This dissertation examines four issues, including: (a) whether outdoor recreation experiences not included in the Recreation Experience Preference (REP) scales exist; (b) whether these experiences can be categorized using a framework called the Recreation Experience Matrix (REM); (c) how well the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) variables of activity, setting, and expertise explain the types of experiences outdoor recreationists receive; and (d) how well two new variables--primary mode and mode dependence--explain the types of experiences outdoor recreationists receive. In order to address these issues, an on-site questionnaire was distributed at Mount Rogers National Recreation Area in Virginia during October and November, 1995 A total of 410 people completed this questionnaire. Of these, 336 provided useable addresses for a follow-up mail-out questionnaire, with 169 (50.3%) actually returning it. After performing a variety of statistical analyses, it was found that: (a) some outdoor recreationists did report having non-REP experiences involving identity, cognition, absorption, and self-concept; (b) indirect support does exist for classifying outdoor recreation experiences using the REM framework; and (c) the ROS variables of activity, setting, and expertise, do explain some outdoor recreation experiences, as do the new variables of primary mode and mode dependence. / Ph. D.

¾Á¤B°ê®a¤½¶é¥­§¡¨C¤Ñ¦³¤W¸Uªº¹C«È¤H¦¸¡A¹C«È¦³·N¤ÎµL·Nªº¯}Ãa¦æ¬°µ¹¸Ó¦a¥ÍºAºc¦¨¬Û·íªºÀ£¤O¡CÓV´î³oÀ£¤Oªº¤èªk¤§¤@¡A¥i¯à¬Oµ¹¤©¹C«È¾A·íªº¸Ñ»¡¡CµM¦Ó¡AÁö¦³¾ÇªÌ±M®a»{¬°¸Ñ»¡¥i¥H´£¤É¹C«ÈªºÀô¹Òª¾ÃѤκA«×¡A´î¤Ö¥L­Ìªº¯}Ãa¦æ¬°¡A¦ý¤]¦³¾ÇªÌ±M®a½èºÃ¸Ñ»¡ªº®ÄªG¡C¥»¬ã¨sªº¥Øªº¬O¥HªÀ³»¦ÛµM¤½¶é¬°®×¨Ò¡A±´°Q¾Á¤B°ê®a¤½¶éªº¤á¥~¸Ñ»¡¯à§_§ïÅܹC«ÈªºÀô¹Ò»{ª¾¡]¥]¬AÀô¹Òª¾ÃÑ¡BÀô¹ÒÃö¤Á©MÀô¹ÒºA«×¡^¡B¹C¾ÍÅéÅç¤Î»PÀô«O¦³Ãöªº¦æ¬°·N¦V¡C¤èªk¬O¨Ì¾Ú¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡ªº¦³µL¤Î¹C¾Íªº«e«á¡A±NªÀ³»¦ÛµM¤½¶éªº¹C«È¤À¬°¡u¥¼¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡¡A¹C¾Í«e¡v¡B¡u¥¼¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡¡A¹C¾Í«á¡v¡B¡u¥¼¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡¡A¹C¾Í«e¡v¡B¡u¥¼¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡¡A¹C¾Í«á¡v¥|²Õ¡A³z¹L°Ý¨÷½Õ¬d¨ÓÀË´ú¸Ñ»¡©M¹C¾Í¸gÅç¹ï¹C«Èªº¼vÅT¡C®Ú¾Ú¦U²Õ62¤H¡A¦@248¤Hªº½Õ¬dµ²ªG¶i¦æ¦hÅܶqÅܲ§¼Æ¤ÀªR¡]MANOVA¡^µo²{¡AÅ¥¹L¸Ñ»¡ªº¹C«ÈªºÀô¹Òª¾ÃÑ°ª©ó¤w¹w¬ù¦ý©|¥¼Å¥¨ú¸Ñ»¡ªº¹C«È¡C¦ý¦bÀô¹ÒÃö¤Á¤Î¦æ¬°·N¦V¤W¡A³o¨â²Õ¤§¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡A¦Ó¥BÅ¥¹L¸Ñ»¡ªº¹C«Èªº¹C¾ÍÅéÅç§óÅãµÛ§C©ó©|¥¼Å¥¨ú¸Ñ»¡ªº¹C«È¡C¬ã¨sµ²ªG¤]Åã¥Ü¡A¹ï¨S¹w¬ù¸Ñ»¡¡]¦]¦¹¤]¨S¦³Å¥¸Ñ»¡¡^ªº¹C«È¦Ó¨¥¡A¦bªÀ³»¤½¶é¹C¾Íªº¸gÅç¨Ã¤£¼vÅT¥L­ÌªºÀô¹Ò»{ª¾¡B¹C¾ÍÅéÅç¤Î¦æ¬°·N¦V¡C

National parks have famously been called "America's best idea" and preserve the nation's natural and cultural resources for the enjoyment of all. One of the current working priorities of the National Park Service (NPS) is enhancing the relevancy and engagement of the national parks with diverse audiences, especially for underserved groups. To address this priority, transportation is needed to provide access to national parks, but transportation may not be equally accessible to all groups in society. Understanding the effects of transportation on visitation to the national parks by racial/ethnic groups is essential for the NPS to improve the accessibility of transportation systems and encourage greater visitation by racial/ethnic minority groups. Moreover, transportation can be more than a means of access, it can also be a form of recreation itself, providing opportunities for visitors to experience and appreciate parks and related areas. But, differences in desirability of transportation recreation opportunities across recreation settings and among racial/ethnic groups are rarely addressed. The intent of this dissertation is three-fold: 1) identify transportation related barriers impacting visitation to national parks by racial/ethnic groups, and the effects of transportation on the visiting national parks, 2) identify the differences in indicators of the transportation recreation opportunity spectrum among racial/ethnic visitors and across recreation settings, 3) measure spatial accessibility of national parks and the effects of spatial accessibility and other factors on visitation to national parks among racial/ethnic groups. The first phase of research is designed to identify barriers to visiting national parks that are related to marginality, subculture, and discrimination hypotheses, and examine the effects of transportation incentives on visitation among racial/ethnic groups. Study results found that racial/ethnic minority groups visited national parks less frequently than Whites. Hispanics were more likely to perceive transportation-related barriers to visiting national parks than Whites. Moreover, providing transportation incentives can increase visitation by Hispanics significantly. The second phase of research developed indicators for a transportation recreation opportunity spectrum (T-ROS), and examined the differences in desirability for T-ROS indicators among alternative transportation modes, different types of recreation settings, and different racial/ethnic groups. Study results identified the important indicators for transportation service in different types of recreation areas, which can help inform transportation planning and management for the NPS. The final phase of research examined the spatial accessibility of national parks from different geographic locations by incorporating geospatial analytics, assessed the spatial accessibility of different types of national parks among racial/ethnic groups, and estimated the effects of spatial accessibility on visitation to national parks. Results showed that Hispanics and Blacks had higher accessibility to national parks than Whites within short distance radii, however, Blacks and Hispanics were more likely to perceive distance as a barrier to visiting national parks than Whites. Study results can help the NPS understand the spatial structure of national parks, provide visual information for visitors about proximate national parks and recreation opportunities, and identified effective management strategies for enhancing visitation of racial/ethnic minority groups from different geographic areas.

This study investigates issues of changing recreation use and management in the Greenstone and Caples Valleys. Its underlying research themes are the differing characteristics and activities of four distinct user-groups, how such differences could contribute to conflict in recreation use and management, and the implications of such for management. The conceptual framework used to deal with these issues is the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS), which is based upon the assumption that quality in recreation experiences and management is best achieved through provision of a range of recreation opportunities. This recognises that objective research input into recreation management cannot substitute for the ultimate subjectivity required in decision-making. Management has two roles here. First, to maintain and/or enhance the range of recreation opportunities availible. Second, to provide users with appropriate signals regarding the availibility of opportunities, and the acceptable norms of use and behaviour. Thus user choice of area and activities undertaken within becomes more a consequence of management action. This differs from most recreation management to date, which has tended to be in response to changing conditions (eg'demand-driven'). The absence of an equitable management approach results in selective reduction of opportunities for certain experiences, as evident from research into effects of conflict/crowding perceptions. In contrast, approaches such as the ROS emphasise management for such opportunities. On this basis and from research results, this study found that maintenance of experiences associated with angling and hunting opportunities in the study area, should be the basis for its management. These opportunities were exploited by relatively more experienced participants. For anglers in particular this was reflected by their characteristics of high activity specialisation. Greater experience and specialisation involved more specific resource requirements and norms of appropriate behaviour. Thus opportunities for hunting and angling in the study area were more susceptible to negative impacts from other uses and users. These impacts would be greatest for angling experiences. This would be more a consequence of perceived inappropriate behaviour by less specialised anglers than a consequence of physical crowding. For hunters these impacts would be primarily a result of concern about the increased presence of others on hunting management, rather than their actual presence. Experiences from the tramping and commercial guided walking opportunities availible are also important, but their participants were relatively less experienced and their recreation opportunities less unique in the region. In the context of an equitable regional ROS approach, there is greater flexibility for their provision elsewhere than there is for experiences from hunting and fishing opportunities. For maintenance of a spectrum of opportunities in the regional ROS, these hunting and angling opportunities should be emphasised in management decision-making. Within the study area itself, management for a regional ROS requires that the Greenstone and Caples Valleys be managed differently. It was clear that the Caples was perceived as providing more 'back-country'-type experience opportunities. In the regional ROS context, management should emphasise maintenance of such opportunities there. Along with this should be noted the greater preference for the CapIes by hunters, and for the Greenstone by anglers.