a self-evaluation.

The Czech Republic went through transformation of economy in the 90s. The key part of this proces was privatisation. It became the most important political economy proces in the history of the Czech Republic. The privatisation proces especially the nonstandard voucher privatisation is still important topic of public, politics and economic discussion. Purpose of this thesis is to evaulate the privatisation proces in the terms of its revenues and costs. The first chapter is focused on the economic history of privatisation ideas and its use in political practice. The main part is devoted to the analysis of the privatization process in the Czech Republic. Evaluated are the various methods of privatisation and the process as a whole. The final two chapters are focused on the comparison of the Czech privatization processes with the same processes in Hungary and Poland. Evaluated is the speed of the privatization process, the fiscal impacts and impact on the development of selected macroeconomic indicators. The working hypothesis was confirmed: The proceeds of the privatization process exceeded its costs.

The 90th years were a period of tranzition of Czech economy, whose a key part was the privatization. Specific initial situation of the Czech / Czechoslovak economy was the decisive point to choose historically quite unique privatization strategy of combining standard and nonstandard methods of privatization. This strategy would imply a number of advantages, but also some concerns. Particularly the use of previously untested voucher privatization brought some concern about potential negative impacts. The aim of this thesis is to evaluate the benefits and costs of the transformation privatization. It will be evaluated the privatization process itself as well as its longer impacts. Special attention is paid to the privatization of large state banks. In conclusion, partial results are summarized and it is said an overall assessment of privatization.

No description available.

No description available.

Privatization as the main attribute of transformation process brought benefits and costs; benefits in the form of speed, social justice, reduce abuse of political power and finally privatization of 60% of all businesses and the costs called by its critics as "tunneling of the state." The objective of this dissertation is to compare these revenues and costs and answer to the question whether we can consider the process of Czechoslovakia, respectively Czech privatization in the 1990s as successful. The main determinants of this process was not only the starting conditions, but even then the legal environment and the offered possibilities of privatization. The basic method of this thesis is the analysis of revenues and expenses. For the more objective evaluation I will use a comparison of the results of other emerging countries. Specifically, I will focus on Poland and Hungary, whose starting conditions are deemed as most comparable to ours.

The thesis compares particular privatization methods in the USSR/the Russian Federation and the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic/the Czech Republic. It compares "small privatization", "big privatization" and mass privatization methods.

Cílem této práce je hlubší zamyšlení nad problematikou poskytování dotací českému ocelářskému průmyslu v době transformace České republiky. Toto období bylo pro dané odvětví značně problematické a zažilo od roku 1989 mnoho změn, které dále ovlivnily budoucí vývoj tohoto tradičního odvětví českého průmyslu. Hlavní oblastí zájmu této práce je především restrukturalizace a privatizace českého ocelářství období konce 90. let minulého století, které lze spojovat se značnou dotační aktivitu v rámci dané oblasti. Tato studie si dále klade za cíl popsat a zhodnotit postupy a dotační aktivity státních úředníků v rámci zkoumané problematiky.

Práce se zabývá fenoménem globalizace. Hledá odpověď na otázky: Kdo je beneficientem tohoto procesu a za jakých okolností? Kdo na něj doplácí a dotuje ho? Východiskem je zejména sociologicko-ekonomický kontext, který poukazuje na rozporuplnost tohoto procesu, během kterého nadnárodní koncerny získaly značný vliv, kterým ovlivňují světovou ekonomiku a nutí státy přizpůsobovat se jejich požadavkům. Pozornost věnuje dopadu symbiotického působení firem globálního významu a institucí jako Světová obchodní organizace, Mezinárodní měnový fond či Světová banka na své okolí v nejširším smyslu slova. Dále se zabývá nástroji, kterými lze chování globálních hráčů usměrňovat.