Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1972. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

No description available.

No description available.

Memory CD8 T cells offer increased protection to immune hosts by rapidly eliminating pathogen-infected cells during re-infection. Generating and sustaining a protective memory CD8 T cell response is considered a hallmark of adaptive immunity. Extensive research has been devoted to understanding the parameters affecting memory CD8 T cell generation after infection or immunization in order to design the most effective vaccines. An accepted notion in the field is that increased protection from re-infection is afforded by the generation of a large number of memory CD8 T cells. Consecutive prime-boost immunization strategies that elicit secondary responses are often used to increase the absolute numbers of memory CD8 T cells. While parameters affecting the generation of primary memory CD8 T cells are well known, the factors influencing the development of re-stimulated secondary CD8 T cell responses remain understudied. Here, I addressed the mechanisms involved in the generation and development of secondary memory CD8 T cells. I found that the time at which primary memory CD8 T cells enter into an immune response during re-infection impacts their fate and differentiation into secondary memory CD8 T cells. Late-entry of primary memory CD8 T cells into an immune response (relative to the initiation of infection) not only facilitates expression of transcription factors associated with memory formation in secondary effector CD8 T cells, but also influences the ability of secondary memory CD8 T cells to localize within the lymph nodes, produce interleukin-2 cytokine (IL-2), and undergo robust antigen-driven proliferation. The timing of stimulation of primary memory CD8 T cells also impacts the duration of expression of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (CD25) on secondary effector CD8 T cells and their sensitivity to IL-2 signaling. Importantly, by blocking or enhancing IL-2 signaling in developing secondary CD8 T cells, I verify the role of IL-2 in controlling the differentiation of secondary CD8 T cell responses. The data I present herein suggest that the process of primary memory-to-secondary memory CD8 T cell differentiation is not fixed and can be manipulated, a notion with implications in the design of future prime-boost vaccination approaches. Although vaccines are designed and intended to benefit a range of individuals, at times the efficacy of a vaccination regime depends on the overall health status of a host. Thus, in another portion of my thesis work I explored the extent to which obesity compromises the differentiation and maintenance of protective memory CD8 T cell responses. I found that diet-induced obesity did not impact the maintenance of pre-existing memory CD8 T cells, including their acquisition of a long-term memory phenotype (i.e., CD27hi, CD62Lhi, KLRG1low) and function (i.e., cytokine production, antigen-driven secondary expansion, and memory CD8 T cell-mediated protection). Additionally, diet-induced obesity did not influence the differentiation and maintenance of newly evoked memory CD8 T cell responses, in inbred and outbred hosts, that were generated in response to different types of systemic (LCMV, L. monocytogenes) and/or localized (influenza virus) infections. Interestingly, I found that the rate of naïve-to-memory CD8 T cell differentiation after a peptide-coated dendritic cell immunization was similar in lean and obese hosts. This suggests that obesity-associated inflammation is unlike pathogen- or adjuvant-induced inflammation, and does not influence the development of an endogenous memory CD8 T cell response. My studies reveal that the obese environment does not influence the development or maintenance of memory CD8 T cell responses that are either primed before or after obesity is established. This is a surprising notion with implications for future studies aiming to elucidate the role of obesity in susceptibility to infection and vaccine efficacy. Collectively, the data presented here further the understanding of memory CD8 T cell responses in contexts of health and disease.

The desire to enhance and make ourselves better is not a new one and it has continued to intrigue throughout the ages. Individuals have continued to seek ways to improve and enhance their well-being for example through nutrition, physical exercise, education and so on. Crucial to this improvement of their well-being is improving their ability to remember. Hence, people interested in improving their well-being, are often interested in memory as well. The rationale being that memory is crucial to our well-being. The desire to improve one’s memory then is almost certainly as old as the desire to improve one’s well-being. Traditionally, people have used different means in an attempt to enhance their memories: for example in learning through storytelling, studying, and apprenticeship. In remembering through practices like mnemonics, repetition, singing, and drumming. In retaining, storing and consolidating memories through nutrition and stimulants like coffee to help keep awake; and by external aids like notepads and computers. In forgetting through rituals and rites. Recent scientific advances in biotechnology, nanotechnology, molecular biology, neuroscience, and information technologies, present a wide variety of technologies to enhance many different aspects of human functioning. Thus, some commentators have identified human enhancement as central and one of the most fascinating subject in bioethics in the last two decades. Within, this period, most of the commentators have addressed the Ethical, Social, Legal and Policy (ESLP) issues in human enhancements as a whole as opposed to specific enhancements. However, this is problematic and recently various commentators have found this to be deficient and called for a contextualized case-by-case analysis to human enhancements for example genetic enhancement, moral enhancement, and in my case memory enhancement (ME). The rationale being that the reasons for accepting/rejecting a particular enhancement vary depending on the enhancement itself. Given this enormous variation, moral and legal generalizations about all enhancement processes and technologies are unwise and they should instead be evaluated individually. Taking this as a point of departure, this research will focus specifically on making a case for ME and in doing so assessing the ESLP implications arising from ME. My analysis will draw on the already existing literature for and against enhancement, especially in part two of this thesis; but it will be novel in providing a much more in-depth analysis of ME. From this perspective, I will contribute to the ME debate through two reviews that address the question how we enhance the memory, and through four original papers discussed in part three of this thesis, where I examine and evaluate critically specific ESLP issues that arise with the use of ME. In the conclusion, I will amalgamate all my contribution to the ME debate and suggest the future direction for the ME debate.