The majority of car crash deaths occur in the front seats because the majority of occupants sit in the front seats. Traditionally, the rear seats were safer than the front seats because a front seated occupant would be closer to rigid structures such as the steering wheel, and they would be closer to the location of the impact. Therefore, government crash test regulations as well as academic and industry testing up to this point have principally focused on the front seats. Since the beginning of efforts to make cars safer, innovations were applied to the front seats first. Only some of these safety innovations have transitioned into the rear seats. Over the years, the front seats have gotten much safer due to advanced seatbelts with pretentioners and load limiters, airbags surrounding the driver, and structural changes to the vehicle frame to prevent intrusion into the occupant compartment. At the same time, occupant safety in the rear seats has also improved, however at only a fraction of the improvement of the front seats. With modern vehicles, the front seats have actually become safer than the rear seats for certain occupants and specific crash types (e.g., adult occupants in frontal crash). The lagging performance of the rear seats represents a problem because thousands of rear-seated occupants are injured or killed each year. With the rise in autonomous driving systems, the amount of occupants sitting in the rear seats, and therefore sustaining injury, could increase dramatically. In this dissertation, rear seats of a range of current vehicles were reconstructed to examine injury risk with the finite element models of two anthropomorphic test devices. These models showed a wide range of injury risks in the reconstructed seats. They were also able to show results similar to sled impact tests with the same vehicles. Knowledge gained from these reconstructions was then used to perform parametric studies on key variables that influence injury risk in the rear seats. From the parametric studies, it was found that the seat back angle, the width of the seatbelt anchors, and the presence of a seatbelt pretensioner had the largest influences on the injury risk. One of the injury mechanisms prevalent in the rear seats is submarining. Submarining likelihood and injury probability is difficult to predict with anthropomorphic test devices; however, human body models can help to improve injury prediction in these cases. To improve the injury prediction capability of human body models, several additions to the models are necessary. This dissertation outlines the investigation of spleen and kidney shapes through statistical shape analysis. This type of analysis allows more customizable human body models which could better capture the injury probability to these organs for a wider range of the population. Finally, subject-specific models of ribs were created to investigate factors affecting the predictive capability of finite element models. The findings and methodology from this body of work have the ability to add critical contributions to the understanding of injury risk and injury mechanisms in the rear seats. / Doctor of Philosophy / The majority of car crash deaths occur in the front seats because the majority of occupants sit in the front seats. Traditionally, the rear seats were safer than the front seats because a front seated occupant would be closer to hard objects such as the steering wheel, and they would be closer to the location of the impact. Therefore, government crash test regulations as well as academic and industry testing up to this point have principally focused on the front seats. Since the beginning of efforts to make cars safer, technology such as seatbelts and airbags were applied to the front seats first. Only some of this technology has been added into the rear seats. Over the years, the front seats have gotten much safer due to all the work focused on the front seats. At the same time, the rear seats have also improved, however at only a fraction of the improvement of the front seats. With modern vehicles, the front seats have actually become safer than the rear seats in some cases. The lagging performance of the rear seats represents a problem because thousands of rear-seated occupants are injured or killed each year. With the rise in self driving cars, the amount of occupants sitting in the rear seats, and therefore sustaining injury, could increase dramatically. In this dissertation, rear seats of a range of current vehicles were reconstructed to examine injury risk with the models of two crash test dummies. These models showed a wide range of injury risks in the reconstructed seats. They were also able to show results similar to physical tests with the same vehicles. Knowledge gained from this work was then used to help look at key variables that influence injury risk in the rear seats. It was found that the angle of the seat back, the width of the seatbelt anchors, and the presence of advanced seatbelts had the largest influences on the injury risk. One of the injury mechanisms prevalent in the rear seats is submarining, where the seatbelt slides up off the hips. Submarining likelihood and injury probability is difficult to predict with crash test dummies; however, human body models can help to improve injury prediction in these cases. To improve the injury prediction capability of human body models, several additions to the models are necessary. This dissertation outlines the investigation of spleen and kidney shapes to allow more customizable human body models which could better capture the injury probability to these organs for a wider range of the population. Finally, subject-specific models of ribs were created to investigate factors affecting the predictive capability of rib models. The findings and methodology from this body of work have the ability to add critical contributions to the understanding of injury risk and injury mechanisms in the rear seats.

Historically, rear seat occupants have been at a lower risk of serious injury and fatality in motor vehicle crashes than their front seat counterparts. However, many passive safety advancements that have occurred over the past few decades such as advanced airbag and seatbelt technology primarily benefit occupants of the front seat. Indeed, safety for front seat occupants has improved drastically in the 21st century, but has it improved so much that the front seat is now safer than the rear? Today, rear-seated occupants account for 10% of all passenger vehicle fatalities. In this era focused on achieving zero traffic deaths, the safety of rear-seated occupants must be further addressed. This dissertation analyzed U.S. national crash data to quantify the risk of injury and fatality to rear-seated passenger vehicle occupants while accounting for the influence of associated crash, vehicle, and occupant characteristics such as crash severity, vehicle model year, and occupant age/sex. In rear impacts, the risk of moderate-to-fatal injury was greater for rear-seated occupants than their front-seated counterparts. In high-severity rear impact crashes, catastrophic occupant compartment collapse can occur and carries with it a great fatality risk. In frontal impacts, there is evidence that the rear versus front seat relative risk of fatality has been increasing in vehicle model years 2007 and newer. Rear-seated occupants often sustained serious thoracic, abdomen, and/or head injuries that are generally related to seatbelt use. Seatbelt pretensioners and load limiters – commonplace technology in the front seating positions – aim to mitigate these types of injuries but are rarely provided as standard safety equipment in the rear seats of vehicles today. Finally, in side impacts, injury and fatality risks to rear- and front-seated occupants are more similar than in the other crash modes studied, though disparities in protection remain, especially in near-side vehicle-to-vehicle crashes. Finally, this work projects great injury reduction benefits if a rear seat belt reminder system were to be widely implemented in the U.S. vehicle fleet. This dissertation presents a comprehensive investigation of the factors that contribute to rear-seated occupant injury and/or fatality through retrospective studies on rear, front, and side impacts. The overall goal of this dissertation is to better quantify the current risk of injury to rear-seated occupants under a variety of crash conditions, compare this to the current risk to front-seated occupants, and, when possible, identify how exactly injuries are occurring and ways in which they may be prevented in the future. The findings can benefit automakers who seek to improve the effectiveness of rear seat safety systems as well as regulatory agencies seeking to improve was vehicle tests targeting rear seat passenger vehicle safety. / Doctor of Philosophy / Historically, if a passenger vehicle such as a sedan or SUV is in a crash, occupants who are rear-seated were less likely to be hurt than someone who was front-seated. In other words, rear-seated occupants have been at a lower risk of injury than front-seated occupants. Indeed, safety for front seat occupants has improved drastically in the 21st century due to advancements in airbag and seatbelt technologies, among others, but has it improved so much that the front seat is now safer than the rear? Today, of all vehicle occupants who are killed in crashes on U.S. roadways, 10% are rear-seated. During this time when conversations surrounding vehicle safety are focused on achieving zero traffic deaths, the safety of rear-seated occupants must be further studied. This dissertation looked at national databases of all police-reported crashes that occur each year in the United States. The risk of injury to rear-seated passenger vehicle occupants was quantified and compared to that of front-seated occupants. Factors that may increase or decrease this risk of injury and fatality such as crash type, vehicle type, and occupant demographics were further explored and reported. In vehicles that were rear-ended, the risk of injury was greater for rear-seated occupants than their front-seated counterparts. When a vehicle crashes into something front-first (the most common type of impact in a vehicle crash), evidence is presented that the risk of fatality is greater in the rear seats than the front seats in model year 2007 and newer vehicles which generally are equipped with the most recent airbag and seatbelt technology. When a vehicle is hit on either of its sides, the risk of injury is closer between rear- and front-seated occupants than it was in the rear-end or frontal crashes previously studied. That said, differences in occupant protection were still observed between the rear and front seats, especially when the occupants studied were seated on the closest side of impact, or the near-side, and the vehicle was struck by another vehicle rather than sliding into an object such as a pole. Finally, this work projects great injury reduction benefits if a rear seat belt reminder system were to be widely implemented in the U.S. vehicle fleet. This dissertation presents a comprehensive investigation of the factors that contribute to rear-seated occupant injury and/or fatality through retrospective studies on rear, front, and side impacts. The overall goal of this dissertation is to better quantify the current risk of injury to rear-seated occupants under a variety of crash conditions, compare this to the current risk to front-seated occupants, and, when possible, identify how exactly injuries are occurring and ways in which they may be prevented in the future. The findings can benefit automakers who seek to improve the effectiveness of rear seat safety systems as well as regulatory agencies seeking to improve was vehicle tests targeting rear seat passenger vehicle safety.