The diploma thesis presents current ideas and relevant psychological theories in the field of fairness and perceived justice, and in such context, it analyzes the mediation process, especially the process of court-initiated mediation in the Czech Republic as an alternative conflict resolution method. Moreover, the thesis aims to provide information on the attitudes of different public representatives to the court-initiated mediation, with special regard to the perception of fairness and justice of the mediation process and its outcome. The empirical part of the thesis introduces an attitudes research of various public representatives to the court-initiated mediation. The research proved a statistically significant difference in attitudes towards fairness and perceived justice of mediation among observed groups of attorneys, junior attorneys, mediators, judges, mediators with attorney license, and a group of other professions. Among the specific groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups of attorneys and mediators, attorneys and mediators with attorney license, and finally between the groups of attorneys and the group of other professions. The research data were collected through the newly developed attitude Questionnaire of Perceived Justice of Mediation (DVSM)....

Droughts are occurring globally and should be recognized as a global issue and drought planning should use a proactive approach on the part of the world community. However, much drought planning, even in developed and highly developed countries, is reactive and programs are often poorly coordinated sometimes with unforeseen negative consequences for marginalized and disenfranchised populations. Literature pertaining to planning strategy for existing, drought crises is nominal and often contributes to patterns of reactiveness and resulting inequity. To gain a better understanding of crisis-driven planning and the participatory process, this gap was viewed through the lenses of institutional analysis and development and procedural justice and fairness. Specifically, this study was designed to determine how procedural justice and fairness, and the institutional analysis and development framework delineates participatory roles during reactive, crisis-driven planning versus proactive, preparedness planning. A multi-case/within-case analysis was conducted. Six publicly-available documents were selected using provisional and sequence coding lists; emerging themes were also identified at this time. The within-case analysis showed discernable differences between reactive and proactive participatory processes. These findings were used to conduct a cross-case analysis; this analysis indicated that commitment to the participatory process and to change were the keys elements in producing fair and just policies. Drought events can be widely divergent and dynamic, no two being alike; however, the spirit of procedural justice must be part of governance that brings public participation within the reactive planning process into better alignment with proactive planning.