• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A study of the Xenopus and mouse U7 snRNAs

Watkins, Nicholas James January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
2

The Role of Splicing Factors and Small Nuclear RNAS in Spliceosomal Formation

Somarelli, Jason Andrew 16 June 2009 (has links)
Protein coding genes are comprised of protein-coding exons and non-protein-coding introns. The process of splicing involves removal of the introns and joining of the exons to form a mature messenger RNA, which subsequently undergoes translation into polypeptide. The spliceosome is a large, RNA/protein assembly of five small nuclear RNAs as well as over 300 proteins, which catalyzes intron removal and exon ligation. The selection of specific exons for inclusion in the mature messenger RNA is spatio-temporally regulated and results in production of an enormous diversity of polypeptides from a single gene locus. This phenomenon, known as alternative splicing, is regulated, in part, by protein splicing factors, which target the spliceosome to exon/intron boundaries. The first part of my dissertation (Chapters II and III) focuses on the discovery and characterization of the 45 kilodalton FK506 binding protein (FKBP45), which I discovered in the silk moth, Bombyx mori, as a U1 small nuclear RNA binding protein. This protein family binds the immunosuppressants FK506 and rapamycin and contains peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity, which converts polypeptides from cis to trans about a proline residue. This is the first time that an FKBP has been identified in the spliceosome. The second section of my dissertation (Chapters IV, V, VI and VII) is an investigation of the potential role of small nuclear RNA sequence variants in the control of splicing. I identified 46 copies of small nuclear RNAs in the 6X whole genome shotgun of the Bombyx mori p50T strain. These variants may play a role in differential binding of specific proteins that mediate alternative splicing. Along these lines, further investigation of U2 snRNA sequence variants in Bombyx mori demonstrated that some U2 snRNAs preferentially assemble into high molecular weight spliceosomal complexes over others. Expression of snRNA variants may represent another mechanism by which the cell is able to fine tune the splicing process.
3

On co-transcriptional splicing and U6 snRNA biogenesis

Listerman, Imke 11 September 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and has to undergo multiple processing events before it can be translated into a protein: a cap structure is added to its 5’ end, noncoding, intervening sequences (introns) are removed and coding exons are ligated together and a poly(A) tail is added to its 3’end. Splicing, the process of intron removal, is carried out in the spliceosome, a megacomplex comprehending up to 300 proteins. The core components of the spliceosome that directly interact with the pre-mRNA are the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). They consist of one of the U-rich snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5 or U6 together with several particle-specific proteins and core proteins. All mRNA processing events can occur co-transcriptionally, i.e. while the RNA is still attached to the gene via Pol II. The in vivo studies of co-transcriptional RNA processing events had been possible only in special biological systems by immunoelectron microscopy and only recently, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) made it possible to investigate cotranscriptional splicing factor assembly on genes. My thesis work is divided into two parts: Part I shows that the core components of the splicing machinery are recruited co-transcriptionally to mammalian genes in vivo by ChIP. The co-transcriptional splicing factor recruitment is dependent on active transcription and the presence of introns in genes. Furthermore, a new assay was developed that allows for the first time the direct monitoring of co-transcriptional splicing in human cells. The topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin increases splicing factor accumulation on the c-fos gene as well as co-transcriptional splicing levels, which provides direct evidence that co-transcriptional splicing events depend on the kinetics of RNA synthesis. Part II of the thesis is aimed to investigate whether Pol II has a functional role in the biogenesis of the U6 snRNA, which is the RNA part of the U6 snRNP involved in splicing. Pol III had been shown to transcribe the U6 snRNA gene, but ChIP experiments revealed that Pol II is associated with all the active U6 snRNA gene promoters. Pol II inhibition studies uncovered that U6 snRNA expression and probably 3’end formation is dependent on Pol II.
4

Small RNA Regulation of the Innate Immune Response: A Role for Dicer in the Control of Viral Production and Sensing of Nucleic Acids: A Dissertation

Nistler, Ryan J. 09 December 2015 (has links)
All organisms exist in some sort of symbiosis with their environment. The food we eat, air we breathe, and things we touch all have their own microbiota and we interact with these microbiota on a daily basis. As such, we employ a method of compartmentalization in order to keep foreign entities outside of the protected internal environments of the body. However, as other organisms seek to replicate themselves, they may invade our sterile compartments in order to do so. To protect ourselves from unfettered replication of pathogens or from cellular damage, we have developed a series of receptors and signaling pathways that detect foreign bodies as well as abnormal signals from our own perturbed cells. The downstream effector molecules that these signaling pathways initiate can be toxic and damaging to both pathogen and host, so special care is given to the regulation of these systems. One method of regulation is the production of endogenous small ribonucleic acids that can regulate the expression of various receptors and adaptors in the immune signaling pathways. In this dissertation, I present work that establishes an important protein in small ribonucleic acid regulation, Dicer, as an essential protein for regulating the innate immune response to immuno-stimulatory nucleic acids as well as regulating the productive infection of encephalomyocarditis virus. Depleting Dicer from murine embryonic fibroblasts renders a disparate type I interferon response where nucleic acid stimulation in the Dicer null cells fails to produce an appreciable interferon response while infection with the paramyxovirus, Sendai, induces a more robust interferon response than the wild-type control. Additionally, I show that Dicer plays a vital role in controlling infection by the picornavirus, encephalomyocarditis virus. Encephalomyocarditis virus fails to grow efficiently in Dicer null cells due to the inability for the virus to bind to the outside of the cell, suggesting that Dicer has a role in modulating viral infection by affecting host cellular protein levels. Together, this work identifies Dicer as a key protein in viral innate immunology by regulating both the growth of virus and also the immune response generated by exposure to pathogen associated molecular patterns. Understanding this regulation will be vital for future development of small molecule therapeutics that can either modulate the innate immune response or directly affect viral growth.
5

On co-transcriptional splicing and U6 snRNA biogenesis

Listerman, Imke 25 July 2006 (has links)
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and has to undergo multiple processing events before it can be translated into a protein: a cap structure is added to its 5’ end, noncoding, intervening sequences (introns) are removed and coding exons are ligated together and a poly(A) tail is added to its 3’end. Splicing, the process of intron removal, is carried out in the spliceosome, a megacomplex comprehending up to 300 proteins. The core components of the spliceosome that directly interact with the pre-mRNA are the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). They consist of one of the U-rich snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5 or U6 together with several particle-specific proteins and core proteins. All mRNA processing events can occur co-transcriptionally, i.e. while the RNA is still attached to the gene via Pol II. The in vivo studies of co-transcriptional RNA processing events had been possible only in special biological systems by immunoelectron microscopy and only recently, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) made it possible to investigate cotranscriptional splicing factor assembly on genes. My thesis work is divided into two parts: Part I shows that the core components of the splicing machinery are recruited co-transcriptionally to mammalian genes in vivo by ChIP. The co-transcriptional splicing factor recruitment is dependent on active transcription and the presence of introns in genes. Furthermore, a new assay was developed that allows for the first time the direct monitoring of co-transcriptional splicing in human cells. The topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin increases splicing factor accumulation on the c-fos gene as well as co-transcriptional splicing levels, which provides direct evidence that co-transcriptional splicing events depend on the kinetics of RNA synthesis. Part II of the thesis is aimed to investigate whether Pol II has a functional role in the biogenesis of the U6 snRNA, which is the RNA part of the U6 snRNP involved in splicing. Pol III had been shown to transcribe the U6 snRNA gene, but ChIP experiments revealed that Pol II is associated with all the active U6 snRNA gene promoters. Pol II inhibition studies uncovered that U6 snRNA expression and probably 3’end formation is dependent on Pol II.

Page generated in 0.1407 seconds