The work has been focused on the preconcentration techniques for determination of 9Be, 51V, 59Co, 60Ni, 89Y, 111Cd, 208Pb, 232Th and 238U on the modified sorbents, all measurements were performed on ICP-MS. The instrument setup was optimized. The solution of internal standard (200 µg•l-1) was used during all measurements. The internal standard were chosen as follows: 6Li for 9Be, 45Sc (51V), 72Ge (59Co, 60Ni, 89Y), 103Rh (111Cd), 209Bi (206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th and 238U). Another parameters such as influence of mineral acids (HCl, HNO3), surfactant (Septonex®, Zephyramin, Ajatin, Brij 35 and Sodium dodecyl sulphate) and organic reagents (Ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate, 8-Hydroxyquinoline-5-sulphonic acid, 1,2-Dihydroxyanthraquinone-3-sulphonic acid and 4-(2-Pyridylazo)resorcinol) and the effect of some matrix components on intensity of instrument signal determination was investigated. For preconcentration polar Silicagel and modified nonpolar Silicagels (Silicagel-C18, C8 nad Phenyl) were used. Another experimantal part was dedicated to preconcentration on nonpolar Amberlite XAD-16 and Strata SDB-L and intermediately polar sorbent Amberlite XAD-7. Recoveries of sorption process were observed in the presence of all testing types of surfactants in certified concentration 5•10-4 mol•l-1. Surfactants were always applied in the conditioning step. The suitable combinations of surfactant and organic reagent were tested for increasing of recoveries of analytes. Testing organic reagents were added in five times mass excess againts concentration of analytes, the concentration of the organic reagents was 900 µg•l-1. The organic reagent was always added to the solution for preconcentration before this solution was led on the sorbent. The composition and a necessary volume of elution mixture for quantitative elution were tested, too. Only one sorbent was chosen from each group of sorbents with similar properties. The chosen sorbent showed the best recoveries in majority of target analytes. The highest recoveries from silica-group was reached for Silicagel-C18, from nonpolar Amberlite was chosen Strata SDB-L and intermediately polar Amberlite XAD-7. The influence of some matrix components (anionts and cations) on recoveries of analytes was investigated for chosen sorbent. The optimized process was applied on real samples of nature water and industry water. In experimental part all analytes are marked as specific izotopes, which were measured by ICP-MS. Of course, all izotopes of analytes undergo preconcentration techniques.

The determination of inorganic speciations of arsenic, antimony, selenium and tellurium in natural waters demands often separation and preconcentration. Solid phase extraction is a very effective method for these purposes. In this paper the separation and preconcentration of these microelements is realised on the basis of modified silica Separon SGX C18, SGX C8, SGX CN, SGX NH2, SGX Phenyl and strongly basic anion Exchanger SGX AX. The sorption was provided in the presence of cationic surfactants such as benzyldimethyl dodecylammonium bromide (Ajatin), benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium chloride (Zephyramine), 1-ethoxycarbonylpentadecyltrimetrhylammonium bromide (Septonex) and selected complexing agents 4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol (PAR), 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulphonic acide (8-HQS), 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (PYR), amonium 1-pyrrolidinecarbodithioate (APDC), sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DTC) or thiourea(Thur). The interactions of the formed ion associate with the sorbent shows a complicated character which has not been cleared as yet. The previous conditioning of the sorbent plays an outstanding role. Thus, the sorption efficiency was studied in the presence and absence of surfactant and of selected organic complexing agents. Moreover, the influence of pH of the sorbed solution as well as the speed and the volume of the solution running through the sorbent and the type and volume of the eluent on the resulting sorption efficiency was evaluated. The sorption was successfully carried out from 50-1000 ml of solution which allows the 100 fold increase of the preconcentration factor and the determination of the microelements in g.l-1 instead of mg.l-1 by using the common ICP-AES. The influence of macroelements occurring in waters as well as B, Be, Bi, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sr, Ti, V and Zn in comparable concentrations involve less than 5% error. After the quantitative elution of microelements, the organic solvents were evaporated under IR lamps prior to the determination by ICP-AES and |ICP-MS. The conditions for the direct determination of arsenic, antimony, selenium and tellurium in g.l-1 with ICP-MS were also described in detail in the absence and presence of internal standards Ge and Bi. However, even in this case the preconcentration on silica in the presence of surfactant and selected organic complexants was also tested. When the sorption was followed from 500 ml a 50 fold enrichment factor is reached and the sensitivity for the microelements is improved. The direct determination and the sorption of microelements were applied on synthetic and real waters (dirinking, surface, mineral and sea waters). Instrumental and practical detection limits for various water samples were evaluated according to IUPAC. The results from 1000 ml solution of real waters after sorption on modified silica and the final determination of microelements with ICP-AES were compared with those from ICP-MS without sorption using the method of standards addition in the presence of suitable internal standards. By comparison of results for synthetic and real water samples the error of the determination of microelements was evaluated.