Municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permittees face costly obligations to reduce pollutant loadings needed to achieve waste load allocations (WLAs) and meet total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). Street sweeping is potentially an effective BMP since streets exist throughout urban watersheds, often are directly connected to the storm sewer, and are found to contain an abundance of contaminants. Although pollutant removal from street sweeping has been evaluated for decades, an understanding of the impact on water quality in receiving streams is elusive. Due to numerous variables, the large number of samples necessary to measure impact in receiving streams may never be obtained. In response, modeled pollutant removal efficiencies based on frequency of sweeping have been recommended to the Chesapeake Bay Program, but these results are suspect. Alternatively, the amount of swept material has emerged as a method to quantify reductions. A sampling study was conducted to measure pollutants in swept material. The study identified the fraction of material susceptible to transport in runoff based on timing of sweeping in relation to runoff events. Based on observed pollutant concentration associations with particle size, the study results in estimates of pollutant concentrations for the fraction of material susceptible to downstream transport, dependent on duration since the last rainfall and type of surface swept, whether the area is a streets or a parking lot. Pollutant loadings and required reductions to achieve the Chesapeake Bay WLAs for various land use sample areas are computed for an average year. Modeled removal efficiencies and results from the sampling study were employed to assess impacts from street sweeping. Modeled efficiencies predict significantly lower impact than measurements of pollutants susceptible to runoff in swept material. Modeled loadings are inconsistent with measurements of swept materials and the rigorous sweeping frequency required for modeled removal efficiency credit appears to be unnecessary. / Doctor of Philosophy / Many localities, state agencies and other public entities that own storm sewer systems are increasingly required to reduce pollutants discharged from their systems to surface waters as a result of programs stemming from the Clean Water Act. Traditional stormwater management practices, such as retention ponds, appear limited towards providing the total pollutant reductions necessary due to physical constraints, opportunity and cost. Street sweeping is potentially an effective alternative practice since streets exist throughout urban watersheds, often are directly connected to the storm sewer, are found to contain an abundance of contaminants and can be cost effective. Although pollutant removal from street sweeping has been evaluated for decades, an understanding of the pollutants removed from stormwater is elusive. Past studies suggest the large number of samples necessary to measure impact from sweeping in receiving streams may never be obtained. In response, pollutant removal estimates have been made using computer models, but modeled results are suspect since they cannot be calibrated. Alternatively, a measure of swept material has emerged as a method to quantify pollutant reductions. A sampling study was conducted to measure pollutants in swept material. Results identify the fraction of swept material washed from the swept surface dependent on timing of sweeping in relation to the duration since the last rainfall. Based on observed pollutant concentration associations with particle size, the study results in estimates of concentrations for the fraction of material susceptible to downstream transport, dependent on duration since the last rainfall and type of surface swept, whether the area is a streets or a parking lot. Application of the results are compared to modeled removal efficiencies towards achieving regulatory compliance within various land use sample areas. Modeled efficiencies predict significantly lower impact than measurements of pollutants susceptible to runoff in swept material. Rigorous sweeping frequency required for modeled removal efficiency credit appears to be unnecessary.