Background: The direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban is approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), based on the results of large phase III trials. Objectives: To confirm rivaroxaban's effectiveness and safety in routine clinical care of patients with VTE. Methods: Data were obtained from prospective, noninterventional registries: the FIRST registry (United Kingdom), DRESDEN NOAC registry (Germany), and SWIVTER (Switzerland). Baseline characteristics of these registries and effectiveness and safety outcome rates for the FIRST and DRESDEN NOAC registries were compared. Results: A total of 1841 rivaroxaban-treated patients with acute VTE (57.9% male, 76.6% deep vein thrombosis [DVT]; 23.4% pulmonary embolism ± DVT; median age, 61 years) were included: 1217 from the FIRST registry, 418 from the DRESDEN NOAC registry, and 206 from SWIVTER. Median time between VTE diagnosis and initiation of rivaroxaban was 1.4 ± 1.81 days (25th–75th percentile 1–1; range, 0–15 days). On-treatment outcome rates for the FIRST and DRESDEN NOAC registries were 0.74 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–1.54) versus 0.96 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.46–2.01) for VTE recurrence; 1.16 per 100 patient years (95% CI, 0.64–2.09) versus 2.51 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 1.58–3.98) for ISTH major bleeding and 1.69 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 1.21–2.35) versus 1.73 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 1.27–2.36) for all-cause mortality (intention-to-treat analysis), respectively. Conclusion: Overall treatment outcomes were consistent with the results of the phase III rivaroxaban trials in VTE treatment, indicating that the use of rivaroxaban offers acceptable treatment results also in routine care. However, we observed significant differences in patient characteristics and management patterns across Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Germany, limiting direct comparisons of unadjusted outcome event rates between registries.

Objectives: The management of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) under everyday clinical conditions has been insufficiently studied. We therefore collected comprehensive observational data on patients with MMN who received intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulins (IGs) as maintenance therapy. Methods: This was a prospective, noninterventional study (registry) in neurological centres (hospitals and offices) throughout Germany. Results: As of 1 December 2015, 80 patients with MMN were included (mean age 55.4 ± 9.8 years, 67% males, mean disease duration 10.7 ± 10.2 years). The affected limb regions were predominantly distal muscle groups of the upper extremities. On the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) scale, 94% of the patients had some disability in the arms and 61% in the legs. At inclusion, 98.8% received IVIG and 1.3% SCIG. Substantial variation was observed between IVIG treatment intervals (every 0.7 to 17.3 weeks) and dosage (0.2–2.1 g/kg body weight received during a single administration; mean monthly dosage, 0.9 g/kg body weight). However, the mean monthly dosage was steady over time. At 1-year follow up, improvement was seen in muscle strength, INCAT and quality of life (QoL) scores (SF-36 questionnaire). Conclusions: The management of patients with MMN in everyday clinical practice demonstrates a wide range of absolute dosages and treatment intervals of IG, supporting the recommended practice of determining treatment dose on an individual patient basis. The improvements in muscle strength and reduction in disability, accompanied by increased QoL, strengthen the case for use of IG as a maintenance treatment for MMN.