Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:28:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Caroline Angelo da Cruz.pdf: 533959 bytes, checksum: 5b7556b335bb0291d8c0611f6c181886 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-26 / Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Campinas / This research broaches the question about adolescent s evasion in situations of shelter house, supported by the Winnicott s comprehension about the affective development process. The adolescents who are conduct for the shelter houses are subject to various type of vulnerability, such as poverty, family disorder (many times with psychiatric problems and parents addition in drugs), the exploration and sexual abuse, physics and moral violence, in sum up conjunctures what can describe a lack of support of familiar and social care. The shelter house s situations provide objectives environmental situation better than theirs original environments, however, it s common the evasion and the voluntary return of the adolescents to more precarious environmental situations. The question which we approached was: What are the psycho-affectives dynamics which can clarify the causes of that choice. The evasion situation these shelter houses, is deeply concerned with the completion of antisocial attitudes which leads us to look for in Winnicott also an explanation of this phenomenon. For him (1946b), antisocial attitude derives fundamentally from environmental failures which deprive the individual, in other words remove abruptly something he has (in terms of environmental support), considering the antisocial attitude as a help to led to the environment. In the case of evasions, we consider that Winnicot can explaining the role of environmental support in its early stages of emotional development, to show that situations of deprivation performed by the environment, could become the basis of the attitude of evasion, in other words the evasion occurs because of the need for a very specific holding refers to the tendency antisocial, which is the need to survive the environment to attack made against it. / Esta pesquisa aborda a quest?o da evas?o de adolescentes nas situa??es de abrigo, apoiando-se na compreens?o de Winnicott sobre o processo de desenvolvimento afetivo. Os adolescentes que s?o encaminhados para os abrigos estiveram sujeitos a diversos tipos de vulnerabilidade, tais como a pobreza, a desorganiza??o familiar (por vezes com a presen?a de problemas psiqui?tricos e de drogradi??o nos pais), a explora??o e o abuso sexual, a viol?ncia tanto f?sica como moral, enfim, conjunturas que caracterizam uma falta de sustenta??o e acolhimento familiar e social. As situa??es de abrigo fornecem condi??es ambientais objetivas melhores que as de seus ambientes de origem, no entanto, ? comum a evas?o e o retorno volunt?rio do adolescente a situa??es ambientais mais prec?rias. O questionamento abordado foi o de saber quais s?o as din?micas psicoafetivas que poderiam esclarecer os motivos dessa escolha. A situa??o de evas?o, nesses abrigos, est? profundamente relacionada com a realiza??o de atitudes antissociais, o que nos leva tamb?m a procurar em Winnicott uma explica??o sobre esse fen?meno. Para ele (1946b), a atitude antissocial deriva, fundamentalmente, das falhas ambientais que deprivam o indiv?duo, ou seja, retiram abruptamente algo que ele tem (em termos de suporte ambiental), considerando a atitude antissocial como um SOS dirigido ao ambiente. No caso das evas?es, consideramos que Winnicot pode, explicitando a fun??o da sustenta??o ambiental nas suas fases iniciais do processo de desenvolvimento afetivo mostrar que as situa??es de depriva??o realizadas pelo ambiente, poderiam estar na base da atitude de evas?o; ou seja, a evas?o ocorre devido ? necessidade de um holding referente ? tend?ncia antissocial, que ? da necessidade que o ambiente sobreviva aos ataques efetuados contra ele.