本研究旨在建構國內適用之幼兒就學準備度評量「五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）」，供幼兒園確保教育品質之用。研究者首先廣泛蒐集幼兒就學準備度相關文獻，包含：幼兒就學準備度內涵、幼兒學習標準與表現指標、幼兒就學準備度評量等部分，接著選取具有代表性、符合我國文化特性，以及出版日期較新之六篇重點文獻進行統整與比較，藉由文獻分析後所建立的國內外幼兒就學準備度內涵對照表，與了解幼兒學習標準與表現指標、幼兒就學準備度評量現況後的啟示，作為建構五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）之參考。六篇重要文獻包含美國Head Start辦公室所發展的「幼兒學習成果架構」（Child Outcomes Framework）、High Scope基金會所發展的兒童行為觀察記錄表Child Observation Record (COR)、盧美貴（2003)「我國五歲幼兒基本能力與學力指標建構研究」、林秀錦與王天苗(2004)「幼兒入學準備能力之研究」、香港教育局（2003）的「兒童發展表現指標」、香港教育學院的「兒童發展評量表」（2007）。研究者以盧美貴（2003）「我國五歲幼兒基本能力與學力指標」與香港教育學院「兒童發展評量表」為藍本建構出評量表（長題本）之雛形，並透過問卷調查法與訪談調查法，進行五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）的適用性檢視與修訂，最後完成我國適用之五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）之建構。在調查研究的部分，為確立「長題本」的適用性，研究者以立意取樣，選取公私立幼兒園各2所，各1班，共計4班，每班2位教師，共8位老師，請教師評量班上的大班幼兒，求兩位教師評分結果的相關，建立評量表之信度，並根據訪談的意見與回饋進行評量表內容之修正。 我國適用之五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）不僅可以在教學上使用亦可作為研究用。為進一步了解評量表（長題本）在相關研究之應用性，研究者透過預試及專家小組的討論篩選題目，建構五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（短題本），探討教師與家長對幼兒就學準備度期望與現況之情形。研究者以便利取樣，抽取台北市公私立幼兒園的教師與家長，實施調查研究，共寄出525份問卷，回收425份，有效份數為400份，有效回收比例為76％，有效回收份數中，家長有178份，教師有222份。研究者將問卷所得之量化資料以SPSS 12.0中文版統計套裝軟體進行分析；綜合文獻分析、問卷調查與訪談調查，本研究之結論如下： 一、我國適用之五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）具有良好的適用性。 二、我國適用之五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表（長題本）建構結果：包含「領域」、「重點」、「項目」與「行為指標」四個層次，分為健康與身體、情緒與社會、語言與溝通、認知及學習取向五個領域，共有24個重點、62個項目、177個行為指標。每個行為指標又分為三個水平，代表該能力發展的程度，由不熟悉至精熟。評量表以檢核表形式呈現，由熟悉幼兒的教師勾選，備註欄提供教師紀錄與該行為指標相關的軼事記錄、例證、評語、作品等，做為評量的依據與輔助說明。 三、家長與教師對幼兒就學準備度的期望有顯著差異，家長的期望高於教師的期望。 四、公私立幼兒園的家長背景變項在教育程度、職業類別、家庭每月總收入、與幼兒就讀幼兒園年數有顯著差異；公私立教師的背景變項在教師年齡、教學年資、大班教學年資、最高學歷、任教年級有顯著差異。五、公私立幼兒園家長背景變項、教師背景變項與幼兒就學準備度期望間部分有差異。 六、教師背景的最高學歷與語言與溝通領域的期望達顯著差異，教師年齡與情緒與社會領域、學習取向領域的期望達到顯著差異；家長背景的家長教育程度與健康與身體領域、情緒與社會領域、認知領域、學習取向領域、認知數理邏輯領域的期望達顯著差異，且事後比較發現學歷為研究所以上的家長期望較低。 七、家長對幼兒就學準備度期望與幼兒就學準備度表現現況有顯著差異，家長對幼兒就學準備度的期望顯著高於幼兒就學準備度表現的現況。 最後，研究者根據文獻分析、問卷調查及訪談調查的結果提出建議，期許對未來幼教的發展有所裨益。 / The main purpose of this study is to construct a reliable and valid five-year-old children school readiness assessment (long version) in order to ensure the quality of education in kindergartens. Through extensively collecting several relevant literatures as to Child Outcomes Framework (Head Start), Child Observation Record (COR), Readiness Skills Preparing for Better Earning and Adjustment in Elementary school (Shiu-Chin Lin & Tien-Miau Wang, 2004), Key Competency and Performance Indicators in Early Childhood Education (Mei-kuei Lu, 2003), Hong Kong Children's Development Performance Indicators (Hong Kong Government's Bureau, 2003), Hong Kong Child Development Scale (2007), the five-year-old children school readiness assessment (long version) is formed and revised after literature analysis, questionnaire survey and personal interview. This can not only be used for teaching but also for researching. The five-year-old children school readiness assessment (short version) is for understanding the expectation of kindergarten teachers and parents of school readiness. The results are analyzed by means, standard deviations, t-test and one-way ANOVA. Here are the results of this study: A. The five-year-old children school readiness assessment (long version) has good reliability and validity. B. The five-year-old children school readiness assessment (long version) is related to five domains (physical health and development domain, social and emotional domain, language and communicate domain, cognitive domain and approaches to learning domain), 24 points, 62 items and 177 indicators. Every indicator has three performance levels and a remarks column that can offer teachers to record related observations, reviews, children’s performances etc. C. The expectation of school readiness between kindergarten teachers’ and parents’ is significantly different. Parents’ expectation is higher than kindergarten teachers’ expectation. D. There are significantly different characters between public and private kindergartens. E. There are significantly different expectations of school readiness among the different background of families and kindergarten teachers. F. The parents’ expectation of school readiness and their children’s performance of school readiness is significant different. Parents’ expectation is higher than their children’s school readiness performance.

本研究以「幼兒就學準備度」的觀點，瞭解英國幼兒教育的學習與發展研究，包括幼兒基礎階段之背景（幼教政策與研究計畫）、幼兒基礎階段實施綱要、相關應用等。進而比較英國幼兒學習與發展評量表與我國五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表之內涵，同時採訪談法的方式，便利取樣選取公私立園所4所，共11位教師，使用「英國幼兒學習與發展評量表」及我國「五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表」評量班上1位幼兒，以瞭解現場教師對於兩評量表在使用上的差異，同時給予相關的回饋與建議。 研究結果如下： 壹、英國重要幼教政策及法案內容特色有三： 一、重視各項幼教政策間的連續性與穩定性。 二、政策制訂具有前瞻性。 三、明確規範各相關部門職責，保障並促進跨部門的協調合作。 貳、英國「幼兒基礎階段實施綱要」內容特色有四： 一、整合三份重要幼兒照顧方案。 二、具體明確的學習與發展架構。 三、配合「幼兒基礎階段教師實務指引」、「幼兒基礎階段評量表手冊」及「幼兒基礎階段之改變計畫」。 四、「英國幼兒學習與發展評量表」呼應幼兒就學準備度的觀點。 參、我國「五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表」與英國「幼兒學習與發展評量表」之行為指標比較。 一、 學習途徑：（一）英國評量表鼓勵幼兒運用各種表達方式與感官學習。（二）我國評量表鼓勵幼兒「說出」、「辨別」；英國評量表鼓勵「操作」。（三）我國評量表強調幼兒「嘗試」、「複述」；英國透過「閱讀故事」方式學習。 二、 行為指標敘述特色：（一）評量格式不同，英國評量表之幼兒發展層次 性較為明顯。（二）涵蓋廣度不同，英國評量表的涵蓋範圍較廣。（三）認知概念之應用性不同。 肆、現場教師對我國「五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表」與英國「幼兒學習與發展評量表」之評價。 一、「五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表」較有助於教師課程規劃。 二、「英國幼兒學習與發展評量表」較有利於親師溝通。 本研究並根據研究結果提出建議，以「他山之石，可以攻錯」的借鏡觀點，提供對未來台灣幼兒教育發展之建議及後續研究之參考。 / The main purpose of this study is to understand the concept of children’s school readiness, and the Learning and Development Requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage in the UK. Include early childhood education and care policy, the effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project, statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, and achievement of children in the early years foundation stage profile. This study received to 11 teacher’s interview to understand the difference between the five-year-old children school readiness assessment and the EYFS profile assessment scales. And share any observations on children. Here are the results of this study: A. Early childhood education and care policy characteristics: 1. Continuous and stable. 2. Proactive. 3. Accountability and integration- locally, regionally and nationally. B. “Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage”characteristics: 1. The EYFS is founded on existing standards already used in all types of childcare. 2. The Learning and Development Requirements are specific. 3. Use “Practice Guidance for the Early Years Foundation Stage”, “Early Year Foundation Stage Profile Handbook”, “Making A Big Difference in the Early Years Foundation Stage”. 4. The EYFS profile assessment scales is related to the children’s school readiness. C. The learning way and characteristics are differences between the five-year-old children school readiness assessment and the EYFS profile assessment scales. D. There are differences meaning to teachers when they use the five-year-old children school readiness assessment and he EYFS profile assessment scales. 1. The five-year-old children school readiness assessment is good for teachers to plan an effective and appropriate curriculum that will meet all children’s needs. 2. The EYFS profile assessment scales can help teachers to communicate with parents.