abstract: This thesis addresses the following fundamental maximum throughput routing problem: Given an arbitrary edge-capacitated n-node directed network and a set of k commodities, with source-destination pairs (s_i,t_i) and demands d_i> 0, admit and route the largest possible number of commodities -- i.e., the maximum throughput -- to satisfy their demands. The main contributions of this thesis are three-fold: First, a bi-criteria approximation algorithm is presented for this all-or-nothing multicommodity flow (ANF) problem. This algorithm is the first to achieve a constant approximation of the maximum throughput with an edge capacity violation ratio that is at most logarithmic in n, with high probability. The approach used is based on a version of randomized rounding that keeps splittable flows, rather than approximating those via a non-splittable path for each commodity: This allows it to work for arbitrary directed edge-capacitated graphs, unlike most of the prior work on the ANF problem. The algorithm also works if a weighted throughput is considered, where the benefit gained by fully satisfying the demand for commodity i is determined by a given weight w_i>0. Second, a derandomization of the algorithm is presented that maintains the same approximation bounds, using novel pessimistic estimators for Bernstein's inequality. In addition, it is shown how the framework can be adapted to achieve a polylogarithmic fraction of the maximum throughput while maintaining a constant edge capacity violation, if the network capacity is large enough. Lastly, one important aspect of the randomized and derandomized algorithms is their simplicity, which lends to efficient implementations in practice. The implementations of both randomized rounding and derandomized algorithms for the ANF problem are presented and show their efficiency in practice. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Computer Science 2020

The goal of this thesis is to study the complexity of NP-Hard problems, using the Max-Cut and the Max-k-Cut problems, and the study of fitness landscapes. The Max-Cut and Max-k-Cut problems are well studied NP-hard problems specially since the approximation algorithm of Goemans and Williamson (1995) which introduced the use of SDP to solve relaxed problems. In order to prove the existence of a performance guarantee, the rounding step from the SDP solution to a Max-Cut solution is simple and randomized. For the Max-k-Cut problem, there exist several approximation algorithms but many of them have been proved to be equivalent. Similarly as in Max-Cut, these approximation algorithms use a simple randomized rounding to be able to get a performance guarantee. Ignoring for now the performance guarantee, one could ask if there is a rounding process that takes into account the structure of the relaxed solution since it is the result of an optimization problem. In this thesis we answered this question positively by using clustering as a rounding method. In order to compare the performance of both algorithms, a series of experiments were performed using the so-called G-set benchmark for the Max-Cut problem and using the Random Graph Benchmark of Goemans1995 for the Max-k-Cut problem. With this new rounding, larger cut values are found both for the Max-Cut and the Max-k-Cut problems, and always above the value of the performance guarantee of the approximation algorithm. This suggests that taking into account the structure of the problem to design algorithms can lead to better results, possibly at the cost of a worse performance guarantee. An example for the vertex k-center problem can be seen in Garcia-Diaz et al. (2017), where a 3-approximation algorithm performs better than a 2-approximation algorithm despite having a worse performance guarantee. Landscapes over discrete configurations spaces are an important model in evolutionary and structural biology, as well as many other areas of science, from the physics of disordered systems to operations research. A landscape is a function defined on a very large discrete set V that carries an additional metric or at least topological structure into the real numbers R. We will consider landscapes defined on the vertex set of undirected graphs. Thus let G=G(V,E) be an undirected graph and f an arbitrary real-valued function taking values from V . We will refer to the triple (V,E,f) as a landscape over G. We say two configurations x,y in V are neutral if f(x)=f(y). We colloquially refer to a landscape as 'neutral'' if a substantial fraction of adjacent pairs of configurations are neutral. A flat landscape is one where f is constant. The opposite of flatness is ruggedness and it is defined as the number of local optima or by means of pair correlation functions. These two key features of a landscape, ruggedness and neutrality, appear to be two sides of the same coin. Ruggedness can be measured either by correlation properties, which are sensitive to monotonic transformation of the landscape, and by combinatorial properties such as the lengths of downhill paths and the number of local optima, which are invariant under monotonic transformations. The connection between the two views has remained largely unexplored and poorly understood. For this thesis, a survey on fitness landscapes is presented, together with the first steps in the direction to find this connection together with a relation between the covariance matrix of a random landscape model and its ruggedness.