Additional cognitive deficits, including impairments in spatial working memory and/or saccadic remapping processes, have recently been implicated in unilateral neglect – a neurological condition classically characterized as a disorder of attention. The interactions between saccadic remapping and three memory processes (position memory, object memory and object-location binding) were investigated in healthy young (n=27) and elderly (n=20) participants to establish a baseline of comparison for future use with neglect patients and to study the effects of aging on these processes. In a computerized task, participants were instructed to first detect a target, and then hold in memory either its position, identity or both over a delay period. Subsequently, participants were tested on their memory for that particular task. The saccadic remapping component was introduced at the onset of the delay period with the fixation cross shifting either to the left, or right, requiring participants to remap the visual array into either right or left space, or remaining in the centre of the screen (i.e., no remapping condition). In the position memory and object-location binding task, a consistent cost to memory performance was found when remapping right only for the young participants. Overall the elderly did not perform any of the tasks involving a position memory component as well as the young participants and showed spatial asymmetries in the target detection task. The lack of an effect of remapping in the elderly group may be due to a general decrement in performance. These results are discussed in terms of hemispheric asymmetries and cognitive theories of aging.

Additional cognitive deficits, including impairments in spatial working memory and/or saccadic remapping processes, have recently been implicated in unilateral neglect – a neurological condition classically characterized as a disorder of attention. The interactions between saccadic remapping and three memory processes (position memory, object memory and object-location binding) were investigated in healthy young (n=27) and elderly (n=20) participants to establish a baseline of comparison for future use with neglect patients and to study the effects of aging on these processes. In a computerized task, participants were instructed to first detect a target, and then hold in memory either its position, identity or both over a delay period. Subsequently, participants were tested on their memory for that particular task. The saccadic remapping component was introduced at the onset of the delay period with the fixation cross shifting either to the left, or right, requiring participants to remap the visual array into either right or left space, or remaining in the centre of the screen (i.e., no remapping condition). In the position memory and object-location binding task, a consistent cost to memory performance was found when remapping right only for the young participants. Overall the elderly did not perform any of the tasks involving a position memory component as well as the young participants and showed spatial asymmetries in the target detection task. The lack of an effect of remapping in the elderly group may be due to a general decrement in performance. These results are discussed in terms of hemispheric asymmetries and cognitive theories of aging.

Right parietal lesions often lead to neglect, in which patients fail to attend to leftward stimuli. Recent models of neglect suggest that, in addition to attentional impairments, patients demonstrate impairments of spatial remapping and/or spatial working memory (SWM). Although spatial remapping could be considered a kind of spatial memory process itself (i.e., updating remembered locations based on anticipated saccade outcomes), the two processes operate on very different time scales (milliseconds versus seconds). In the present study, the influence of saccadic and spatial remapping on SWM was examined in healthy individuals. An initial control condition, in which participants had to respond to a probe stimulus (i.e., “is the probe in the location previously occupied by the target?”) following a 1500 ms delay, was contrasted with conditions in which the fixation point moved (left, right, up, or down) at the onset of the delay. In a second version of the task, participants made covert shifts of attention at delay onset requiring covert spatial, rather than saccadic, remapping. In both tasks SWM performance was best when no remapping was required. Decrements in SWM were largest overall in the spatial remapping task, whereas for both saccadic and spatial remapping, a consistent cost was observed for remapping the target array into right visual space. Results are discussed in terms of hemispheric biases in attention and differences in performance for peripersonal versus extrapersonal space.

Right parietal lesions often lead to neglect, in which patients fail to attend to leftward stimuli. Recent models of neglect suggest that, in addition to attentional impairments, patients demonstrate impairments of spatial remapping and/or spatial working memory (SWM). Although spatial remapping could be considered a kind of spatial memory process itself (i.e., updating remembered locations based on anticipated saccade outcomes), the two processes operate on very different time scales (milliseconds versus seconds). In the present study, the influence of saccadic and spatial remapping on SWM was examined in healthy individuals. An initial control condition, in which participants had to respond to a probe stimulus (i.e., “is the probe in the location previously occupied by the target?”) following a 1500 ms delay, was contrasted with conditions in which the fixation point moved (left, right, up, or down) at the onset of the delay. In a second version of the task, participants made covert shifts of attention at delay onset requiring covert spatial, rather than saccadic, remapping. In both tasks SWM performance was best when no remapping was required. Decrements in SWM were largest overall in the spatial remapping task, whereas for both saccadic and spatial remapping, a consistent cost was observed for remapping the target array into right visual space. Results are discussed in terms of hemispheric biases in attention and differences in performance for peripersonal versus extrapersonal space.