91 |
Electrical self stimulation, a conventional reinforcerBeninger, Richard J. January 1974 (has links)
No description available.
|
92 |
The effects of within-session manipulation of reinforcer magnitude on schedule-induced polydipsia /Pasquali, Paula E. January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
|
93 |
Gustatory and post-ingestional aspects of reinforcementMessier, Claude. January 1982 (has links)
No description available.
|
94 |
A test of the mechanism of reinforcement: the role of decreased and increased intensities of lightGreenfeld, Norman 01 January 1954 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
95 |
The effects of instructions for performance and consequence imagery in covert reinforcement.Peters, John Thomas 01 January 1977 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
96 |
The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.Wessells, Michael G. 01 January 1974 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
97 |
Vicarious verbal conditioning as a function of an observer's expectancy regarding the friendliness of the reinforcing agent.Jorgensen, Bruce W. 01 January 1971 (has links) (PDF)
The fact" that behavior can be conditioned through the use of verbal reinforcement is well documented (c.f. Kanf er, 1968 ; Flanders , 1968 ) • Specific critical responses of a subject, reinforced by praise or utterance of the word "good, " tend to increase in frequency, in this type of conditioning.
|
98 |
The effects of reinforcement of the development of inhibitory stimulus control.Collins, Jeremiah P. 01 January 1971 (has links) (PDF)
The pecking response of pigeons was reinforced when directed at a key transilluminated by chromatic light. Subjects were assigned to one of three sequences of S+ and S- stimuli and to one of two multiple schedules of reinforcement. The AE Group (acquisition - extinction) received daily a block of nine S+ periods followed immediately by a block of nine S- periods. The EA Group received the reverse order of stimuli while a control group (R Group) received a random sequence of stimuli. Each of the ' above sequences of stimulus presentation was in effect in conjunction with either a Mult VI-1 min - Ext schedule or a Mult VI-1 min - VI-4 min schedule of reinforcement. A total of six groups were thus obtained
|
99 |
Response-enforcer manipulations in the analysis of blocking/Stickney, Kenneth John 01 January 1980 (has links) (PDF)
The effect of prior experience on a current learning task is of the utmost relevance to theories of learning. In special cases, prior experience may even prevent subsequent learning. These cases can generally be thought of as instances of the blocking phenomenon (e.g., Kamin, 1969; Wagner, Logan, Haberlandt, and Price, 1968). Specifically, if a stimulus A is paired with a reinforcer so that a response comes under the control of that stimulus, then when a novel stimulus B is simultaneously compounded with A and also paired with the reinforcer, stimulus B does not acquire control over the response, as measured by presentation of B alone in extinction. Stimulus A is said to "block" the establishment of stimulus control by B.
|
100 |
The role of generalization decrement in failures to demonstrate conditioned reinforcement: temporal factorsAstley, Suzette Lynn. January 1978 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1978 A84 / Master of Science
|
Page generated in 0.071 seconds